Difference between revisions of "STAC Buller"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 +
''' Buller, John '''
 +
*STAC 5/B1/38 - B A - 17 Eliz - Somerset - John Bullor v Peter Bale, Robert Burgge, Henry Clausey, John Hawker, Wiliiam Hughes et al
 +
*STAC 5/B81/1 - I D - 18 Eliz - Somerset - John Buller v Alexander Clausey
 +
*STAC 5/B16/7 - I D - 18 Eliz - Somerset - John Buller v Robert Burge
 +
**see [[STAC co Somerset]]
 +
 
''' Buller, John '''
 
''' Buller, John '''
*STAC 5/B1/38 - B A - 17 Eliz - John Bullor v Peter Bale, Robert Burgge, Henry Clausey, John Hawker, Wiliiam Hughes et al
 
*STAC 5/B81/1 - I D - 18 Eliz - John Buller v Alexander Clausey
 
*STAC 5/B16/7 - I D - 18 Eliz - John Buller v Robert Burge
 
 
*STAC 5/B3/38 - B A Rn Rr - Mich 22/23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, Wiliiam Austen
 
*STAC 5/B3/38 - B A Rn Rr - Mich 22/23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, Wiliiam Austen
 
*STAC 5/B88/6 - I D - 24 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Denys, William Austen
 
*STAC 5/B88/6 - I D - 24 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Denys, William Austen
Line 8: Line 15:
 
*STAC 5/B22/1 - C I D - 23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austin
 
*STAC 5/B22/1 - C I D - 23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austin
 
*STAC 5/B67/32 - I D - 23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austin
 
*STAC 5/B67/32 - I D - 23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austin
 +
 +
''' Buller, John '''
 
*STAC 7/18/72 - - - John Buller v James Hublowe
 
*STAC 7/18/72 - - - John Buller v James Hublowe
  
Line 16: Line 25:
 
*STAC 5/B36/8 - A - 17 Eliz - Philip Buller v Geronys Rollestone
 
*STAC 5/B36/8 - A - 17 Eliz - Philip Buller v Geronys Rollestone
  
'''Bevan Case Index '''
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
*Buller v Bale - STAC 5/B1/38, STAC 5/B16/7, STAC 5/B81/1
+
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 51v. Subpoena to hear judgement not being served personally the plaintiff was directed to publish the serving of it on the house or in the parish church. Buller, plaintiff; Curry, defendant: perjury and the subpoena to hear judgment fixed upon the defendant’s door who made default at the hearing, whereupon the court respited the hearing of the cause until the next term and directed the plaintiff to take out another subpoena and to serve the same personally or else to fix the same on the defendant’s door and afterward to publish the same in the parish church where the defendant dwelleth two several Sundays. Hillary 33 Elizabeth (kk)
*Buller v Dennis - STAC 5/B3/38, STAC 5/B22/1, STAC 5/B67/32, STAC 5/B76/40, STAC 5/B88/6
+
*Buller v Hublowe - STAC 7/18/72
+
*Buller v Rolleston - STAC 5/B36/8
+
*Buller v Wymond - STAC 5/B33/39
+
 
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
+

Latest revision as of 16:25, 21 June 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Buller, John

  • STAC 5/B1/38 - B A - 17 Eliz - Somerset - John Bullor v Peter Bale, Robert Burgge, Henry Clausey, John Hawker, Wiliiam Hughes et al
  • STAC 5/B81/1 - I D - 18 Eliz - Somerset - John Buller v Alexander Clausey
  • STAC 5/B16/7 - I D - 18 Eliz - Somerset - John Buller v Robert Burge

Buller, John

  • STAC 5/B3/38 - B A Rn Rr - Mich 22/23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, Wiliiam Austen
  • STAC 5/B88/6 - I D - 24 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Denys, William Austen
  • STAC 5/B76/40 - I D - 24 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austine
  • STAC 5/B22/1 - C I D - 23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austin
  • STAC 5/B67/32 - I D - 23 Eliz - John Buller v Gilbert Dennys, William Austin

Buller, John

  • STAC 7/18/72 - - - John Buller v James Hublowe

Buller, Matthew

  • STAC 5/B33/39 - B - 43 Eliz - Matthew Buller v Thomas Wimond, John Bullock, Pafrow Langdon

Buller, Philip

  • STAC 5/B36/8 - A - 17 Eliz - Philip Buller v Geronys Rollestone

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 51v. Subpoena to hear judgement not being served personally the plaintiff was directed to publish the serving of it on the house or in the parish church. Buller, plaintiff; Curry, defendant: perjury and the subpoena to hear judgment fixed upon the defendant’s door who made default at the hearing, whereupon the court respited the hearing of the cause until the next term and directed the plaintiff to take out another subpoena and to serve the same personally or else to fix the same on the defendant’s door and afterward to publish the same in the parish church where the defendant dwelleth two several Sundays. Hillary 33 Elizabeth (kk)