STAC Brode

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Brode, John

• STAC 5/B52/7 - B - - John Broode v Thomas Scoller
• STAC 5/B1/19 - B A C - 21 Eliz - John Brood v Thomas Skoller alias Penroythecke, Jasper Wetter
• STAC 5/B105/28 - B A Dr - 25 Eliz - John Broode v Anthony Warde et al
• STAC 5/B64/33 - I D - 25 Eliz - John Brode v Anthony Warde
• STAC 5/B64/8 - B A Rn Rr - 21 Eliz - John Brode v John Warde
• STAC 5/B25/7 - I D - 20 Eliz - John Broode v John Warde
• STAC 5/B89/13 - B A C I D - 32 Eliz - John Brode v Henry Baker, Nicholas Baker, John Downynge et al
• STAC 5/B53/37 - I D - 32 Eliz - John Brode v Henry Baker
• STAC 5/B95/31 - I D - 32 Eliz - John Brode v Henry Baker, John Collins
• STAC 5/B68/33 - B A D - 44 Eliz - John Broade v William Sanderson, Francis Bertie, Christopher Toldervey
• STAC 5/B28/35 - I D - 44 Eliz - John Brode v William Sanderson
• STAC 5/B103/1 - I D - 44 Eliz - John Brode v Andrew Palmer
• STAC 5/B105/8 - D - 44 Eliz - John Broade v Henry Bristowe
• STAC 5/B74/39 - I - 44 Eliz - John Brode v Henry Bristow
• STAC 5/B113/1 - Rn - - John Brode v Jasper Wherter

Brode, Matthew

• STAC 7/1/36 - - - Cornwall - Matthew Brode v John Hendy, Hugh Powell, John Pascowe, William Rickard, Arnold Wyllyams

Brode, Walter

• STAC 5/B60/5 - B A C I D Rn - 27 Eliz - Cornwall - Walter Brod, John Mulles, Thomas Mulles v John Hendie, John Powelle, William Richard et al
• STAC 5/B10/20 - I D - 22 Eliz - Cornwall - Walter Brode, John Mulles, Thomas Mulles v John Hendy et al
• STAC 5/B84/15 - I D - 28 Eliz - Cornwall - Walter Brode v John Hendie et al
• STAC 5/B82/20 - I D - 37 Eliz - Cornwall - Walter Brode, John Mullest, Thomas Mullest v John Simmonds
• STAC 5/B85/15 - C I D - 29 Eliz - Cornwall - Walter Broade v John Hindye et al
• STAC 5/B40/28 - I D - 27 Eliz - Cornwall - Walter Brode et al v William Grosse
• STAC 5/B107/27 - C I D - 29 Eliz - Cornwall - Walter Brode, John Mullens Sr, John Mullins Jr v John Hendie, Hugh Powell et al

Bevan Case Index

• Broad v Baker - STAC 5/B89/13, STAC 5/B53/37, STAC 5/B95/31
• Broad v Hendy - STAC 7/1/36, STAC 5/B60/5, STAC 5/B10/20, STAC 5/B40/28, STAC 5/B82/20, STAC 5/B84/15, STAC 5/B85/15, STAC 5/B107/27
• Broad v Newman - STAC 5/B8/36 see STAC Broad
• Broad v Saunderson - STAC 5/B68/33, STAC 5/B28/35, STAC 5/B74/39, STAC 5/B103/1, STAC 5/B105/8
• Broad v Scoller - STAC 5/B1/19, STAC 5/B52/7, STAC 5/B113/1
• Broad v Ward - STAC 5/B64/8, STAC 5/B105/28, STAC 5/B25/7, STAC 5/B64/33

Notes, Additions and Corrections

• STAC 7/1/36 - TNA Note: Launceston: Perjury
• Some cited figures that were comparatively modest. Discussing an exchange in which a gentleman had asked him to testify, a Cornish blacksmith remembered having announced that he ‘would not saye [as requested] for all the good he was worthe’. - TNA, STAC 5/B84/15, Edward Richard (deposition).

In the 1590s, a Cornish labourer recalled encountering a husbandman called John Symon. During their exchange, Symon was chained to the door of the town hall awaiting examination about various crimes (including perjury) that he may or may not have committed at a gentleman’s behest. The labourer asked: ‘“What, are you here yett? Have not you lost your eares yett?”’ Symon ‘laghed’ in response to the question. Given that his ears were subsequently cut off prior to his being hanged, his laugh might well be described as gallows humour. Hillary Taylor, The price of the poor’s words: social relations and the economics of deposing for one’s ‘betters’ in early modern England., Economic History Review (2018) https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12773 - STAC 5/B84/15, John Hicke (deposition). For more depositions related to this case, see TNA, STAC 5/B107/24; STAC 5/H15/26.