Difference between revisions of "STAC Boles"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''' de Boles, John ''' | ''' de Boles, John ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/B40/22 - | + | *STAC 5/B40/22 - moved to see [[STAC Boyes]] |
''' Boule, John ''' | ''' Boule, John ''' | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*STAC 5/B60/18 - I D - 33 Eliz - Frances Boolles v Thomas Hilles, Richard Webb | *STAC 5/B60/18 - I D - 33 Eliz - Frances Boolles v Thomas Hilles, Richard Webb | ||
*STAC 5/B81/14 - I D - 34 Eliz - Francis Booll v Thomas Hull | *STAC 5/B81/14 - I D - 34 Eliz - Francis Booll v Thomas Hull | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B21/25 - I - 31 Eliz - Francis Bowles v Thomas Hill et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B90/18 - I - 34 Eliz - Francis Bowles v Thomas Hill et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B51/12 - D - 34 Eliz - William Bowles v Thomas Hill et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B57/26 - I D - 31 Eliz - Francis Bolde v Thomas Hill, Richard Webb | ||
''' Bolles, George ''' | ''' Bolles, George ''' | ||
Line 20: | Line 24: | ||
*STAC 5/B58/40 - I D - 39 Eliz - Thomas Bolles v Edward Smith | *STAC 5/B58/40 - I D - 39 Eliz - Thomas Bolles v Edward Smith | ||
*STAC 5/B39/8 - A Dr - 44 Eliz - Thomas Boles v Nicholas Battyne | *STAC 5/B39/8 - A Dr - 44 Eliz - Thomas Boles v Nicholas Battyne | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Bevan Case Index ''' | ||
+ | *Bowles v Albert - STAC 5/B49/6 | ||
+ | *Bowles v Battyne - STAC 5/B39/8 | ||
+ | *Bowles v Hill - STAC 5/B25/2, STAC 5/B21/25, STAC 5/B57/26,STAC 5/B60/18, STAC 5/B65/24, STAC 5/B83/14, STAC 5/B90/18, STAC 5/B51/12 | ||
+ | *Bowles v Smith - STAC 5/B42/29, STAC 5/B58/40 | ||
+ | *Bowles v Taylor - STAC 5/B59/2, STAC 5/B28/23, STAC 5/B78/36 see [[STAC Bowle]] | ||
+ | *Bowles v Wade - STAC 5/B33/27, STAC 5/B46/12, STAC 5/B13/20 | ||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' |
Revision as of 17:30, 30 July 2015
de Boles, John
- STAC 5/B40/22 - moved to see STAC Boyes
Boule, John
- STAC 5/B49/6 - I D - 15 Eliz - John Boule v John Albert
Booles, Francis
- STAC 5/B25/2 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - Francis Booles v Thomas Hilles, Robert Atkinson et al
- STAC 5/B65/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - Francis Bolles v Thomas Hills, Robert March et al
- STAC 5/B60/18 - I D - 33 Eliz - Frances Boolles v Thomas Hilles, Richard Webb
- STAC 5/B81/14 - I D - 34 Eliz - Francis Booll v Thomas Hull
- STAC 5/B21/25 - I - 31 Eliz - Francis Bowles v Thomas Hill et al
- STAC 5/B90/18 - I - 34 Eliz - Francis Bowles v Thomas Hill et al
- STAC 5/B51/12 - D - 34 Eliz - William Bowles v Thomas Hill et al
- STAC 5/B57/26 - I D - 31 Eliz - Francis Bolde v Thomas Hill, Richard Webb
Bolles, George
- STAC 5/B42/29 - B A - 39 Eliz - George Bolles v Thomas Smyth, Edward Smyth, William Sharpleis et al
- STAC 5/B46/12 - B - 42 Eliz - George Bolles, Lawrence Hewet, Edward Barkham, Charles Hoskins, Danyell Enderbye, William Bonner, George Nedeler, Thomas Clifton, Edward Draper v Lawrence Wade, John Hutchenson, Robert Burton, Alice Sandworth
- STAC 5/B13/20 - I D - 42 Eliz - George Bolles et al v John Hutcheson, Richard Burton et al
- STAC 5/B33/27 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - George Bolles, Lawrence Hewett, Edward Barkham et al v Lawrence Wade et al
Boles, Thomas
- STAC 5/B58/40 - I D - 39 Eliz - Thomas Bolles v Edward Smith
- STAC 5/B39/8 - A Dr - 44 Eliz - Thomas Boles v Nicholas Battyne
Bevan Case Index
- Bowles v Albert - STAC 5/B49/6
- Bowles v Battyne - STAC 5/B39/8
- Bowles v Hill - STAC 5/B25/2, STAC 5/B21/25, STAC 5/B57/26,STAC 5/B60/18, STAC 5/B65/24, STAC 5/B83/14, STAC 5/B90/18, STAC 5/B51/12
- Bowles v Smith - STAC 5/B42/29, STAC 5/B58/40
- Bowles v Taylor - STAC 5/B59/2, STAC 5/B28/23, STAC 5/B78/36 see STAC Bowle
- Bowles v Wade - STAC 5/B33/27, STAC 5/B46/12, STAC 5/B13/20
Notes, Additions and Corrections