Difference between revisions of "STAC Beckingham"
From Waalt
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
''' Beckingham, Stephen ''' | ''' Beckingham, Stephen ''' | ||
*STAC 5/B19/35 - B A C I D - 37 Eliz - Stephen Beckingham v Thomas Tanner, Henry Pearson et al | *STAC 5/B19/35 - B A C I D - 37 Eliz - Stephen Beckingham v Thomas Tanner, Henry Pearson et al | ||
Line 6: | Line 10: | ||
''' Attorney General ''' | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
*STAC 5/A48/20 - I D - 45 Eliz - AG v Thomas Beckingham, Thomas Cooper, William Goddard et al | *STAC 5/A48/20 - I D - 45 Eliz - AG v Thomas Beckingham, Thomas Cooper, William Goddard et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
*STAC 7/10/13 - - - Oxfordshire - AG (Edward Coke) v William Beckingham alias Hicks et al | *STAC 7/10/13 - - - Oxfordshire - AG (Edward Coke) v William Beckingham alias Hicks et al | ||
+ | **[[STAC co Oxford]] | ||
− | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' |
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 16:57, 3 May 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Beckingham, Stephen
- STAC 5/B19/35 - B A C I D - 37 Eliz - Stephen Beckingham v Thomas Tanner, Henry Pearson et al
- STAC 5/B86/5 - I D - 42 Eliz - Stephen Beckingham v Henry Pearson, Francis Feary
- STAC 5/B82/1 - I D - 42 Eliz - Stephen Buckingham v Thomas Tanner
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A48/20 - I D - 45 Eliz - AG v Thomas Beckingham, Thomas Cooper, William Goddard et al
Attorney General
- STAC 7/10/13 - - - Oxfordshire - AG (Edward Coke) v William Beckingham alias Hicks et al
Notes, Additions and Corrections