Difference between revisions of "STAC Baldwin"
From Waalt
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
''' Baldwin, Charles ''' | ''' Baldwin, Charles ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/B88/34 - B A - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwin v Richard Warde, Robert Smyth et al | + | *STAC 5/B88/34 - B A - 35 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwin v Richard Warde, Robert Smyth et al |
− | *STAC 5/B104/9 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smyth et al | + | *STAC 5/B104/9 - I D - 35 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smyth et al |
− | *STAC 5/B105/33 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smyth | + | *STAC 5/B105/33 - I D - 35 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smyth |
− | *STAC 5/B108/34 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwin v Robert Smith, Henry Furnes et al | + | *STAC 5/B108/34 - I D - 35 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwin v Robert Smith, Henry Furnes et al |
− | *STAC 5/B99/3 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith | + | *STAC 5/B99/3 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith |
− | *STAC 5/B95/15 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith, Francis Smith, William Tiptowe et al | + | *STAC 5/B95/15 - I D - 35 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith, Francis Smith, William Tiptowe et al |
− | *STAC 5/B75/37 - I D - 35 Eliz - | + | *STAC 5/B75/37 - I D - 35 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smythe et al |
− | + | *STAC 5/B41/21 - I D - 35 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith, William Tiptowe, William Ward et al | |
− | *STAC 5/B41/21 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith, William Tiptowe, William Ward et al | + | **see [[STAC co Middlesex]] |
''' Baldwin, Christopher ''' | ''' Baldwin, Christopher ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/B3/30 - B A - 37 Eliz - Christopher Baldwyn v Richard Tempest, Hugh Laycocke, Peter Hargreaves, Leonard Smith, Robert Smith | + | *STAC 5/B3/30 - B A - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - Christopher Baldwyn v Richard Tempest, Hugh Laycocke, Peter Hargreaves, Leonard Smith, Robert Smith |
+ | **see [[STAC co York WR]] | ||
''' Baldwin, Edmund ''' | ''' Baldwin, Edmund ''' | ||
Line 18: | Line 23: | ||
''' Baldwin, William ''' | ''' Baldwin, William ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/B25/19 - B A - 34 Eliz - William Baldwin v Levye Basmore | + | *STAC 5/B25/19 - B A - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwin v Levye Basmore |
− | *STAC 5/B20/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - William Baldwyn v Levi Bassmore | + | *STAC 5/B20/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwyn v Levi Bassmore |
− | *STAC 5/B26/8 - Rn - 34 Eliz - William Baldwyn v Levy Basmore | + | *STAC 5/B26/8 - Rn - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwyn v Levy Basmore |
− | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' |
+ | *Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 37r. Perjury in affidavit in this court dismissed for that the affidavit and bill varied in substance. Bawden, plaintiff; Mountford: for perjury in an affidavit in this court which was dismissed for that the bill and affidavit agreed not in substance. Hillary 22 Elizabeth (kk) |
Latest revision as of 18:55, 24 November 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Baldwin, Charles
- STAC 5/B88/34 - B A - 35 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwin v Richard Warde, Robert Smyth et al
- STAC 5/B104/9 - I D - 35 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smyth et al
- STAC 5/B105/33 - I D - 35 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smyth
- STAC 5/B108/34 - I D - 35 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwin v Robert Smith, Henry Furnes et al
- STAC 5/B99/3 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith
- STAC 5/B95/15 - I D - 35 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith, Francis Smith, William Tiptowe et al
- STAC 5/B75/37 - I D - 35 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smythe et al
- STAC 5/B41/21 - I D - 35 Eliz - Middlesex - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith, William Tiptowe, William Ward et al
Baldwin, Christopher
- STAC 5/B3/30 - B A - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - Christopher Baldwyn v Richard Tempest, Hugh Laycocke, Peter Hargreaves, Leonard Smith, Robert Smith
- see STAC co York WR
Baldwin, Edmund
- STAC 5/B38/13 - I D - 41 Eliz - Edmund Baldwin v Thomas Griffith
- STAC 5/B38/23 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Edmund Baldwin v Thomas Griffith
Baldwin, William
- STAC 5/B25/19 - B A - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwin v Levye Basmore
- STAC 5/B20/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwyn v Levi Bassmore
- STAC 5/B26/8 - Rn - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwyn v Levy Basmore
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 37r. Perjury in affidavit in this court dismissed for that the affidavit and bill varied in substance. Bawden, plaintiff; Mountford: for perjury in an affidavit in this court which was dismissed for that the bill and affidavit agreed not in substance. Hillary 22 Elizabeth (kk)