Religion Miscellany 1581-1590

From Waalt
Revision as of 03:20, 9 April 2012 by Rpalmer (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This page will be segmented when it gets too long. Add information by clicking on "edit" above. Items should begin with term (if available) and year together with a letter to allow for distinguishing subsequent documents in the same year and term. The designation should be in bold. Thus an entry will appear as H1285 A:. Text thereafter should indicate what the document concerns. The link to the document should be a copied and pasted full web address (http:// . . .) surrounded by single brackets ( [ ] ). Leave a line between entries. The 25-year segments begin with a vertical bar and end with a vertical bar minus. Avoid other more complex codes. If you want to append a translation, provide a completely unique address surrounded by double brackets: Relig Misc H1275 A Tr. Such an address indicates sector and year, the A indicates it is the first document entered for that year and term, the Tr indicates it is a translation. That will constitute a unique address. DO NOT attempt to re-order documents within a term to achieve a perfect chronology, since it will invalidate other references to re-named documents. A document written in Notepad will copy into the site without any complicating code. Avoid more complicated coding. Check your entry before saving by clicking on "show preview below (return here by using the back arrow); before leaving the document, remember to save the page.

1590

  • H1590 A: Essex. Richard Browne MA v. Richard Lysett. Defamation for saying "Richarde Browne came over with Campyon and other Jesuytes and was a conferator with them and yf he had not recanted at Poules Crosse he had byn hanged with Campyon and I will make Barkinge (meaning the parish of Barking) to hott for him." [1] rcp
  • H1590 B: Worcestershire. John Rowse armiger v. Francis Hibbett alias Hubande. Defamation for saying "Olde Mayster Rowse lett fall a paper from him which was a letter from the pope and cardynalles to knowe of him howe many frendes they should fynde in this countrey yf they shoulde invade and that he wolde accuse him therof for that that master Follyott (one of the justices of the peace in Worcestershire) wolde have redd ytt and he toke yt out of his handes and wolde not suffer him to reade yt and further mayster Follyott did diverse tymes send to mayster Rowse for the copye of the same letter, who refused to deliver the same and therfor master Follyott would goe to the lieuetenant (John Russell knight) and declare yt unto him and yf mayster Follyott wolde not he wolde accuse mayster Rowse thereof." [2] rcp