Difference between revisions of "REQ 1/48"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 42: Line 42:
 
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0053.htm] || ||William Palen & Mary his wife ||Edward Mytton, Henry Bowrne & Richard Hasells || Defts (appearing by virtue of an attachment) to be examined touching their supposed contempts, and not to depart without the license of her Majesty's counsel
 
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0053.htm] || ||William Palen & Mary his wife ||Edward Mytton, Henry Bowrne & Richard Hasells || Defts (appearing by virtue of an attachment) to be examined touching their supposed contempts, and not to depart without the license of her Majesty's counsel
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0054.htm] || ||Richard Chibnall ||Edmond Toppe ||Defts suits at common law
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0054.htm] || ||Elizabeth Passell, widow & others ||Thomas Paternoster & others || Defts to attend & show cause why order should not be taken to establish the complts in possession of the lands & tenements in question
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0054.htm] || ||John Dorney ||Richard Barkley & others ||
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0054.htm] || ||John Snelhawke ||George Dyeke & others ||
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0054.htm] || ||John Holmes || Robert Paynter als Androwes ||Parties are both plt & deft
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0054.htm] || ||Alice Haynes, widow ||Francis Saunders ||
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0054.htm] || ||Henry, Lord Seymor ||Roger Hollande ||
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0055.htm] || ||William Samson ||Dudley Hawkes & others || Complt to bring in the rent due to the deft by the lease in question & 40s more, to remain in court until further order, and deft to show cause why the complt should not be established in possession of the house mentioned in the lease
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0055.htm] || ||Johan Earle ||John Earle & others || Claimed that Thomas Goodman & William Prior, two other of the defts, have colluded to procure the bond of £300 in question & that it does not in any way in law concern the complt. Complt claims to be administrator of Thomas Earle, but deft John Earle claims Thomas Earle made a will naming him as executor. Complt to attend and show cause why the matter should not be tried at common law.
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0055.htm] || ||Robert Whyte & others ||Nicholas Kendid & others ||
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0055.htm] ||28 May ||William Hannam & Margaret his wife ||Thomas Wallis ||Mem: 20s for costs paid by Richard Costley, brother in law to the deft, to Francis Conditt, son in law & solicitor for the complt, for the use of the complt, as per order
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0055.htm] || ||Robert Hardinge ||Alexander Halie ||
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0055.htm] || ||James Winstanley & Mary his wife ||William Dethicke als Garter, principal king at arms & others ||
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0055.htm] || ||William Day ||Richard Kitter || Dismissed
 
|-
 
|-
| [] || || || ||
+
| [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/REQ1no48/IMG_0055.htm] || ||Ewen Haddocke ||William Fynche ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| [] || || || ||
 
| [] || || || ||

Revision as of 15:37, 25 April 2019

REQ 1/48. List, Easter Term 39 Eliz I (1597)


in progress

Trinity Term 39 Eliz (1597)


List

Page Date of Entry Plaintiff(s)/Complainant(s) Defendant(s) Notes/Comments
[1] 27 May William Hannam & Margaret his wife Thomas Wallis Commission to be held at Shaftesbury, Dorset
[2] Francis Pratt Nicholas Winniffe
[3] George Smedley Robert Newdicke & others Since the complt exhibited his bill, he has also commenced suit at common law, therefore dismissed from this court.
[4] Prudence Cawston, widow Nicholas Gilborne & William Petley
[5] Michael Farrer als Turner John Allen & Elizabeth his wife Dismissed unless complt proceeds by thursday next
[6] Alice Langton, widow Thomas Fletcher Pauper
[7] George Hewson & Grace his wife George Sheppey & Edward Graveley Defts to attend & show cause why they should not bring into court the writings confessed in their answers
[8] Elizabeth Goulde & others Robert Longe & others Deft Robert Longe to attend & show cause why he should not bring into court the writings confessed in his answer
[9] William Redmar John Wilson & others Complt at liberty to amend his bill on the mistaken points, upon payment of 10s costs to the deft
[10] Thomas Snagge Humfrey Fitxwilliams Deft to attend monday next to speak in maintenance of his demurrer or else make his full answer without delay
[11] Robert Myles Giles Allen & others Refs bill in Chancery, but as persons named are not the same, case retained in this court & deft to make answer
[12] William Palen & Mary his wife Edward Mytton, Henry Bowrne & Richard Hasells Defts (appearing by virtue of an attachment) to be examined touching their supposed contempts, and not to depart without the license of her Majesty's counsel
[13] Richard Chibnall Edmond Toppe Defts suits at common law
[14] Elizabeth Passell, widow & others Thomas Paternoster & others Defts to attend & show cause why order should not be taken to establish the complts in possession of the lands & tenements in question
[15] John Dorney Richard Barkley & others
[16] John Snelhawke George Dyeke & others
[17] John Holmes Robert Paynter als Androwes Parties are both plt & deft
[18] Alice Haynes, widow Francis Saunders
[19] Henry, Lord Seymor Roger Hollande
[20] William Samson Dudley Hawkes & others Complt to bring in the rent due to the deft by the lease in question & 40s more, to remain in court until further order, and deft to show cause why the complt should not be established in possession of the house mentioned in the lease
[21] Johan Earle John Earle & others Claimed that Thomas Goodman & William Prior, two other of the defts, have colluded to procure the bond of £300 in question & that it does not in any way in law concern the complt. Complt claims to be administrator of Thomas Earle, but deft John Earle claims Thomas Earle made a will naming him as executor. Complt to attend and show cause why the matter should not be tried at common law.
[22] Robert Whyte & others Nicholas Kendid & others
[23] 28 May William Hannam & Margaret his wife Thomas Wallis Mem: 20s for costs paid by Richard Costley, brother in law to the deft, to Francis Conditt, son in law & solicitor for the complt, for the use of the complt, as per order
[24] Robert Hardinge Alexander Halie
[25] James Winstanley & Mary his wife William Dethicke als Garter, principal king at arms & others
[26] William Day Richard Kitter Dismissed
[27] Ewen Haddocke William Fynche
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]