Difference between revisions of "Prohibition/Premunire"

From Waalt
Line 84: Line 84:
 
'''H1348 B:''' Devon.  Inquest into contempt by John, Bishop of Exeter over distraint for damages recovered in action of quare incumbravit concerning the church of Kilkhampton.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E3/KB27no351/aKB27no351fronts/IMG_1751.htm]
 
'''H1348 B:''' Devon.  Inquest into contempt by John, Bishop of Exeter over distraint for damages recovered in action of quare incumbravit concerning the church of Kilkhampton.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E3/KB27no351/aKB27no351fronts/IMG_1751.htm]
  
'''E1348 A:''' Devon. Rex & Hugh de Askham cleric v. John Wrey chaplain together with Nicholas de Restercombe, Nicholas Beagh, Jordan vicar of Byry, and Richard Lerde for violation of proclamations prohibiting obtaining papal bulls and processes, some of which concerned the presentation to the position of the prior of Totton. [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E3/KB27no352/aKB27no352fronts/IMG_2455.htm], [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E3/KB27no354/bKB27no354mm1dtoEnd/IMG_7348.htm], [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E3/KB27no354/bKB27no354mm1dtoEnd/IMG_7628.htm], [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E3/KB27no355/bKB27no355mm1dtoEnd/IMG_8173.htm] rcp
+
'''E1348 A:''' Devon. Rex & Hugh de Askham cleric v. John Wrey chaplain together with Nicholas de Restercombe, Nicholas Beagh, Jordan vicar of Byry, and Richard Lerde for violation of proclamations prohibiting obtaining papal bulls and processes, some of which concerned the presentation to the position of the prior of Totton. [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E3/KB27no352/aKB27no352fronts/IMG_2455.htm], [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E3/KB27no354/bKB27no354mm1dtoEnd/IMG_7348.htm], [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E3/KB27no354/bKB27no354mm1dtoEnd/IMG_7628.htm], [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E3/KB27no355/bKB27no355mm1dtoEnd/IMG_8173.htm], [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E3/KB27no356/bKB27no356mm1dtoEnd/IMG_8740.htm]  rcp
  
 
'''E1348 B:''' Certiorari. Oyer and terminer (19 Edward III). Gloucestershire.  Rex & Phillip de Alcestre parson of Little Compton v. Robert Walteres de Iccombe cleric, Leonard de Lucy parson of Chiriton, Elias de Iccombe chaplain, Walter Dene de Shutteford, William Leonardesprest de Lucy, John Broun de Ilmyngdone, Thomas Smythes de Ilmyndone, William atte Watre de Ilmyndone, John atte Grene de Magna Compton cleric, Walter de Dorne de Shesencote, Walter de Trowell de Shesencote, Richard de Botetorte, Henry Henene, William atte Grene chaplain, John atte Clyve de Tydilmynton, John le Frend de Breilles, Simon le Whyte, Thomas Balle, and Thomas Bernard de Breylles and others (unnamed), who with armed force broke into the rectory at Little Compton, held it with armed force for ten days, took goods and chattels worth 100 marks, and ejected Phillip's servants, all this after the king's recovery in Rex v. Prior of Deerhurst; the king had then presented Alcestre to Wulfstan, bishop of Worcester and Alcestre had been instituted.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E3/KB27no352/aKB27no352fronts/IMG_2457.htm]
 
'''E1348 B:''' Certiorari. Oyer and terminer (19 Edward III). Gloucestershire.  Rex & Phillip de Alcestre parson of Little Compton v. Robert Walteres de Iccombe cleric, Leonard de Lucy parson of Chiriton, Elias de Iccombe chaplain, Walter Dene de Shutteford, William Leonardesprest de Lucy, John Broun de Ilmyngdone, Thomas Smythes de Ilmyndone, William atte Watre de Ilmyndone, John atte Grene de Magna Compton cleric, Walter de Dorne de Shesencote, Walter de Trowell de Shesencote, Richard de Botetorte, Henry Henene, William atte Grene chaplain, John atte Clyve de Tydilmynton, John le Frend de Breilles, Simon le Whyte, Thomas Balle, and Thomas Bernard de Breylles and others (unnamed), who with armed force broke into the rectory at Little Compton, held it with armed force for ten days, took goods and chattels worth 100 marks, and ejected Phillip's servants, all this after the king's recovery in Rex v. Prior of Deerhurst; the king had then presented Alcestre to Wulfstan, bishop of Worcester and Alcestre had been instituted.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E3/KB27no352/aKB27no352fronts/IMG_2457.htm]

Revision as of 20:23, 31 January 2012

This page will be segmented when it gets too long. Add information by clicking on "edit" above. Items should begin with term (if available) and year together with a letter to allow for distinguishing subsequent documents in the same year and term. The designation should be in bold. Thus an entry will appear as H1285 A:. Text thereafter should indicate what the document concerns. The link to the document should be a copied and pasted full web address (http:// . . .) surrounded by single brackets ( [ ] ). Leave a line between entries. The 25-year segments begin with a vertical bar and end with a vertical bar minus. Avoid other more complex codes. If you want to append a translation, provide a completely unique address surrounded by double brackets: ProPre H1275 A Tr. Such an address indicates sector and year, the A indicates it is the first document entered for that year and term, the Tr indicates it is a translation. That will constitute a unique address. DO NOT attempt to re-order documents within a term to achieve a perfect chronology, since it will invalidate other references to re-named documents. A document written in Notepad will copy into the site without any complicating code. Avoid more complicated coding. Check your entry before saving by clicking on "show preview below (return here by using the back arrow); before leaving the document, remember to save the page.

1225:

1250:

1275:

1300:

T1302 A: Prohibition. Northamptonshire. Rex v. John de Ferrers. For prosecuting Thomas, earl of Lancaster before the Archbishop of Canterbury et al. at St. Paul's. Presumed knowledge of the law. [1]. Related: [2]

H1303 A: King's council handling of a papal provision to Wolverhampton. [3]

M1303 A: Novel disseisin handling a corrody. Lawrence de Offyn v. Prior of Holy Trinity, York, Brother Gervase le Fraunceys, Brother Ingelram le Fraunceys, & Brother William le Flemyng. [4]

E1304 A: Prohibition with pardon. Nottinghamshire. Rex v. John de Auneslee. [5]

E1304 B: Prohibition. Cornwall. Rex v. William de Bodrygan archdeacon of Cornwall. concerning chapel of St. Berian. [6], [7]

T1304 A: Prohibition. Delivery of a prohibition concerning the presentation of the sacristan of the church of Blessed Mary and All Saints of York. [8], [9]

T1304 B: Prohibition. Undersheriff arrested priest during liturgy. Archbishop excommunicated undersheriff. Judgment in favor of the undersheriff or oder to arrest the archbishop. [10] See also WAALT under Canterbury.

T1304 C: Quare non admisit. Rex v. Archbishop of York. Prebend of Stillington in church of St Peter of York. [11]

M1304 A: Prohibition. Rex v. Archbishop of Canterbury. Presentation to St Oswald, Gloucester. Archbishop had excommunicated the prior and canons of the church. [12]; Related: [13]; [14]; [15]. Prior of St. Oswald v. Robert, archbishop of Canterbury. [16]. Reversal of sentence. [17]

M1304 B: Procedure without prohibition for threatening immunity of chapel of St Martin the Great in London. Rex v. Master John de Sancta Fide. [18]

M1304 C: Prohibition. Abbot of St Augustine, Canterbury v. Geoffrey, abbot of Faversham. taking of tithes in kind from Selling. [19]; [20]

H1305 A: Quare non admisit. Rex v. Master Walter de Thorp, dean of the consistory of the Arches, London & Master Gilbert de Middelton, concerning the advowson of Dodderhill, Worcestershire; the king had recovered that advowson against Robert, archbishop of Canterbury, the bishop of Worcester, the Prior of Worcester, and John de Middelton cleric. [21]

H1305 B: Illegal appeals to Rome. Rex v. Gilbert de Segrave, archdeacon of Oxford. Mainperned for parliament. [22]

M1309 A: Complicated presentment to St Leonard's Hospital in Chesterfield. [23]; [24]

H1315 A: Prohibition against creation of a vicarage that would reduce the value of a prior royal appointment to Llanbadarn-Vawr. Rex v. Bishop of St. David. [25]; see [26]

H1315 B: Rex v. Walter bishop of Exeter. Prohibition against violation of the liberty of St Berian chapel, Cornwall. [27]

E1316 A: Protection of prior of Malton in his return from parliament. [28]

T1316 A: Violation of prohibition that protected the immunity of the king's chapel of Bosham, Sussex, seemingly particularly in regard to the choir. [29]

E1320 A: Rex v. John de St Albans parson of Moryngthorpe, Alexander de Berneye parson of Swanton Abbots, Master John de Slyndon, and John de la Lee. Citation outside the realm. Defendants by usurpation held inquisitions done to John de Slyndon and John de la Lee and then cited Hugh abbot of St Albans, brother Richard de Paxton archdeacon of that house, brother Richard de Hedersete, brother Alexander Dypere, and brother William de Benner co-monks of the abbot, as well as Master Hugh de Ware cleric, Thomas Grauncourt, William Sergaunt intheHalle, John Palefreyman, and John the Celereresman to answer outside the realm. [30]

1325:

H1347A: Yorkshire. Rex v. Thomas de Carleton. The king had recovered the presentation to Sigston, Yorkshire, and prohibited all and singular from doing anything to the contrary, but Thomas with Henry de Foxton, Hugh de Fletham, John de Masfeld chaplain, William Fereby, William Rose, Adam de Kirkeby, and Gilbert de Kyrkeby intruded into the church with armed force and procured legal processes against John de Halneraby, the king's nominee, who had been canonically installed. [31]; jury summons of 24 jurors for the same factual allegations in E1348 [32], [33]

H1347B: Rex v. Simon Benet de Keten chaplain. Whereas the king in common pleas recovered the presentment to St Peters Stamford against the prior of St. Fromond, Simon, scheming to enervate that judgment drew into a plea in foreign court Richard Martyn cleric whom the king had presented and who had been canonically installed. Exigent order. [34]. Simon was apparently aided by Stephen and John his brothers and by Walter in the Pyt, chaplain. [35], [36], [37]

H1347C:Inquest on those notaries public who undermined the king's court by drawing personnel into court Christian outside the realm. The inquest returned that Peter de Normandeby notary public did thus by serving process on Edmund de Grymesby king's clerk in chancery on October 25, 19 Edward III for a case of quare impedit between Hugh le Despenser and Elizabeth his wife against John de Kellesey concerning the churchof Barwe by Edmund's counsel. The citations were made in the presence of the king in Westminster Palace and in the presence of the justices of both benches hearing pleas during term. Exigent. [38]; [39]

H1347D:Jury between the king and Master John de O and Simon de Sudbury, commissaries of the bishop of Norwich [and companion case against the bishop of Norwich]: whether the commissaries, to collect the bishop's tax of 12d to the mark on spiritual goods, had threatened the Abbot of Bury St Edmunds to make him denounce the abbot and convent of Ramsey already excommunicated and had threatened the abbot of St Edmunds with greater excommunication if he did not pay the same tax both before and after the king's prohibition delivered to them. [40]

H1347E:Outlawry of Master Robert de Thresk. The king had recovered the presentation to the prebend of Thorpe in the church of Howden, Yorkshire, and the archbishop had installed Master Ralph de Blaykeston cleric. Master Robert de Thresk then drew Blaykeston into foreign court. [41]

H1347F:Alleged extortions in Canterbury ecclesiastical court by Thomas de Canterbury rector of Brookland and Master Peter Duraunt; necessity of prohibition. [42]

H1347G: Northamptonshire. Rex v. Simon Benet de Keten chaplain and John Benet his brother notary public his brother, (Robert atte Brigg de East Depping and John in Pyt de Langetoft): undermining king's court judgment concerning church of St Peter Stamford by suing in foreign court. [43], [44], [45] rcp

H1348 A: London. Rex v. Master Robert de Barton: attachment against prohibition: defendant procured against prohibition papal instruments contrary to the judgment in quare impedit of Rex v. Abbot of Blessed Mary of York concerning the church of Hornsey. Includes letter close that Barton submitted and was pardoned. [46]

H1348 B: Devon. Inquest into contempt by John, Bishop of Exeter over distraint for damages recovered in action of quare incumbravit concerning the church of Kilkhampton. [47]

E1348 A: Devon. Rex & Hugh de Askham cleric v. John Wrey chaplain together with Nicholas de Restercombe, Nicholas Beagh, Jordan vicar of Byry, and Richard Lerde for violation of proclamations prohibiting obtaining papal bulls and processes, some of which concerned the presentation to the position of the prior of Totton. [48], [49], [50], [51], [52] rcp

E1348 B: Certiorari. Oyer and terminer (19 Edward III). Gloucestershire. Rex & Phillip de Alcestre parson of Little Compton v. Robert Walteres de Iccombe cleric, Leonard de Lucy parson of Chiriton, Elias de Iccombe chaplain, Walter Dene de Shutteford, William Leonardesprest de Lucy, John Broun de Ilmyngdone, Thomas Smythes de Ilmyndone, William atte Watre de Ilmyndone, John atte Grene de Magna Compton cleric, Walter de Dorne de Shesencote, Walter de Trowell de Shesencote, Richard de Botetorte, Henry Henene, William atte Grene chaplain, John atte Clyve de Tydilmynton, John le Frend de Breilles, Simon le Whyte, Thomas Balle, and Thomas Bernard de Breylles and others (unnamed), who with armed force broke into the rectory at Little Compton, held it with armed force for ten days, took goods and chattels worth 100 marks, and ejected Phillip's servants, all this after the king's recovery in Rex v. Prior of Deerhurst; the king had then presented Alcestre to Wulfstan, bishop of Worcester and Alcestre had been instituted. [53]

E1348 C: Norfolk. Adjudication to the king of presentment to the deaconry of Cranewiz that became vacant while the temporalities of the bishop of Norwich were in the king's hands by judgment of the king's court. [54]

E1348 D: Norfolk. Quare non admisit. Rex v. William bishop of Norfolk for the archdeaconry of Norwich. [55]

E1348 E: Yorkshire. Quare non admisit. Rex v. William, archbishop of York for the church of Rothley, to which the king had presented Henry de Greystok. [56]; [57]

E1348 F: Devon. Prohibition. The temporalities of the priory of Colwick were in the king's hands by reason of the war with France. Edward III recovered the presentation to the vicary of St Thomas by Exeter against the Prior of Colwick. Simon Russell allegedly now entered and occupied that church by virtue of a papal presentation. Jury continuation. [58], [59] rcp

E1348 G:Hampshire. Rex v. Abbess of Wherwell. King had recovered against the abbess the presentment to the prebend of to the prebend of Middleton in the church of Holy Cross of Wherwell and then had presented Master Peter de Inkepenne and prohibited Roger le Mareschal of Bedford cleric from doing anything to prejudice that presentation. Peter, however, obtained citations, provocations, appeals, and processes and impediments in Wherwell and elsewhere. [60], [61], [62], [63], [64] rcp

E1348 H: Suffolk. Quare non admisit. Rex v. William bishop of Norwich. King had recovered presentment to the archdeaconry of Suffolk against the bishop; the bishop was thus ordered to accept the person the king presented. The king presented Michael de Northburgh, whom the bishop refused to admit. [65], [66]

E1348 I: Norfolk. Quare non admisit. Rex v. William bishop of Norwich. King had recovered presentment to the archdeaconry of Norwich against the bishop; the bishop was thus ordered to accept the person the king presented. The king presented Master John Berenger to the archdeaconry, whom the bishop refused to admit. A letter close then retails that the bishop had appealled to the archbishop of Canterbury. But the letter close goes on to relate that king now is assured that the bishop is not impeding, so that the king drops the prosecution. The letter close is dated May 16, 22 Edward III (1348) [67]

T1348 A: Norfolk. Recitation that all the temporalities and possessions of the bishop of Norwich had been taken into the king's hand and that a deanery (designation illegible) had become vacant, a scire facias issued to the bishop so that he could come to give any reason he had why the king should not present to the deanery. The bishop does not come, so the king recovers. [68]

T1348 B: Devon. Rex v. John bishop of Exeter, Tibertus prior of Barnstaple, John prior of Pilton, and William Inge parson Heanton. Jury to determine if the bishop by the other defendants his commissaries on 29 July 1347 excommunicated Walter de Steveneston undersheriff, Theobald de Greneville, Thomas de Merton, and Henry de Merton and certain other ministers of the king specially assigned to execute certain orders of the king, the major excommuications being specifically for the execution of those orders. The jury here is put into respite until Michaelmas. Notations thereafter for Hilary 22 Edward III m. 61 among the common pleas and m. 6. [69], [70], [71], [72]

T1348 C: Devon. Rex & Hugh de Askham cleric v. John Wrey chaplain. Wrey secured papal processes and delivered them inside the realm to undermine Hugh de Askham's possession of the vicary of Brixham. Immediately followed by enrollment of suit against additional defendants: Nicholas de Restercombe, Nicholas Beagh, Jordan vicar of Bury, and Richard Lorde. [73]

T1348 D: Certiorari. Common Pleas. (19 Edward III). Quare incumbravit. Theobald de Greneville v. John bishop of Exeter, concerning the church of Kilkhampton. [74]

T1348 E: Lincolnshire? Rex v. John de Wakefeld vicar of Middle Rasen. Contrary to the law and custom of the realm Wakefeld drew the Prior of Drax outside the realm to answer concerning lay fee in Middle Rasen and concerning various contracts pertaining to the king's congnizance and against the king's prohibition. [75]

M1348 A: Yorkshire. Presentment that Eustathia who was the wife of Peter de Middelton late sheriff of Yorkshire and William de Wetherby chaplain executors of Peter de Middelton prosecuted William de Popelton parson of Harewood in court Christian before Master Thomas Sampson official of the Archbishop of York notwithstanding the king's prohibition delivered to Thomas in York Consistory in May 1348 concerning suggestions about how it pertained to the sheriff to make panels of inquests and to take gifts and honors according to the things done, matters that are contrary to the oath expressly mandated by statute for sheriffs. To move this false suit Walter de Kereby procured the executors to prosecute in court Christian for 10 p.s. that Walter intimated to the executors was promised to Walter as undersheriff to the use of Peter his master, so that the Master Thomas official at the suit made Adam vicar of Berdesay his commissary for determining the plea. Adam condemned William de Popelton for 10 p.s. plus 100s for expences of the executors and for 20 p.s. to the use of the church of St Peter, York. He made to be excommunicated William in all the churches of the deanery of Aynsty. The executors prosecuted a royal writ of significavit to arrest William regardless of the royal prohibition or of William's appeal at the Roman court. The procurators for this business were Walter de Kereby, John de Midelton, Adam de Midelton parson of Merston, and Robert de Rampton. [76]

M1348 B: London. The king had recovered in common pleas last Easter term the presentment to the church of St Albans of Woodstreet, London against Brother John de Heton master of the Hospital of St James by Westminster. Sicut prius jury summons to determine if Geoffrey de Heggesore cleric then intruded into the church and occupied it and still detains it. [77] rcp [78], [79] rcp

M1348 C: Yorkshire. Found by jury that Richard de Durem skinner vexed William de Ingelton for a year and a half by suing a plea of debt not involving a will or marriage in court Christian before the commissary of the archdeacon of Richmond and made him to be cited before the commissary in 12 Edward III and still vexes him, causing William 4 marks in expences. [80]

M1348 D: Yorkshire. The king had recovered in common pleas against the prior of Durham the presentation to the church of Siggeston then vacant; he then presented John de Halnaby. John was canonically admitted and instituted. This suit alleges that Thomas de Carleton, Henry de Foxton, Hugh de Fletham, John de Manfeld, William de Feryby, William Rose, Adam de Kirkeby, and Gilbert de Kirkeby in 1346 with armed power and in warlike mode intruded into the church and expelled John and procured ecclesiastical processes prejudicial to the king and against the royal prohibition. [81], [82] rcp; [83], [84] rcp

M1348 E: Yorkshire. Rex v. John de Bolton parson of Lyth. The prior of St Oswald of Nostell lately in common pleas in 17 Edward III sought execution of arrears of an annual rent of 36 marks against John de Bolton. Bolton by suggestion made to the pope that the prior was drawing him into king's court against the law of holy church and made the prior to be summoned before the pope at Avignon and drew into a plea in the Roman court outside the realm. The prior presented a pardon dated November 6 1346. [85] rcp

H1349 A: Yorkshire. Presented that Richard de London of Beverley sequestrator of the archbishop of York in the East Riding together with other ministers of the archbishop vexed and continuingly vexes the burgesses of Scarborough against liberties granted by the king; they cite them in temporal causes not touching wills or marriage against the royal prohibition. They also cite the burgesses to appear ex officio in the chapter outside the borough by 15 miles. [86] rcp

H1349 B: Yorkshire. Presented that Master John de Stokeslay who holds at farm the jurisdiction of the deanery of Pockelington drew before him by color of his office laymen for debts and contracts that were not of wills or marriage to have a profit by extortion. [87] rcp

H1349 C: Yorkshire. Presented that Walter de Thornton vicar of Doncaster in September 1346, scheming to worsen many of his parishioners took the office of dean of Doncaster to be able to make people come before and impose causes on them that ought not be determined in church court; by extortion he took 5s from William del Yle and 6s8d from Joh Piper of Doncaster; he vexed John Saundre until he made fine for 5s, and so treated the people in his jurisdiction for ten years. [88] rcp

H1349 D: London. William Greylond citizen of London v. Thomas Blundel de Snydele cleric. William in common pleas had recovered his presentation to the church of St Stephen of Walbrook against the Abbot of Colchester. The king prohibited Thomas from doing anything prejudicial to that judgment. Thomas procured church court processes nonetheless. [89]. Blundel denied receipt of the prohibition and everything else. [90] rcp

H1349 E: Yorkshire. Presented that Roger de Blaykeston had recovered his presentation to the prebend of Thorpe in the church of St Peter of Howden against Willim Couton lately prior of Durham by reason of a grant he had from the same prior. Roger presented Ralph de Blaykeston cleric who was admitted and installed and held the prebend peacefully for seven years. The king issued a prohibition against anyone doing anything in court Christian to prejudice the king's court judgment. Robert Thresk, scheming to annul the judgment and the right of patronage outside the realm, asserted that the prebend was vacant and drew Ralph in court Christian such that Nicholas Dautry, William Cecil, Thomas Cecil chaplain, Hugh de Fletcham, William son of Walter de Otryngton, Richard de Solbyry, John de Buskby chaplain, and William de Wyresthorp chaplain (the procurators, notaries, and executors of the business of Thresk) fulminated a sentence of excommunication on Ralph for 100 florens for their expenses and 200 p.s. for damages in the churches of St Peter, York, and through the whole city in the church of Howden on September 29, 1348 through to the feast of Hilary, against the king's prohibition. [91] rcp

H1349 F: Yorkshire. Presented that: Robert de Sallay late a citizen of York built a messuage on a waste within the parish of St Michael, York by assent and licence of the abbot of St Mary, York patron of the church, Richard de Wyghton parson of the church, and by licence of the king and others. Afterwards he gave that messuage to one Walter de Layburn and his successors for a chantry to be made at the altar of the Virgin Mary in the church of St Michael. Then Master Robert de Thresk (see the case above), William Copersmyth and Matilda his wife, and Andrew de Helperby prosecuted in court Christian outside the realm (in the papal court at Avignon) against the prohibition of the king against Robert de Sallay and Robert son of the same Robert concerning the said lay fee. They so prosecuted that it was considered that the messuage be razed at the cost of Robert son and heir of Robert de Sallay and that Robert son of Robert satisfy William Copersmyth and Matilda his wife and Andrew de Helperby of 40 p.s. within twelve days after proclamation of the sentence. William son of Walter de Estryngton, Nicholas Dautrye, John de Middelton somonour, and John de Hagthorp pronounced through Yorkshire from the feast of the Purification 1347 to the next Michaelmas. The bailiffs of the city continued the execution of the sentence and prohibited Robert son of Robert not to prosecute or acquire a royal prohibition under penalty of excommunication; they ordered the messuage to be razed; they prohibited the chancellor, justices, sheriffs and other ministers not to do anything to perturb that complaint, in contempt of the king and aainst his probition, in perturbation of the chantry and debilitation of the city and against the law of the land. [92]

H1349 G: Shropshire. Quare non admisit. Rex v. John, bishop of Hereford. The king recovered against Lawrence de Lodelowe chivaler his presentment to half the church of Westbury in king's bench and the king ordered the bishop to admit Henry de Tatton cleric presented by the king, but the bishop refused to admit him. [93], [94]

E1349 A: Kent. Prior of Dover (qui tam) v. Master Lawrence Fastolf, Robert de Mallyng, Nicholas de Yestele, and Stephen de Bello, commissaries of Robert prior of Christchurch Canterbury late guardian of the spirituality of the archbishop of Canterbury sede vacante, together with Robert prior of Christchurch, Master John de Wymbourne and Thomas de Morton commissaries of Robert prior of Christchurch. Henry II had granted Theobald archbishop of Canterbury by a charter that that lord king confirmed in alms to Christchuch Canterbury and to Theobald then archbishop and all his successors the church of St Martin, Dover and that the monks there would inviolably observe the rule of St. Benedict by the authority of Pope Innocent and that the archbishop would control. That authority could not be delegated to others than the archbishop even sede vacante. The prior of Christchurch, however, began impositions and exactions after the death of the archbishop, and the king ordered them to stop. The prior did not stop but rather got the prior of Dover and some of the officers of the house excommunicated and got the goods of the church sequestered. [95], [96]



1350:

1375:

1400:

1425:

1450

1475:

1500:

1525:

1550:

1575:

1600:

1625:

1650:

1675: