Difference between revisions of "C78 1872"

From Waalt
Line 192: Line 192:
 
|-
 
|-
  
 
 
! 1872
 
| 13 March
 
|
 
| Charles Henry Robert of no. 15 Newington Causeway, Surrey, linen draper, a contributory of the Company named below
 
| In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 and 1867 in relation to the Imperial Land Company of Marseilles Limited
 
| C78/2236, no. 8 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0043.htm]
 
|-
 
  
  
Line 219: Line 210:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| C78/2235, no. 3 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0266.htm]
 
| C78/2235, no. 3 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0266.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 13 March
 +
|
 +
| Charles Henry Robert of no. 15 Newington Causeway, Surrey, linen draper, a contributory of the Company named below
 +
| In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 and 1867 in relation to the Imperial Land Company of Marseilles Limited
 +
| C78/2236, no. 8 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0043.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 260: Line 260:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| C78/2235, no. 7 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0282.htm]
 
| C78/2235, no. 7 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0282.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 20 March
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 1 []
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 281: Line 291:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| C78/2235, no. 9 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0292.htm]
 
| C78/2235, no. 9 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0292.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 19 April
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 17 []
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 311: Line 331:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| C78/2236, no. 19 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0094.htm]
 
| C78/2236, no. 19 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0094.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 29 April
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 2 []
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 392: Line 422:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| C78/2236, no. 21 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0106.htm]
 
| C78/2236, no. 21 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0106.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 11 June
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 3 []
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 435: Line 475:
 
| C78/2236, no. 23 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0118.htm]
 
| C78/2236, no. 23 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0118.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 20 June
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 4 []
 +
|-
 +
  
  
Line 445: Line 496:
 
| C78/2236, no. 12 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0066.htm]
 
| C78/2236, no. 12 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0066.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 24 June
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 5 []
 +
|-
 +
  
  
Line 455: Line 517:
 
| C78/2235, no. 21 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0350.htm]
 
| C78/2235, no. 21 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0350.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 29 June
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 6 []
 +
|-
 +
  
  
Line 475: Line 548:
 
| C78/2236, no. 14 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0075.htm]
 
| C78/2236, no. 14 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0075.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 4 July
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 7 []
 +
|-
 +
  
  
Line 484: Line 568:
 
| In the matter of the Railway Companies Act 1867 in relation to the Cambrian Railways Company: a purported scheme of arrangement
 
| In the matter of the Railway Companies Act 1867 in relation to the Cambrian Railways Company: a purported scheme of arrangement
 
| C78/2235, no. 22 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0363.htm]
 
| C78/2235, no. 22 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0363.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 8 July
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 8 []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 11 July
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 9 []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 11 July
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 10 []
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 494: Line 608:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| C78/2236, no. 15 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0078.htm]
 
| C78/2236, no. 15 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0078.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 16 July
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 11 []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 17 July
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 12 []
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 504: Line 638:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| C78/2236, no. 16 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0085.htm]
 
| C78/2236, no. 16 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0085.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 19 July
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 13 []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 19 July
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 18 []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 23 July
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 14 []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 25 July
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 15 []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 29 July
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 23 []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 31 July
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 19 []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 2 Nov
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 20 []
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 516: Line 720:
 
|-
 
|-
  
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 4 Nov
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 21 []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 22 Nov
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 22 []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 23 Nov
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2237, no. 16 []
 +
|-
  
  

Revision as of 01:33, 30 September 2014

Overall C78 page [1]

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1872 C78/, no. []
1872 2 Jan Alfred Hudson Dodwell v. Clement Matthew Uzielli In the matter of the estate of Theodosius Uzielli late of Threadneedle Street, London, merchant deceased C78/2233, no. 19 [2]
1872 15 Jan Frederick George harding and Joseph Maddox v. The Metropolitan Railway Company C78/2235, no. 14 [3]
1872 18 Jan Samuel Walker v. Robert Gerrard and John Henry Smallpage C78/2235, no. 1 [4]
1872 20 Jan Ludwig George Barber; John Harry Blumberg Barber; Charles Frederick William Barber; Alfred Victor Blumberg; Annie Jane Charlotte Blumberg; George Henry Blumberg; Rosalie Mary Victoria Blumberg; May Frederika Blumberg; Sydney Edward Blumberg; and Marie Amelia Blumberg infants by Alfred Octavius Kirby their next friend v. John Barber & Mary Alexandrine Barber his wife; George Frederick Blumberg & Rosalie Susannah Jane Blumberg his wife; Victor Ludwig Alexander Blumberg; Henry John Blumberg; and Jane Wetherell Blumberg C78/2235, no. 15 [5]
1872 23 Jan Ann Richmond widow v. William Richmond; David Gwynne; John Reynellt the younger; John Price & Jane his wife C78/2235, no. 2 [6]
1872 27 Jan Henry Buonaparte Anderson v. George Anderson and Henry Letts C78/2234, no. 4 [7]
1872 29 Jan Thomas Dixon v. Caesar Lamare C78/2234, no. 10 [8]
1872 29 Jan Robert Cory Hanrott v. David Halett and Erskine Humphreys C78/2236, no. 3 [9]
1872 14 Feb William Hooper v. Robert Henry Pearson C78/2236, no. 4 [10]
1872 15 Feb Job Butler Hudson v. William Cook and Henry Sidney Cook C78/2236, no. 5 [11]
1872 16 Feb John Edward Bartlett v. William Robert Rees; Francis Whitaker; Sarah Roupell the elder; Richard roupell; Sarah Roupell the younger; Edward Thomas Whitaker; Frederic Thomas Woolbert; Frederick Chinnock; Frederick Thomas Galsworthy; John Tredwell; William Henry Hewitt; George Thomas Woodrooffe; James Cordery; and The Attorney General C78/2234, no. 5 [12]
1872 19 Feb William Henry Beaumont and Alfred Page v. Edgar Brewer; Edward Bagnall Dimmack; and John Thompson C78/2234, no. 8 [13]
1872 22 Feb George Thomas Selby v. Joseph Henry Nettlefold and Joseph Chamberlain C78/2233, no. 26 [14]
1872 23 Feb Henry Lavile v. George Kilner and William Kilner C78/2233, no. 27 [15]
1872 23 Feb Mary Ann Miller widow and caleb Chandler on behalf of themselves and the mortgagees of the undertaking of the Somerset and Dorset Railway Company and of the tolls and sums of money arising upon or out of the same by virtue of the several acts relating thereto v. The Somerset and Dorset Railway Company C78/2236, no. 6 [16]
1872 1 March John William Allen of no. 17 Carlisle Street, Soho, Middx, gentleman In the matter of an Act of Parliament of 56 George III to authorise the transferring stock upon which dividends shall remain unclaimed for the space of at least ten years at the Bank of England and also all lottery prizes or benefits and balances of sums issued for paying the principals of stock or annuities in relation to the trusts of the will of James Ackland C78/2234, no. 6 [17]
1872 4 March David Thomas v. Jenkin Jones Thomas C78/2233, no. 28 [18]
1872 4 March Archibald Hamilton and Felix Jones; Anne Hector the wife of the defendant Alexander Hector by Robert Hamilton her next friend and Ida Rector; Alexander Hector the younger; Annie Hector and Mary Hector infants by the said Robert Hamilton their next friend v. Alexander Hector C78/2236, no. 7 [19]
1872 7 March Townsend Wilson and Arthur Thomas Stephens v. John O'Leary; Henry O'Leary; and Philip Alexander Hughes C78/2235, no. 18 [20]
1872 9 March Charles Telford the younger v. The Metropolitan Board of Works; Beriah Brew; and Philip William Flower C78/2235, no. 3 [21]
1872 13 March Charles Henry Robert of no. 15 Newington Causeway, Surrey, linen draper, a contributory of the Company named below In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 and 1867 in relation to the Imperial Land Company of Marseilles Limited C78/2236, no. 8 [22]
1872 15 March James Rymer In the matter of the Companies Acts 1862 and 1867 in relation to The Worthing Royal Sea House Hotel Company Limited C78/2235, no. 4 [23]
1872 15 March William Jackson v. The Brighton Aquarium Company; George Somes; Lord William Pitt Lennox; Francis Francis William Stevens; Michael Alfred Reed; and Eugenia Birch C78/2235, no. 5 [24]
1872 16 March The Attorney General on behalf of Her Majesty and of all person entitled to right of common on the commonable waste lands of the manor of Wimbledon, Surrey; and Charles Barker v. The Wimbledon Local Board and John Poyntz earl Spencer and The Wimbledon and utney Commons Conservators C78/2235, no. 6 [25]
1872 19 March Susan Sutcliffe v. John Richardson; James Ashworth; and John Edwards Hill C78/2235, no. 7 [26]
1872 20 March C78/2237, no. 1 []
1872 16 April Mence Wilkinson and Isabella Anna Mince his wife v. Mary Charlotte Pocock widow; Lewis Pocock; and John Birks Pigott C78/2235, no. 8 [27]
1872 18 April William Jackson v. The Brighton Aquarium Company; George Somes; Lord William Pitt Lennox; Francis Francis William Stevens; Michael Alfred Reid; and Eugenius Birch C78/2235, no. 9 [28]
1872 19 April C78/2237, no. 17 []
1872 22 April The Attorney General by the relation of the Commissioners of Sewers of the City of London and the Commissioners of Sewers of London v. The Great Eastern Railway Company C78/2235, no. 10 [29]
1872 25 April Arthur McNutt Wier v. John Tucker C78/2236, no. 18 [30]
1872 26 April Ann Smith v. George Smith; Jemima Eaton; Anne maria Smith; and Richard Fletcher Smith; George Thomas Smith; William Smith; Ada Smith; Charles Smith; Henry Smith; Marion Smith; and Sydney Smith respectively infants C78/2236, no. 19 [31]
1872 29 April C78/2237, no. 2 []
1872 30 April James Ward of Shearness, Kent, solicitor In the matter of George Lewis Phipps Eyre and Archibald Soctt Lawson solicitors of the said court C78/2235, no. 12 [32]
1872 2 May Charles Bray v. George Briggs C78/2235, no. 11 [33]
1872 2 May Robert Henry Pearson v. William Hooper and Edmund Cordery C78/2235, no. 19 [34]
1872 2 May Francis Webb; John Hibberd Brewer; and Frederick James Hale v. Edward Hart; John Beattie; Henry George Robinson out of the jurisdiction; Maria Dawson; Thomas Gibbs; and George Stagg C78/2236, no. 20 [35]
1872 8 May Frances Mary Agnes Moorat; Anna Mary Josephine Moorat; Edward Francis Joseph Moorat; and Henry Edward Moorat severally infants by Adolphus Frederick James Jerningham their next friend v. Samuel Moorat; Edward Moorat; Edward Ratchael; and George Gretton\ In the matter of the estate of John Samuel Moorat late of Bush Hill Park, Middx, and 21 Gloucester Square, Hyde Park, Middx, esq C78/2236, no. 9 [36]
1872 23 May Mary Matilda Talbot v. Bartle John Lawrie Frere and William Stewart Forster C78/2235, no. 20 [37]
1872 5 June Pierre Alfred Lariviere v. Junius Spencer Morgan; Charles Cubitt Gooch; Ernest Bellot des minieres out of the jurisdiction; The French Republic out of the jurisdiction; and Gustave Adolphe Cannot C78/2236, no. 10 [38]
1872 7 June Sir Roger Charles Doughty Tichborne baronet v. The Honorable Teresa Mary Josephine Doughty Tichborne widow; The Honorable William Stourton Renfrie Arundell; Edward Hopkins and Roger Joseph Doughty Tichborne; and Henry Alfred Joseph Doughty Tichborne severally infants C78/2236, no. 21 [39]
1872 11 June C78/2237, no. 3 []
1872 12 June Rachel Wyburn of no. 66 Harley Street, Middx, widow In the matter of James Fluker one of the solicitors of Chancery C78/2235, no. 13 [40]
1872 12 June James Carr Fisher v. Elizabeth Webster; Daniel Cole & Mary his wife out of the jurisdiction; John Newton & Mehetabel his wife; William Digby & Sarah Ann his wife; James Digby; Benjamin Digby; James Nokes Spurgeon; Joseph Spurgeon & Rebecca Ann his wife; Abigail Spurgeon; Abraham Franklin & Rachael Brown his wife; Christopher Cardinall Digby & Eliza Nokes his wife; Sarah Spurgeon widow; and William Prior C78/2235, no. 16 [41]
1872 12 June Sir Roger Charles Doughty Tichborne baronet v. The Honorable Teresa Mary Josephine Doughty Tichborne widow; The Honorable William Stourton Renfrie Arundell; Edward Hopkins and Roger Joseph Doughty Tichborne; and Henry Alfred Joseph Doughty Tichborne severally infants C78/2236, no. 22 [42]
1872 19 June Sir Roger Charles Doughty Tichborne baronet v. Sir Pyers Mostyn baronet; William moslyn; Vincent Gosford; Edward Hopkins; The Honorable Teresa Mary Josephine Doughty Tichborne widow; The Honorable William Stourton Renfrie Arundell; Edward Hopkins and Roger Joseph Doughty Tichborne; and Henry Alfred Joseph Doughty Tichborne severally infants C78/2236, no. 23 [43]
1872 20 June C78/2237, no. 4 []
1872 22 June Abraham Hodgson Phillpots; William de Winton; Anthony Temple; Frederick Francis; and Thomas Salt five of the directors of the Brecon and Merthyr Tydfil Junction Railway Company In the matter of the Railway Companies Act 1867 in relation to the Brecon and Merthyr Tydfil Junction Railway Company: a purported scheme of arrangement C78/2236, no. 12 [44]
1872 24 June C78/2237, no. 5 []
1872 28 June Matthew Henry Marsh of Ramridge, Andover, Hants, esq, chairman; Thomas Pain of Basingstoke, Hants, gentleman; Octavius Munanney of no 1 Great Winchester Street, London, gentleman; and Elias Pitts Squarey Odstock, Wilts, gentleman being the chairman and a majority of the directors of the company named below In the matter of the Railway Companies Act 1867 in relation to the Salisbury and Dorset Junction Railway Company: a purported scheme of arrangement C78/2235, no. 21 [45]
1872 29 June C78/2237, no. 6 []
1872 3 July Henry Burlton & Caroline his wife; Thomas William Carpenter; and the said Henry Burlton and George Thomas Woodroffe and Joseph Plaskett In the matter of the Lands Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 in relation to the estate of John Carpenden C78/2236, no. 13 [46]
1872 3 July Marion Collyer widow v. Thomas Waterman; and William Henry Rowland and Marion Emily Laura Collyer; Andrew Collyer; and Willie Bristow Collyer infants C78/2236, no. 14 [47]
1872 4 July C78/2237, no. 7 []
1872 6 July The Right Honorable earl Vane; Samuel Edward Bolden; Robert Davies Pryce; Jasper Wilson Johns; Henry Gartside; James Alexander Mann; The Honorable Robert Charles Herbert; George Henry Loxdale; and William McAndrew being the major part of the directors of the campany named below In the matter of the Railway Companies Act 1867 in relation to the Cambrian Railways Company: a purported scheme of arrangement C78/2235, no. 22 [48]
1872 8 July C78/2237, no. 8 []
1872 11 July C78/2237, no. 9 []
1872 11 July C78/2237, no. 10 []
1872 16 July John Catton otherwise Smith v. Richard Young and Thomas Young C78/2236, no. 15 [49]
1872 16 July C78/2237, no. 11 []
1872 17 July C78/2237, no. 12 []
1872 18 July Samuel Avery v. Frederick Charsley C78/2236, no. 16 [50]
1872 19 July C78/2237, no. 13 []
1872 19 July C78/2237, no. 18 []
1872 23 July C78/2237, no. 14 []
1872 25 July C78/2237, no. 15 []
1872 29 July C78/2237, no. 23 []
1872 31 July C78/2237, no. 19 []
1872 2 Nov C78/2237, no. 20 []
1872 4 Nov Emily Smart, Mary Hemmings; and Ann Shueman otherwise Emily Carly and Anne Carly v. Rose Tevlin; Philip Caffrey;Margaret Dillon; Denis Carly; Ellen Lamb; Edward Hennefoy; Eliza Hennefoy his wife; Richard Riggs; and Rose Riggs Case in the court of Chancery in Ireland C78/2236, no. 17 [51]
1872 4 Nov C78/2237, no. 21 []
1872 22 Nov C78/2237, no. 22 []
1872 23 Nov C78/2237, no. 16 []
1872 C78/, no. []