Difference between revisions of "C78 1872"

From Waalt
Line 28: Line 28:
 
| C78/2233, no. 19 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2233/IMG_0093.htm]
 
| C78/2233, no. 19 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2233/IMG_0093.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 15 Jan
 +
|
 +
| Frederick George harding and Joseph Maddox v. The Metropolitan Railway Company
 +
|
 +
| C78/2235, no. 14 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0306.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 18 Jan
 +
|
 +
| Samuel Walker v. Robert Gerrard and John Henry Smallpage
 +
|
 +
| C78/2235, no. 1 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0258.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 20 Jan
 +
|
 +
| Ludwig George Barber; John Harry Blumberg Barber; Charles Frederick William Barber; Alfred Victor Blumberg; Annie Jane Charlotte Blumberg; George Henry Blumberg; Rosalie Mary Victoria Blumberg; May Frederika Blumberg; Sydney Edward Blumberg; and Marie Amelia Blumberg infants by Alfred Octavius Kirby their next friend v. John Barber & Mary Alexandrine Barber his wife; George Frederick Blumberg & Rosalie Susannah Jane Blumberg his wife; Victor Ludwig  Alexander Blumberg; Henry John Blumberg; and Jane Wetherell Blumberg
 +
|
 +
| C78/2235, no. 15 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0310.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 23 Jan
 +
|
 +
| Ann Richmond widow v. William Richmond; David Gwynne; John Reynellt the younger; John Price & Jane his wife
 +
|
 +
| C78/2235, no. 2 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0262.htm]
 +
|-
 +
  
  
Line 104: Line 144:
 
| C78/2233, no. 28 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2233/IMG_0135.htm]
 
| C78/2233, no. 28 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2233/IMG_0135.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 9 Mar
 +
|
 +
| Charles Telford the younger v. The Metropolitan Board of Works; Beriah Brew; and Philip William Flower
 +
|
 +
| C78/2235, no. 3 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0266.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 15 Mar
 +
|
 +
| James Rymer
 +
| In the matter of the Companies Acts 1862 and 1867 in relation to The Worthing Royal Sea House Hotel Company Limited
 +
| C78/2235, no. 4 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0270.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 15 Mar
 +
|
 +
| William Jackson v. The Brighton Aquarium Company; George Somes; Lord William Pitt Lennox; Francis Francis William Stevens; Michael Alfred Reed; and Eugenia Birch
 +
|
 +
| C78/2235, no. 5 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0272.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 16 Mar
 +
|
 +
| The Attorney General on behalf of Her Majesty and of all person entitled to right of common on the commonable waste lands of the manor of Wimbledon, Surrey; and Charles Barker v. The Wimbledon Local Board and John Poyntz earl Spencer and The Wimbledon and utney Commons Conservators
 +
|
 +
| C78/2235, no. 6 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0276.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 19 Mar
 +
|
 +
| Susan Sutcliffe v. John Richardson; James Ashworth; and John Edwards Hill
 +
|
 +
| C78/2235, no. 7 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0282.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 16 Apr
 +
|
 +
| Mence Wilkinson and Isabella Anna Mince his wife v. Mary Charlotte Pocock widow; Lewis Pocock; and John Birks Pigott
 +
|
 +
| C78/2235, no. 8 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0286.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 18 Apr
 +
|
 +
| William Jackson v. The Brighton Aquarium Company; George Somes; Lord William Pitt Lennox; Francis Francis William Stevens; Michael Alfred Reid; and Eugenius Birch
 +
|
 +
| C78/2235, no. 9 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0292.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 22 Apr
 +
|
 +
| The Attorney General by the relation of the Commissioners of Sewers of the City of London and the Commissioners of Sewers of London v. The Great Eastern Railway Company
 +
|
 +
| C78/2235, no. 10 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0295.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 30 Apr
 +
|
 +
| James Ward of Shearness, Kent, solicitor
 +
| In the matter of George Lewis Phipps Eyre and Archibald Soctt Lawson solicitors of the said court
 +
| C78/2235, no. 12 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0300.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 2 May
 +
|
 +
| Charles Bray v. George Briggs
 +
|
 +
| C78/2235, no. 11 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0298.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 12 June
 +
|
 +
| Rachel Wyburn of no. 66 Harley Street, Middx, widow
 +
| In the matter of James Fluker one of the solicitors of Chancery
 +
| C78/2235, no. 13 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0303.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 12 June
 +
|
 +
| James Carr Fisher v. Elizabeth Webster; Daniel Cole & Mary his wife out of the jurisdiction; John Newton & Mehetabel his wife; William Digby & Sarah Ann his wife; James Digby; Benjamin Digby; James Nokes Spurgeon; Joseph Spurgeon & Rebecca Ann his wife; Abigail Spurgeon; Abraham Franklin & Rachael Brown his wife; Christopher Cardinall Digby & Eliza Nokes his wife; Sarah Spurgeon widow; and William Prior
 +
|
 +
| C78/2235, no. 16 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0318.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1872
 +
| 25 June
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2235, no. 17 []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
  
 
! 1872
 
! 1872

Revision as of 19:09, 29 September 2014

Overall C78 page [1]

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1872 C78/, no. []
1872 2 Jan Alfred Hudson Dodwell v. Clement Matthew Uzielli In the matter of the estate of Theodosius Uzielli late of Threadneedle Street, London, merchant deceased C78/2233, no. 19 [2]
1872 15 Jan Frederick George harding and Joseph Maddox v. The Metropolitan Railway Company C78/2235, no. 14 [3]
1872 18 Jan Samuel Walker v. Robert Gerrard and John Henry Smallpage C78/2235, no. 1 [4]
1872 20 Jan Ludwig George Barber; John Harry Blumberg Barber; Charles Frederick William Barber; Alfred Victor Blumberg; Annie Jane Charlotte Blumberg; George Henry Blumberg; Rosalie Mary Victoria Blumberg; May Frederika Blumberg; Sydney Edward Blumberg; and Marie Amelia Blumberg infants by Alfred Octavius Kirby their next friend v. John Barber & Mary Alexandrine Barber his wife; George Frederick Blumberg & Rosalie Susannah Jane Blumberg his wife; Victor Ludwig Alexander Blumberg; Henry John Blumberg; and Jane Wetherell Blumberg C78/2235, no. 15 [5]
1872 23 Jan Ann Richmond widow v. William Richmond; David Gwynne; John Reynellt the younger; John Price & Jane his wife C78/2235, no. 2 [6]
1872 27 Jan Henry Buonaparte Anderson v. George Anderson and Henry Letts C78/2234, no. 4 [7]
1872 29 Jan Thomas Dixon v. Caesar Lamare C78/2234, no. 10 [8]
1872 16 Feb John Edward Bartlett v. William Robert Rees; Francis Whitaker; Sarah Roupell the elder; Richard roupell; Sarah Roupell the younger; Edward Thomas Whitaker; Frederic Thomas Woolbert; Frederick Chinnock; Frederick Thomas Galsworthy; John Tredwell; William Henry Hewitt; George Thomas Woodrooffe; James Cordery; and The Attorney General C78/2234, no. 5 [9]
1872 19 Feb William Henry Beaumont and Alfred Page v. Edgar Brewer; Edward Bagnall Dimmack; and John Thompson C78/2234, no. 8 [10]
1872 22 Feb George Thomas Selby v. Joseph Henry Nettlefold and Joseph Chamberlain C78/2233, no. 26 [11]
1872 23 Feb Henry Lavile v. George Kilner and William Kilner C78/2233, no. 27 [12]
1872 1 March John William Allen of no. 17 Carlisle Street, Soho, Middx, gentleman In the matter of an Act of Parliament of 56 George III to authorise the transferring stock upon which dividends shall remain unclaimed for the space of at least ten years at the Bank of England and also all lottery prizes or benefits and balances of sums issued for paying the principals of stock or annuities in relation to the trusts of the will of James Ackland C78/2234, no. 6 [13]
1872 4 March David Thomas v. Jenkin Jones Thomas C78/2233, no. 28 [14]
1872 9 Mar Charles Telford the younger v. The Metropolitan Board of Works; Beriah Brew; and Philip William Flower C78/2235, no. 3 [15]
1872 15 Mar James Rymer In the matter of the Companies Acts 1862 and 1867 in relation to The Worthing Royal Sea House Hotel Company Limited C78/2235, no. 4 [16]
1872 15 Mar William Jackson v. The Brighton Aquarium Company; George Somes; Lord William Pitt Lennox; Francis Francis William Stevens; Michael Alfred Reed; and Eugenia Birch C78/2235, no. 5 [17]
1872 16 Mar The Attorney General on behalf of Her Majesty and of all person entitled to right of common on the commonable waste lands of the manor of Wimbledon, Surrey; and Charles Barker v. The Wimbledon Local Board and John Poyntz earl Spencer and The Wimbledon and utney Commons Conservators C78/2235, no. 6 [18]
1872 19 Mar Susan Sutcliffe v. John Richardson; James Ashworth; and John Edwards Hill C78/2235, no. 7 [19]
1872 16 Apr Mence Wilkinson and Isabella Anna Mince his wife v. Mary Charlotte Pocock widow; Lewis Pocock; and John Birks Pigott C78/2235, no. 8 [20]
1872 18 Apr William Jackson v. The Brighton Aquarium Company; George Somes; Lord William Pitt Lennox; Francis Francis William Stevens; Michael Alfred Reid; and Eugenius Birch C78/2235, no. 9 [21]
1872 22 Apr The Attorney General by the relation of the Commissioners of Sewers of the City of London and the Commissioners of Sewers of London v. The Great Eastern Railway Company C78/2235, no. 10 [22]
1872 30 Apr James Ward of Shearness, Kent, solicitor In the matter of George Lewis Phipps Eyre and Archibald Soctt Lawson solicitors of the said court C78/2235, no. 12 [23]
1872 2 May Charles Bray v. George Briggs C78/2235, no. 11 [24]
1872 12 June Rachel Wyburn of no. 66 Harley Street, Middx, widow In the matter of James Fluker one of the solicitors of Chancery C78/2235, no. 13 [25]
1872 12 June James Carr Fisher v. Elizabeth Webster; Daniel Cole & Mary his wife out of the jurisdiction; John Newton & Mehetabel his wife; William Digby & Sarah Ann his wife; James Digby; Benjamin Digby; James Nokes Spurgeon; Joseph Spurgeon & Rebecca Ann his wife; Abigail Spurgeon; Abraham Franklin & Rachael Brown his wife; Christopher Cardinall Digby & Eliza Nokes his wife; Sarah Spurgeon widow; and William Prior C78/2235, no. 16 [26]
1872 25 June C78/2235, no. 17 []
1872 C78/, no. []