Difference between revisions of "C78 1872"
From Waalt
Line 321: | Line 321: | ||
| | | | ||
| C78/2236, no. 18 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0092.htm] | | C78/2236, no. 18 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0092.htm] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1872 | ||
+ | | 25 April | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C78/2238, no. 1 [] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 381: | Line 391: | ||
| | | | ||
| C78/2236, no. 20 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0100.htm] | | C78/2236, no. 20 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0100.htm] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1872 | ||
+ | | 6 May | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C78/2238, no. 2 [] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 402: | Line 422: | ||
| | | | ||
| C78/2235, no. 20 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0344.htm] | | C78/2235, no. 20 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2235/IMG_0344.htm] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1872 | ||
+ | | 27 May | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C78/2238, no. 3 [] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 495: | Line 525: | ||
| In the matter of the Railway Companies Act 1867 in relation to the Brecon and Merthyr Tydfil Junction Railway Company: a purported scheme of arrangement | | In the matter of the Railway Companies Act 1867 in relation to the Brecon and Merthyr Tydfil Junction Railway Company: a purported scheme of arrangement | ||
| C78/2236, no. 12 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0066.htm] | | C78/2236, no. 12 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2236/IMG_0066.htm] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1872 | ||
+ | | 22 June | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C78/2238, no. 4 [] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 505: | Line 545: | ||
| | | | ||
| C78/2237, no. 5 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2237/IMG_0149.htm] | | C78/2237, no. 5 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2237/IMG_0149.htm] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1872 | ||
+ | | 27 June | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C78/2238, no. 5 [] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 598: | Line 648: | ||
| | | | ||
| C78/2237, no. 10 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2237/IMG_0182.htm] | | C78/2237, no. 10 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2237/IMG_0182.htm] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1872 | ||
+ | | 12 July | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C78/2238, no. 6 [] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 688: | Line 748: | ||
| | | | ||
| C78/2237, no. 23 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2237/IMG_0237.htm] | | C78/2237, no. 23 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2237/IMG_0237.htm] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1872 | ||
+ | | 30 July | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C78/2238, no. 7 [] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 698: | Line 768: | ||
| | | | ||
| C78/2237, no. 19 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2237/IMG_0223.htm] | | C78/2237, no. 19 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2237/IMG_0223.htm] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1872 | ||
+ | | 2 Aug | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C78/2238, no. 8 [] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 728: | Line 808: | ||
| Case in Chancery in Ireland | | Case in Chancery in Ireland | ||
| C78/2237, no. 21 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2237/IMG_0231.htm] | | C78/2237, no. 21 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2237/IMG_0231.htm] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1872 | ||
+ | | 8 Nov | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C78/2238, no. 9 [] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 752: | Line 842: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1872 | ||
+ | | 25 Nov | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C78/2238, no. 10 [] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1872 | ||
+ | | 9 Dec | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C78/2238, no. 11 [] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1872 | ||
+ | | 10 Dec | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C78/2238, no. 12 [] | ||
+ | |- | ||
Revision as of 03:20, 30 September 2014
Overall C78 page [1]
Cal_Year | Cal_Date | Regnal_Year | Parties | Subject Matter | Roll/Case_No. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1872 | C78/, no. [] | |||||
1872 | 2 Jan | Alfred Hudson Dodwell v. Clement Matthew Uzielli | In the matter of the estate of Theodosius Uzielli late of Threadneedle Street, London, merchant deceased | C78/2233, no. 19 [2] | ||
1872 | 15 Jan | Frederick George harding and Joseph Maddox v. The Metropolitan Railway Company | C78/2235, no. 14 [3] | |||
1872 | 18 Jan | Samuel Walker v. Robert Gerrard and John Henry Smallpage | C78/2235, no. 1 [4] | |||
1872 | 20 Jan | Ludwig George Barber; John Harry Blumberg Barber; Charles Frederick William Barber; Alfred Victor Blumberg; Annie Jane Charlotte Blumberg; George Henry Blumberg; Rosalie Mary Victoria Blumberg; May Frederika Blumberg; Sydney Edward Blumberg; and Marie Amelia Blumberg infants by Alfred Octavius Kirby their next friend v. John Barber & Mary Alexandrine Barber his wife; George Frederick Blumberg & Rosalie Susannah Jane Blumberg his wife; Victor Ludwig Alexander Blumberg; Henry John Blumberg; and Jane Wetherell Blumberg | C78/2235, no. 15 [5] | |||
1872 | 23 Jan | Ann Richmond widow v. William Richmond; David Gwynne; John Reynellt the younger; John Price & Jane his wife | C78/2235, no. 2 [6] | |||
1872 | 27 Jan | Henry Buonaparte Anderson v. George Anderson and Henry Letts | C78/2234, no. 4 [7] | |||
1872 | 29 Jan | Thomas Dixon v. Caesar Lamare | C78/2234, no. 10 [8] | |||
1872 | 29 Jan | Robert Cory Hanrott v. David Halett and Erskine Humphreys | C78/2236, no. 3 [9] | |||
1872 | 14 Feb | William Hooper v. Robert Henry Pearson | C78/2236, no. 4 [10] | |||
1872 | 15 Feb | Job Butler Hudson v. William Cook and Henry Sidney Cook | C78/2236, no. 5 [11] | |||
1872 | 16 Feb | John Edward Bartlett v. William Robert Rees; Francis Whitaker; Sarah Roupell the elder; Richard roupell; Sarah Roupell the younger; Edward Thomas Whitaker; Frederic Thomas Woolbert; Frederick Chinnock; Frederick Thomas Galsworthy; John Tredwell; William Henry Hewitt; George Thomas Woodrooffe; James Cordery; and The Attorney General | C78/2234, no. 5 [12] | |||
1872 | 19 Feb | William Henry Beaumont and Alfred Page v. Edgar Brewer; Edward Bagnall Dimmack; and John Thompson | C78/2234, no. 8 [13] | |||
1872 | 22 Feb | George Thomas Selby v. Joseph Henry Nettlefold and Joseph Chamberlain | C78/2233, no. 26 [14] | |||
1872 | 23 Feb | Henry Lavile v. George Kilner and William Kilner | C78/2233, no. 27 [15] | |||
1872 | 23 Feb | Mary Ann Miller widow and caleb Chandler on behalf of themselves and the mortgagees of the undertaking of the Somerset and Dorset Railway Company and of the tolls and sums of money arising upon or out of the same by virtue of the several acts relating thereto v. The Somerset and Dorset Railway Company | C78/2236, no. 6 [16] | |||
1872 | 1 March | John William Allen of no. 17 Carlisle Street, Soho, Middx, gentleman | In the matter of an Act of Parliament of 56 George III to authorise the transferring stock upon which dividends shall remain unclaimed for the space of at least ten years at the Bank of England and also all lottery prizes or benefits and balances of sums issued for paying the principals of stock or annuities in relation to the trusts of the will of James Ackland | C78/2234, no. 6 [17] | ||
1872 | 4 March | David Thomas v. Jenkin Jones Thomas | C78/2233, no. 28 [18] | |||
1872 | 4 March | Archibald Hamilton and Felix Jones; Anne Hector the wife of the defendant Alexander Hector by Robert Hamilton her next friend and Ida Rector; Alexander Hector the younger; Annie Hector and Mary Hector infants by the said Robert Hamilton their next friend v. Alexander Hector | C78/2236, no. 7 [19] | |||
1872 | 7 March | Townsend Wilson and Arthur Thomas Stephens v. John O'Leary; Henry O'Leary; and Philip Alexander Hughes | C78/2235, no. 18 [20] | |||
1872 | 9 March | Charles Telford the younger v. The Metropolitan Board of Works; Beriah Brew; and Philip William Flower | C78/2235, no. 3 [21] | |||
1872 | 13 March | Charles Henry Robert of no. 15 Newington Causeway, Surrey, linen draper, a contributory of the Company named below | In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 and 1867 in relation to the Imperial Land Company of Marseilles Limited | C78/2236, no. 8 [22] | ||
1872 | 15 March | James Rymer | In the matter of the Companies Acts 1862 and 1867 in relation to The Worthing Royal Sea House Hotel Company Limited | C78/2235, no. 4 [23] | ||
1872 | 15 March | William Jackson v. The Brighton Aquarium Company; George Somes; Lord William Pitt Lennox; Francis Francis William Stevens; Michael Alfred Reed; and Eugenia Birch | C78/2235, no. 5 [24] | |||
1872 | 16 March | The Attorney General on behalf of Her Majesty and of all person entitled to right of common on the commonable waste lands of the manor of Wimbledon, Surrey; and Charles Barker v. The Wimbledon Local Board and John Poyntz earl Spencer and The Wimbledon and utney Commons Conservators | C78/2235, no. 6 [25] | |||
1872 | 19 March | Susan Sutcliffe v. John Richardson; James Ashworth; and John Edwards Hill | C78/2235, no. 7 [26] | |||
1872 | 20 March | Ann Loysel widow and Paul Freeth Loysel an infant by the said Ann Loysell his mother v. Charles Freeth; Thomas Jacob Freeth; and Mary Annette Freeth | C78/2237, no. 1 [27] | |||
1872 | 16 April | Mence Wilkinson and Isabella Anna Mince his wife v. Mary Charlotte Pocock widow; Lewis Pocock; and John Birks Pigott | C78/2235, no. 8 [28] | |||
1872 | 18 April | William Jackson v. The Brighton Aquarium Company; George Somes; Lord William Pitt Lennox; Francis Francis William Stevens; Michael Alfred Reid; and Eugenius Birch | C78/2235, no. 9 [29] | |||
1872 | 19 April | William Hayes & Mary his wife v. William Henry Catley since deceased; James Farmer Jones (called James Farmer); The Reverend Joshua Bennett clerk; and Thomas Howells Thursfield | C78/2237, no. 17 [30] | |||
1872 | 22 April | The Attorney General by the relation of the Commissioners of Sewers of the City of London and the Commissioners of Sewers of London v. The Great Eastern Railway Company | C78/2235, no. 10 [31] | |||
1872 | 25 April | Arthur McNutt Wier v. John Tucker | C78/2236, no. 18 [32] | |||
1872 | 25 April | C78/2238, no. 1 [] | ||||
1872 | 26 April | Ann Smith v. George Smith; Jemima Eaton; Anne maria Smith; and Richard Fletcher Smith; George Thomas Smith; William Smith; Ada Smith; Charles Smith; Henry Smith; Marion Smith; and Sydney Smith respectively infants | C78/2236, no. 19 [33] | |||
1872 | 29 April | The Wardens and Commonalty of the Mystery of Mercers, London v. The Metropolitan Board of Works | C78/2237, no. 2 [34] | |||
1872 | 30 April | James Ward of Shearness, Kent, solicitor | In the matter of George Lewis Phipps Eyre and Archibald Soctt Lawson solicitors of the said court | C78/2235, no. 12 [35] | ||
1872 | 2 May | Charles Bray v. George Briggs | C78/2235, no. 11 [36] | |||
1872 | 2 May | Robert Henry Pearson v. William Hooper and Edmund Cordery | C78/2235, no. 19 [37] | |||
1872 | 2 May | Francis Webb; John Hibberd Brewer; and Frederick James Hale v. Edward Hart; John Beattie; Henry George Robinson out of the jurisdiction; Maria Dawson; Thomas Gibbs; and George Stagg | C78/2236, no. 20 [38] | |||
1872 | 6 May | C78/2238, no. 2 [] | ||||
1872 | 8 May | Frances Mary Agnes Moorat; Anna Mary Josephine Moorat; Edward Francis Joseph Moorat; and Henry Edward Moorat severally infants by Adolphus Frederick James Jerningham their next friend v. Samuel Moorat; Edward Moorat; Edward Ratchael; and George Gretton\ | In the matter of the estate of John Samuel Moorat late of Bush Hill Park, Middx, and 21 Gloucester Square, Hyde Park, Middx, esq | C78/2236, no. 9 [39] | ||
1872 | 23 May | Mary Matilda Talbot v. Bartle John Lawrie Frere and William Stewart Forster | C78/2235, no. 20 [40] | |||
1872 | 27 May | C78/2238, no. 3 [] | ||||
1872 | 5 June | Pierre Alfred Lariviere v. Junius Spencer Morgan; Charles Cubitt Gooch; Ernest Bellot des minieres out of the jurisdiction; The French Republic out of the jurisdiction; and Gustave Adolphe Cannot | C78/2236, no. 10 [41] | |||
1872 | 7 June | Sir Roger Charles Doughty Tichborne baronet v. The Honorable Teresa Mary Josephine Doughty Tichborne widow; The Honorable William Stourton Renfrie Arundell; Edward Hopkins and Roger Joseph Doughty Tichborne; and Henry Alfred Joseph Doughty Tichborne severally infants | C78/2236, no. 21 [42] | |||
1872 | 11 June | James Harris & Martha his wife v. Harriet Ann Wild; John Wild Rouse; Richard Wild Burgoyne; and Robert Todd Burgoyne | C78/2237, no. 3 [43] | |||
1872 | 12 June | Rachel Wyburn of no. 66 Harley Street, Middx, widow | In the matter of James Fluker one of the solicitors of Chancery | C78/2235, no. 13 [44] | ||
1872 | 12 June | James Carr Fisher v. Elizabeth Webster; Daniel Cole & Mary his wife out of the jurisdiction; John Newton & Mehetabel his wife; William Digby & Sarah Ann his wife; James Digby; Benjamin Digby; James Nokes Spurgeon; Joseph Spurgeon & Rebecca Ann his wife; Abigail Spurgeon; Abraham Franklin & Rachael Brown his wife; Christopher Cardinall Digby & Eliza Nokes his wife; Sarah Spurgeon widow; and William Prior | C78/2235, no. 16 [45] | |||
1872 | 12 June | Sir Roger Charles Doughty Tichborne baronet v. The Honorable Teresa Mary Josephine Doughty Tichborne widow; The Honorable William Stourton Renfrie Arundell; Edward Hopkins and Roger Joseph Doughty Tichborne; and Henry Alfred Joseph Doughty Tichborne severally infants | C78/2236, no. 22 [46] | |||
1872 | 19 June | Sir Roger Charles Doughty Tichborne baronet v. Sir Pyers Mostyn baronet; William moslyn; Vincent Gosford; Edward Hopkins; The Honorable Teresa Mary Josephine Doughty Tichborne widow; The Honorable William Stourton Renfrie Arundell; Edward Hopkins and Roger Joseph Doughty Tichborne; and Henry Alfred Joseph Doughty Tichborne severally infants | C78/2236, no. 23 [47] | |||
1872 | 20 June | Frederick Smith v. Julia Nutt | C78/2237, no. 4 [48] | |||
1872 | 22 June | Abraham Hodgson Phillpots; William de Winton; Anthony Temple; Frederick Francis; and Thomas Salt five of the directors of the Brecon and Merthyr Tydfil Junction Railway Company | In the matter of the Railway Companies Act 1867 in relation to the Brecon and Merthyr Tydfil Junction Railway Company: a purported scheme of arrangement | C78/2236, no. 12 [49] | ||
1872 | 22 June | C78/2238, no. 4 [] | ||||
1872 | 24 June | Walter Thornhill and John Langton Sanford v. Percy Burrell | C78/2237, no. 5 [50] | |||
1872 | 27 June | C78/2238, no. 5 [] | ||||
1872 | 28 June | Matthew Henry Marsh of Ramridge, Andover, Hants, esq, chairman; Thomas Pain of Basingstoke, Hants, gentleman; Octavius Munanney of no 1 Great Winchester Street, London, gentleman; and Elias Pitts Squarey Odstock, Wilts, gentleman being the chairman and a majority of the directors of the company named below | In the matter of the Railway Companies Act 1867 in relation to the Salisbury and Dorset Junction Railway Company: a purported scheme of arrangement | C78/2235, no. 21 [51] | ||
1872 | 29 June | Sir Roger Charles Doughty Tichborne v. Sir Pyers Mostyn baronet; William Moslyn; Vincent Gosford; Edward Hopkins; The Honorable Teresa Mary Josephine Doughty Tichborne widow; The Honorable William Stourton; Roger Joseph Doughty Tichborne; and Henry Alfred Joseph Doughty Tichborne severally infants; and Francis Fortescue turville out of the jurisdiction | C78/2237, no. 6 [52] | |||
1872 | 3 July | Henry Burlton & Caroline his wife; Thomas William Carpenter; and the said Henry Burlton and George Thomas Woodroffe and Joseph Plaskett | In the matter of the Lands Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 in relation to the estate of John Carpenden | C78/2236, no. 13 [53] | ||
1872 | 3 July | Marion Collyer widow v. Thomas Waterman; and William Henry Rowland and Marion Emily Laura Collyer; Andrew Collyer; and Willie Bristow Collyer infants | C78/2236, no. 14 [54] | |||
1872 | 4 July | Benjamin Powis v. James Adams | C78/2237, no. 7 [55] | |||
1872 | 6 July | The Right Honorable earl Vane; Samuel Edward Bolden; Robert Davies Pryce; Jasper Wilson Johns; Henry Gartside; James Alexander Mann; The Honorable Robert Charles Herbert; George Henry Loxdale; and William McAndrew being the major part of the directors of the campany named below | In the matter of the Railway Companies Act 1867 in relation to the Cambrian Railways Company: a purported scheme of arrangement | C78/2235, no. 22 [56] | ||
1872 | 8 July | Walter Hart v. Henry Shaw | C78/2237, no. 8 [57] | |||
1872 | 11 July | George Ernest John Powell v. William Edward Phelp; Thomas John Stafford Hotchkin; Henry Somerset Todd; George Holland; Ackers Price Lewes; and William Thomas Rowland Powell | C78/2237, no. 9 [58] | |||
1872 | 11 July | George Ernest John Powell v. William Edward Phelp; Thomas John Stafford Hotchkin; Henry Somerset Todd; George Holland; Ackers Price Lewes; and William Thomas Rowland Powell | C78/2237, no. 10 [59] | |||
1872 | 12 July | C78/2238, no. 6 [] | ||||
1872 | 16 July | John Catton otherwise Smith v. Richard Young and Thomas Young | C78/2236, no. 15 [60] | |||
1872 | 16 July | Thomas Campbell Eyton of Eyton, Salop, esq; Thomas Wynne of Stone, Staffs, gentleman; and John Taylor of 50 Warwick Gardens, Kensington, Middx, gentleman being the chairman and the majority of the directors of the company named below | In the matter of the Railways Companies Act 1867 in relation to The Stafford and Uttoxeter Railway Company: a scheme of arrangement | C78/2237, no. 11 [61] | ||
1872 | 17 July | Thomas Brassey since deceased and John Towlerton Leather v. The Saint Thomas Floating Dock Comany Limited; Frederick Joseph Bramwell; Norman Scott Russell; Frederick George Finch; Sidney Howard; and Charles Fitch Kemp | C78/2237, no. 12 [62] | |||
1872 | 18 July | Samuel Avery v. Frederick Charsley | C78/2236, no. 16 [63] | |||
1872 | 19 July | The Reverend Francis Edmund Hutchinson; Nassau John senior; and Charles Turner Simpson v. The Metropolitan District Railway Company and George Hopwood their secretary; and Josiah Harvey | C78/2237, no. 13 [64] | |||
1872 | 19 July | Plampin Jennings Harvey v. Charles Jannings; Henry Spain (the trustee of the property of Henry Jannings a bankrupt); Ann Kersey; Benjamin William Harvey; John Robert Kay; and Simon Hyam (creditors assignees of Benjamin William Harvey a bankrupt); William Henry Passmore & Ellen Ford his wife; and Walter Harvey | C78/2237, no. 18 [65] | |||
1872 | 23 July | William Mack v. George William Petter and Thomas Dixon Galpin | C78/2237, no. 14 [66] | |||
1872 | 25 July | Benjamin Pickering v. William Fox Chapman | C78/2237, no. 15 [67] | |||
1872 | 29 July | John Beattie; John Arthur Burton; and John Chapman v. The Right Honorable the lord Ebury; The Honorable Reginald Algernon Capel; The Honorable Robert Wrottesly Grosvenor otherwise Robert Wellesley Grosvenor; Joseph Cary; John Henry Dillon; Alexander Forbes; and The Watford and Rickmansworth Railway Company | C78/2237, no. 23 [68] | |||
1872 | 30 July | C78/2238, no. 7 [] | ||||
1872 | 31 July | William Lucas Merry v. Patteson Nickalls | C78/2237, no. 19 [69] | |||
1872 | 2 Aug | C78/2238, no. 8 [] | ||||
1872 | 2 Nov | Robert Edmund Mellersh v. Henry Faulkner & Emily Lucy his wife | C78/2237, no. 20 [70] | |||
1872 | 4 Nov | Emily Smart, Mary Hemmings; and Ann Shueman otherwise Emily Carly and Anne Carly v. Rose Tevlin; Philip Caffrey;Margaret Dillon; Denis Carly; Ellen Lamb; Edward Hennefoy; Eliza Hennefoy his wife; Richard Riggs; and Rose Riggs | Case in the court of Chancery in Ireland | C78/2236, no. 17 [71] | ||
1872 | 4 Nov | Robert Hazleton & Helen his wife v. Samuel Bright executor of William McCurdy deceased and Kate his wife; and John McCurdy | Case in Chancery in Ireland | C78/2237, no. 21 [72] | ||
1872 | 8 Nov | C78/2238, no. 9 [] | ||||
1872 | 22 Nov | Thomas Harris v. Robert Barrett | C78/2237, no. 22 [73] | |||
1872 | 23 Nov | Charles John Foster v. William Francis Foster; Frederick Halsey Samson Charles Rolls Foster; Edward Taverner Foster; Waltger Foster; and Rose Foster an infant by Henry Foster her guardian | C78/2237, no. 16 [74] | |||
1872 | 25 Nov | C78/2238, no. 10 [] | ||||
1872 | 9 Dec | C78/2238, no. 11 [] | ||||
1872 | 10 Dec | C78/2238, no. 12 [] | ||||
1872 | C78/, no. [] |