Difference between revisions of "C78 1868"

From Waalt
Line 37: Line 37:
 
| In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 in relation to the Shields Marine Insurance Association South Shields and of the Shields Marine Cargo Freight and Outfit Association South Shields
 
| In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 in relation to the Shields Marine Insurance Association South Shields and of the Shields Marine Cargo Freight and Outfit Association South Shields
 
| C78/2211, no. 16 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2211/IMG_0700.htm]
 
| C78/2211, no. 16 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2211/IMG_0700.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1868
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2215, no.  []
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 145: Line 155:
 
| C78/2213, no. 13 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2213/IMG_0177.htm]
 
| C78/2213, no. 13 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2213/IMG_0177.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1868
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2215, no.  []
 +
|-
 +
  
  
Line 383: Line 404:
 
| C78/2215, no. 6 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2215/IMG_0403.htm]
 
| C78/2215, no. 6 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2215/IMG_0403.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1868
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2215, no.  []
 +
|-
 +
  
  
Line 446: Line 478:
 
| C78/2215, no. 7 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2215/IMG_0417.htm]
 
| C78/2215, no. 7 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2215/IMG_0417.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1868
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2215, no.  []
 +
|-
 +
  
  
Line 468: Line 511:
 
| C78/2215, no. 8 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2215/IMG_0419.htm]
 
| C78/2215, no. 8 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2215/IMG_0419.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1868
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2215, no.  []
 +
|-
 +
  
  
Line 478: Line 532:
 
| C78/2214, no. 8 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2214/IMG_0329.htm]
 
| C78/2214, no. 8 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2214/IMG_0329.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1868
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2215, no.  []
 +
|-
 +
  
  
Line 575: Line 640:
 
| C78/2214, no. 15 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2214/IMG_0352.htm]
 
| C78/2214, no. 15 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2214/IMG_0352.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1868
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2215, no.  []
 +
|-
 +
  
  
Line 597: Line 673:
 
| C78/2214, no. 17 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2214/IMG_0364.htm]
 
| C78/2214, no. 17 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2214/IMG_0364.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1868
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2215, no.  []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1868
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2215, no.  []
 +
|-
 +
  
  
Line 618: Line 716:
 
| C78/2214, no. 18 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2214/IMG_0366.htm]
 
| C78/2214, no. 18 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2214/IMG_0366.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1868
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| C78/2215, no.  []
 +
|-
 +
  
  

Revision as of 18:49, 23 September 2014

Overall C78 page [1]

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1868 C78/, no. []
1868 11 Jan The Shields Marine Insurance Association South Shields and William Anderson; George Davison Hall; John Laurence Hall; John Nicholson; Francis Robinson; Francis Edward Anderson; Jonathan Reaveley; John Bell; and John Marchbank all of South Shields, Durham, ship owners In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 in relation to the Shields Marine Insurance Association South Shields and of the Shields Marine Cargo Freight and Outfit Association South Shields C78/2211, no. [2]
1868 11 Jan The Shields Marine Insurance Association South Shields and William Anderson; George Davison Hall; John Lawrence Hall; John Nicholson; Francis Robinson; Francis Edward Anderson; Jonathan Reaveley; John Bell; and John Marchbank all of South Shields, Durham, ship owners In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 in relation to the Shields Marine Insurance Association South Shields and of the Shields Marine Cargo Freight and Outfit Association South Shields C78/2211, no. 16 [3]
1868 C78/2215, no. []
1868 16 Jan George Lathom Browne In the matter the Companies Act 1862 in relation to The New Zealand Banking Corporation Limited C78/2213, no. 9 [4]
1868 22 Jan James McRae and John McRae v. the London Brighton and South Coast Railway Company C78/2211, no. 17 [5]
1868 25 Jan James Dawson; Joseph Silvester; Godfrey Alexander Hoyes; Edward Gellatly; John Gillespie; and Jasper William Johns In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 in relation to The Joint Stock Discount Company (Limited) C78/2212, no. 14 [6]
1868 27 Jan james Hazell & Georgiana his wife; and Henry Charles Berkeley an infant by William James Hazell his special guardian v. Charles Jaques; John Abraham; and Alfred Baker; ___ Tourling; and Sarah Hubbard C78/2213, no. 10 [7]
1868 31 Jan Alexander Semple and Horace John Semple v. Robert Morris; David Jacobs; Thomas Darlow; John Fitch; and Noel Edgar Fitch C78/2211, no. 18 [8]
1868 7 Feb Ronald Lefevre Dickson Prole and Charlotte Augusta Dickson Prole v. Thomas Eales Loady since deceased; and Dickson Milliken & Earles Loady late his wife since deceased; and Archibald Colin Campbell Kenton since deceased; and John Turnbull; William Watson Prole; and The Reverend George Fulton knight out of the jurisdiction C78/2212, no. 15 [9]
1868 7 Feb Thomas Mason Johnson v. James Henry D'Arcy Foulds; William Crook & Mary his wife; Robert Tillotson & Margaret his wife; and Hartley Pilling C78/2213, no. 11 [10]
1868 8 Feb Thomas Armstrong v. Joseph Swan; Richard John Butler Ward; Annie Mary Swan administratrix with will annexed of Thomas Percival Swan; Frances Ward; Anne Julianna Ward; and Edwarda Wilhelmina Ward Case in the High Court of Chancery in Ireland C78/2210, no. 18 [11]
1868 8 Feb William Betts v. James Neilson; William Middleton Tennent; James Marshall and David Hill Young C78/2212, no. 16 [12]
1868 8 Feb William Betts v. James Denis de Vitre; William Henry Dickson; John Dunnington Fletcher; Alexander Lany Elder; James Lawrie; Thomas Napier Johnstone and Winshursts Patent Metal Foil and Sheet Metal Company Limited C78/2213, no. 12 [13]
1868 8 Feb William Betts v. James Denis de Vitre; William Henry Dickson; John Dunnington Fletcher; Alexander Lany Elder; James Lawrie; Thomas Napier Johnstone and Winshursts Patent Metal Foil and Sheet Metal Company Limited C78/2213, no. 13 [14]
1868 C78/2215, no. []
1868 12 Feb Thomas Stephenson v. Frederick Haigh & Septima his wife; James Edward Yeadon & Keziah Sarah his wife; Edweard Ackroyd & Sarah his wife; George Craddock & Elizabeth his wife; John Edward Ackroyd; Margaret Hannah Ackroyd; Margaret Elizabeth Yeadon; and John Yeadon C78/2212, no. 2 [15]
1868 12 Feb William Worthington and Charles John Clay the duly registered public Officers of The Burton Uttoxeter and Ashbowin Union Bank on behalf of that Company v. William German; Robert Fraser the Younger & Isabella Ann his wife; Elizabeth McLeod; Augusta McLeod; Gordon McLeod when within the jurisdiction; and Henry Havelock Basford C78/2213, no. 14 [16]
1868 12 Feb The Official Liquidator of the Brighton Brewery Company Limited In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 in relation to the Brighton Brewery Company Limited C78/2213, no. 15 [17]
1868 13 Feb Frederick Borham Smart of 58 Gresham Street, London, accountant; and Henry Lawrence Hammack of 59 Bishopsgate Street, London, architect repectively members and contibutories of the Limited Company named below In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 in relation to The Prince of Wales Slate Company Limited C78/2212, no. 3 [18]
1868 17 Feb Andrew Ellis and Eliza Martin wife of John Thomas Richard Martin by the said Andrew Ellis her next friend v. Christopher Nickry Bridgman; John Hitchins & Elizabeth his wife; Theophilus Carrick; John Benson; and John Thomas Richard martin C78/2212, no. 4 [19]
1868 17 Feb William Smith v. Louisa Herningham; Christina Weld; Catherine Blundell; Georgiana Roberts; and Julia Pike C78/2212, no. 5 [20]
1868 21 Feb Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins v. John Jefferies Stone; and the Zoological Society of London C78/2213, no. 16 [21]
1868 22 Feb In the matter of Companies Act 1862 in relation to The Contract Corporation Limited C78/2212, no. 1 [22]
1868 4 March George Grey Rous; George Gore; and John capel Hanbury an infant by the said George Grey Rous his next friend v. The Ebbw Vale Company Limited and The Great Western Railway Company C78/2212, no. 17 [23]
1868 10 March Henry Hall; James Holcroft; John Pearson; William Pearson; and John Price v. James Evers Swindell; Charles Evers Swindell; Frank Evers; Walter Chamberlain Hemming; Theodore Moilliet; and Theodore Howard Galton C78/2213, no. 17 [24]
1868 12 March Henry Thring and James Hodgson v. Caroline Lee and James Robert Steadman Sayer when he come into the jurisdiction C78/2213, no. 18 [25]
1868 13 March Walter Butler of no. 15 Blenheim Crescent Notting Hill, Middx, gentleman In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 in relation to the London and Mediterranean Bank Limited C78/2213, no. 19 [26]
1868 17 March Edward Denison; William Beckett Denison; and John Metcalfe Smith all of Leeds, Yorks, bankers v. The Reverend William Alfred Tattershall; Owen Caregan & Eliza Jane Caregan his wife; John Cropper & Mary Cropper his wife C78/2212, no. 6 [27]
1868 20 March Richard Clifford Smith and Thomas Darwell v. Alexander Hordern; John Bickerton Deakin; George Samuel Fereday Smith; and Frederick Smith C78/2212, no. 18 [28]
1868 16 April John Augustus Beaumont and James Walton Weldon v. Edward John Johnston; George Cobb Ledger since deceased; Benjamin Olivera; Alexander Olivera; Willliam Ward Sprigge; Ellen Philadelphia Sprigge wife of the said William Ward Sprigge; John William Ede; Peter Bartholomew Long; Emma Olivera; The Royal Geographical Society; Reginald Thistlethwayte Cocks; and Emma Hephzibath Olivera widow C78/2212, no. 19 [29]
1868 16 April George Stagg v. Edward Hart C78/2212, no. 20 [30]
1868 16 April William Chapman; Raymond Alexander Duncan Anderson; and Thomas Richard White v. Jasper Lakeman & Charlotte Mary his wife; Wintour Harris & Mary Anne his wife; William Thmas Miskin & Caroline Creak his wife; Algernon Perkins; Henry Thomas Young; Mary YHoung; and Rosalind Ada Young; and Thomas Benjamin Young infants C78/2214, no. 1 [31]
1868 17 April John Robert Thomson v. Walter Blandford Waterlow C78/2212, no. 21 [32]
1868 20 April William Ridley Carr v. William Benson and The Right Honorable Henry lord Rokeby C78/2215, no. 1 [33]
1868 21 April Alfred Baumann and David Baumann v. Demetrius Wyndham Greves James C78/2212, no. 22 [34]
1868 21 April Sir George de la Poer Beresford baronet v. Robert Tennant C78/2213, no. 20 [35]
1868 22 April Joseph William Evans v. James Wyley; William Webb since deceased; Henry Heane since deceased; Ann Eliza Evans widow; Benjamin Morton & Ann Elizabeth his wife; Sarah Jane Evans spinster an infant; and Brooke Hector Smallwood C78/2213, no. 21 [36]
1868 22 April Henry Grissell v. George Henry Money (lieutenant colonel of the North East London Rifles (Sixth Tower Hamlets Rifle Volunteers) C78/2213, no. 22 [37]
1868 22 April Walter Strickland; Elizabeth Strickland spinster; The Reverend Henry Fitzgerald; Elizabeth Mary Cotterell Strickland widow; Colin Campbell Baillie & Anne Catherine his wife; The Reverend William Cecil Fowle; The Reverend Edward Cookson & Eleanor Labina his wife; The Marchese Teodoro Covelo Strozzi & Georgiana his wife; Augustus Edmund Christopher Strickland; and Lydia Constantia Stow widow C78/2215, no. 6 [38]
1868 C78/2215, no. []
1868 25 April Alfred Daniel Chapman and James Fletcher v. John Paton Watson and George Watson Coutts C78/2214, no. 2 [39]
1868 28 April John Stevens v. Henry Robertson and James Earl C78/2214, no. 3 [40]
1868 28 April Messieurs Charles Walford Kellock and Company of Liverpool, Lancs, ship owners In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 in relation to Barneds Banking Company Limited C78/2214, no. 4 [41]
1868 30 April Edwin Bull of Holles Street, Cavendish Square, Middx, architect In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 in relation to The Continental Bank Corporation Limited C78/2214, no. 5 [42]
1868 2 May Samuel Simpson v. Luke Charlsworth In the matter of the estate of John Charlesworth late of Sheffield, Yorks, contractor C78/2214, no. 6 [43]
1868 6 May Charlotte Mary Dering widow v. Roger Kynaston; The Honorable Berkeley Wodehouse; Nora Jane Benet; and Edward William Wallace Dering; and Lionel Ashton Dering the two last named infants by Charles Edward Michel their special guardian C78/2215, no. 7 [44]
1868 C78/2215, no. []
1868 7 May Francis Fuller of Whitehall Gardens, Wesminster, land agent; Martin Andrew Sharp of St Helens Place, London, esq; and Robert Hume of Bemers Street, Middx, esq, three of the Directors of the company below In the matter of the Railway Companies Act 1867 in relation to the Hayling Railway Company C78/2214, no. 7 [45]
1868 9 May The Potteries Shrewsbury and North Wales Railway Company In the matter of the Companies Act 1867 in relation to the Potteries Shrewsbury and North Wales Railway purporting to be scheme of arrangement C78/2215, no. 8 [46]
1868 C78/2215, no. []
1868 26 May Ebenezer Ball Brown v. James Robert Collett C78/2214, no. 8 [47]
1868 C78/2215, no. []
1868 28 May Jane Mary Ann Kiver widow v. The Tottenham and Hampstead Junction Railway Company C78/2214, no. 9 [48]
1868 29 May John Curling v. William Dimsdale Child C78/2214, no. 10 [49]
1868 29 May Charles Joseph Corbett v. The Commissioners of Her Majesty's Works and Public Buildings C78/2214, no. 11 [50]
1868 30 May The Devon and Somerset Railway Company In the matter of the Companies Act 1867 in relation to the Devon and Somerset Rialway Company purporting ot be a scheme of arrangement C78/2214, no. 12 [51]
1868 4 June William Henry Eglin v. William Dryden; Theophilus Carrick; Anthony Bannister; and Augustus Kaufmann & Josephine his wife when they come into the jurisdiction C78/2215, no. 2 [52]
1868 5 June Robert Henderson v. William Gascoigne Roy; The London Brighton and South Coast Railway Company; Leo Selmeter; and the London and South Western Railway Company C78/2214, no. 13 [53]
1868 5 June Charles Hay Frewen v. The Local Board of Health in and for the District of Hastings, Sussex C78/2215, no. 3 [54]
1868 8 June The Honorable Alexander Nelson Hood and George Arthur Feruson v. The Right Honorable George William viscount Barrington C78/2214, no. 14 [55]
1868 8 June The Right Honorable Elizabeth William countess of Harrington v. The Right Honorable Charles Wyndham earl of Harrington; The Most Noble William duke of Bedford; The Right Honorable Thomas Henry baron; Foley Charles Kemilly; and George Russell C78/2214, no. 15 [56]
1868 C78/2215, no. []
1868 11 June Messieurs Charles Walford Kellock and Company of Liverpool, Lancs, ship owners In the matter of the Companies Act 1862 in relation to Barneds Banking Company Limited C78/2214, no. 16 [57]
1868 12 June The Imperial Bank of China, India, and Japan Limited; Robert Montgomery Martin; and james Brookbank Higgs v. The Bank of Hindustan, China, and Japan Limited and Roger Swire Tomlin C78/2214, no. 17 [58]
1868 C78/2215, no. []
1868 C78/2215, no. []
1868 23 June Mary Franks v. William Bollans; and James Haigh & Sarah his wife; and Elizabeth smith C78/2215, no. 4 [59]
1868 26 June Charles Henry Stagland v. George Gardner; William Thomas Gardner; Louisa Gardner; Adelaide Maria Louisa Gardner; and Alice Maud Gardner all infants; William Cowles; and James Jackson C78/2214, no. 18 [60]
1868 C78/2215, no. []
1868 6 July Frederick Hancorn Walford v. Herbert Henry Walford and Thomas Sturgis Walford C78/2214, no. 19 [61]
1868 9 July William Sparks v. William Henry Gregg C78/2214, no. 20 [62]
1868 16 July Richard Dodderidge Blackmore v. The London and South Western Railway Company and George Clement C78/2215, no. 5 [63]
1868 C78/, no. []