Difference between revisions of "C78 1867"

From Waalt
Line 37: Line 37:
 
|-
 
|-
  
 +
 +
! 1867
 +
| 12 Jan
 +
|
 +
| Hugh Culling Eardley Childers and Godfrey Lushington v. Sir Eardley Gideon Culling Eardley baronet; Dame Emily Florence Montgomery wife of the said Sir Eardley Gideon Culling Eardley; Joseph Eglese; William James Thomas; John Campbell Dicker; and the Attorney General
 +
|
 +
| C78/2206, no. 16 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2206/IMG_0110.htm]
 +
|-
  
 
! 1867
 
! 1867
Line 46: Line 54:
 
|-
 
|-
  
 +
 +
 +
! 1867
 +
| 16 Jan
 +
|
 +
| Thomas Smith v. Alfredo George Smith
 +
|
 +
| C78/2206, no. 17 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2206/IMG_0115.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
! 1867
 +
| 29 Jan
 +
|
 +
| The Right Honorable Archibald William earl of Eglinton and Winton; Sir Frederick Leopold Arthur baronet; and Henry Danby Seymour v. Sir Charles Montolieu Lamb baronet
 +
|
 +
| C78/2206, no. 18 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2206/IMG_0119.htm]
 +
|-
  
 
! 1867
 
! 1867

Revision as of 03:50, 21 September 2014

Overall C78 page [1]

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1867 C78/, no. []
1867 11 Jan Edward Raphael; Thomas Barnett; and Henry William Birch v. The Thames Valley Railway Company and William Ben; Nicholas Green C78/2206, no. 14 [2]
1867 12 Jan John Muddelle In the matter of the Companys Act 1862 in relation to the Marine Estates Company Limited C78/2206, no. 15 [3]
1867 12 Jan Hugh Culling Eardley Childers and Godfrey Lushington v. Sir Eardley Gideon Culling Eardley baronet; Dame Emily Florence Montgomery wife of the said Sir Eardley Gideon Culling Eardley; Joseph Eglese; William James Thomas; John Campbell Dicker; and the Attorney General C78/2206, no. 16 [4]
1867 16 Jan The Attorney General at the relation of Robert Needham Philips v. The Right Reverend Thomas Buckley clerk since deceased; The Reverend Thomas Daniel Cox Morse clerk incumbent of the parish of Stretford; The dean and canons of the Cathedral Church of Manchester; John Bradshaw; and the Ecclesiastical Commissioners for England; The Reverend Charles Frederick Buckley clerk; Edward Akroyd; and the Reverend William Doyle clerk C78/2055, no. 14 [5]
1867 16 Jan Thomas Smith v. Alfredo George Smith C78/2206, no. 17 [6]
1867 29 Jan The Right Honorable Archibald William earl of Eglinton and Winton; Sir Frederick Leopold Arthur baronet; and Henry Danby Seymour v. Sir Charles Montolieu Lamb baronet C78/2206, no. 18 [7]
1867 C78/, no. []