Difference between revisions of "C78 1864"

From Waalt
Line 130: Line 130:
  
 
! 1864
 
! 1864
 +
| 18 April
 
|  
 
|  
 +
| Andrew Hosegood v. John Haine
 
|  
 
|  
|
+
| C78/2193, no. 7 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2193/IMG_0390.htm]
|
 
| C78/, no. []
 
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 140: Line 140:
  
 
! 1864
 
! 1864
 +
| 25 April
 
|  
 
|  
 +
| Thomas Theaker v. Helen Ridgway Mellor and Hugh Brown
 
|  
 
|  
|
+
| C78/2193, no. 8 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2193/IMG_0394.htm]
|
 
| C78/, no. []
 
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 150: Line 150:
  
 
! 1864
 
! 1864
 +
| 27 April
 
|  
 
|  
 +
| William Henry Cooke and Clifton Benbow on behalf of themselves and unsatisfied creditors of John Bradly Benbow deceased v. John Benow and Eliza Benbow
 
|  
 
|  
|
+
| C78/2193, no. 9 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2193/IMG_0396.htm]
|
 
| C78/, no. []
 
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 160: Line 160:
  
 
! 1864
 
! 1864
 +
| 30 April
 
|  
 
|  
 +
| Arthur le Blanc; Joseph Beaumont; and Charles Smale v. Giles Redmayne; William Randall; henry Everingham; Frederick William Remnant; William Ansell Day; James William Wenn; and George Heatchcott
 
|  
 
|  
|
+
| C78/2193, no. 10 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2193/IMG_0400.htm]
|
 
| C78/, no. []
 
 
|-
 
|-
  

Revision as of 23:00, 17 September 2014

Overall C78 page [1]

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1864 C78/, no. []
1864 12 Jan Richard Pierce Barker; Herny Raine Barker; and Pauline Barker v. Henry Young; Henry Earle; John James; Richard William Jennings; Priscilla Ryland widow; and Francis Coust Barker C78/2190, no. 13 [2]
1864 16 Jan The Attorney General v. The Sittingbourne and Sheerness Railway Company and Frederick Leese C78/2192, no. 10 [3]
1864 26 Jan William Shand Low v. James innes and John Innes the younger C78/2193, no. 4 [4]
1864 29 Jan Charles Wilson Brown & Patience his wife by Richard Lawrence her next friend v. Charles Rann Kennedy and James Reid C78/2192, no. 11 [5]
1864 30 Jan Richard Rooke Michell v. Henry Hocking; the Reverend John Hocking Hocking clerk; Robert Hichens Bamfield; The Reverend Joseph Henry Turrell clerk; and Honor Warrin Turrell his wife; and Eleanor Adams Hocking; Mary Altera Hocking; and Adela Hocking infants C78/2192, no. 12 [6]
1864 16 Feb William Lawrence; Samuel Lawrence; Elizabeth Gilbert Lawrence spinster; Thomas Thatcher; Josiah Hill & Sarah his wife C78/2192, no. 13 [7]
1864 20 Feb The West Somerset Railway Company In the Matter of Robert Baxter; Philip Rose; Henry Elland; Norton Markham Spofforth; Robert Dudley Baxter; and Henry Rose all of them solicitors of the Chancery and copartners C78/2190, no. 14 [8]
1864 23 Feb Mary Hughes widow v. John Jones & Eliza his wife and David Davies C78/2192, no. 14 [9]
1864 27 Feb Matthew Curtis; George Farr; and William Madeley since deceased v. John Hall; William Frederick Palmer; Edmund Hartley; and William Richardson C78/2192, no. 15 [10]
1864 5 March William Shand Low v. James Innes and John Innes the younger C78/2193, no. 3 [11]
1864 13 April Emily MacKenzie widow v. Anne Elwood; James Elwood; George Waller Vesey; and John Grey Porter C78/2193, no. 5 [12]
1864 14 April Louisa Coster widow v. William Henry Giles Kingston; Thomas Oliver Walls Coster; Robert Warner Wheeler; The Reverend John Baron & Sophia Mary his wife; Mary Ann Wheeler spinster; and Emma Maria Wheeler spinster C78/2193, no. 6 [13]
1864 18 April Andrew Hosegood v. John Haine C78/2193, no. 7 [14]
1864 25 April Thomas Theaker v. Helen Ridgway Mellor and Hugh Brown C78/2193, no. 8 [15]
1864 27 April William Henry Cooke and Clifton Benbow on behalf of themselves and unsatisfied creditors of John Bradly Benbow deceased v. John Benow and Eliza Benbow C78/2193, no. 9 [16]
1864 30 April Arthur le Blanc; Joseph Beaumont; and Charles Smale v. Giles Redmayne; William Randall; henry Everingham; Frederick William Remnant; William Ansell Day; James William Wenn; and George Heatchcott C78/2193, no. 10 [17]
1864 C78/, no. []
1864 C78/, no. []
1864 C78/, no. []