Difference between revisions of "C78 1862"
From Waalt
Line 201: | Line 201: | ||
| | | | ||
| C78/2185, no. 10 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2185/IMG_0422.htm] | | C78/2185, no. 10 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2185/IMG_0422.htm] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1862 | ||
+ | | 12 May | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Attorney General at the relation of the Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild M.P. and the said Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild v. The Wardens and Commonalty of the Mystery of Mercers in the City of London and Henry Eugene Barnes; William Harrington; the Reverend Charlton Lane; The Reverend Markland Barnard; John Shuttleworth; Nathaniel Newnham; Charles Frederick Johnson; and Thomas Watney | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C78/2185, no. 21 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2185/IMG_0492.htm] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Revision as of 18:34, 15 September 2014
Overall C78 page [1]
Cal_Year | Cal_Date | Regnal_Year | Parties | Subject Matter | Roll/Case_No. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1862 | C78/, no. [] | |||||
1862 | 11 Jan | Emily Mary Hunt the wife of Richard Hunt by George Westrup her next friend and the said George Westrup and Robert John Westrup v. Richard Hunt | C78/2184, no. 7 [2] | |||
1862 | 11 Jan | Sarah Roche v. Jabez Roche | C78/2185, no. 11 [3] | |||
1862 | 13 Jan | Peter Rolt v. The Attorney General | C78/2184, no. 8 [4] | |||
1862 | 20 Jan | Donald McLarty the elder v. | C78/2185, no. 2 [5] | |||
1862 | 22 Jan | Samuel Lancaster v. Sir Humphrey de Trafford baronet | C78/2185, no. 3 [6] | |||
1862 | 24 Jan | Charlotte Luard widow; Jane Gainham Luard spinster; Mary Ann Garnham Luard spinster; and Helen Garnham Luard spinster v. Jacob Howell Pattison; Edward Luard Wollaston; Abraham Charles Reeve; Frederick William Newman; William Garnham Luard; Frederick John Ross; Lawrence John Bawtree the younger; James Inglis; George Henry Darby; Lawrence Lancelot; Llewellyn Haslope; Thomas Garnham Luard; Howell Pattison; Lewis Blood; William Mordeford Bramston; John Trant Barmston; Frederick Luard Wollaston; Edward Newman Reeve; William henry Luard Pattisson; Joseph Howell Blood; Guy Bryan the younger; Percival Wilmot Bryan; and Bixby Luard | C78/2184, no. 19 [7] | |||
1862 | 31 Jan | James Henry Mollett v. William Frederick Collins and Samuel Boulade and Joachim Espelon | C78/2185, no. 8 [8] | |||
1862 | 10 Feb | Samuel Tildesley v. Frederick Scipio Clarkson | C78/2184, no. 17 [9] | |||
1862 | 11 Feb | The Leather Cloth Company Limited v. John Bussey and George Pratt | C78/2185, no. 9 [10] | |||
1862 | 11 Feb | Nicholas Heald; Stephen Symonds; and Nathaniel Shelmerdine; and The Lancashire Insurance Company v. Samuel Hay | C78/2185, no. 12 [11] | |||
1862 | 13 Feb | The River Fergus Navigation and Embankment Company v. Charles Staunton Cahill; Robert Bishop; Francis Duffield; Alfred Pott; Anthony Peck; and William Bardwell | C78/2184, no. 14 [12] | |||
1862 | 22 Feb | John Crossley; Joseph Crossley; and Francis Crossley v. Henry Secks Dixon | C78/2184, no. 18 [13] | |||
1862 | 25 Feb | John Tilleard and John Labouchere | C78/2185, no. 4 [14] | |||
1862 | 26 Feb | The London and North Western Railway Company v. William Ackroyd; Thomas Ackroyd; George Ackroyd; and the Right Honorable William Walter, earl of Dartmouth | C78/2185, no. 5 [15] | |||
1862 | 18 March | The Reverend Charles Barter Sweet v. The Reverend Robert Fitzgerald Meredith clerk | C78/2185, no. 13 [16] | |||
1862 | 15 April | The Reverend Rowley Hill Gleck v. Elizabeth Pottsfen (in the bill Elizabeth Ratley otherwise Potts) | C78/2184, no. 20 [17] | |||
1862 | 16 April | Stephen Stubbing on behalf of himself and all creditors of Robert Fisher late of Great Wilbraham, Cambs, who contribute to the suit v. Eliza Fisher | C78/2185, no. 6 [18] | |||
1862 | 22 March | The Reverend Thomas Hornby; The Reverend Lewis Frederick Thomas; The Reverend William Clementson; and the Reverend James Hassell v. The Burial Board for the extra parochial place of Toxteth Park, Surrey | C78/2185, no. 14 [19] | |||
1862 | 15 April | Benjamin Jones v. Michael Pike | C78/2185, no. 15 [20] | |||
1862 | 3 May | Thomas Washer Gibbs; Mary Bryant Gibbs spinster; Ann Gibbs spinster; and Richard Drewett Robsart & Florence Elizabeth his wife v. Edward Daniel and Alfred Cox | C78/2185, no. 10 [21] | |||
1862 | 12 May | Attorney General at the relation of the Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild M.P. and the said Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild v. The Wardens and Commonalty of the Mystery of Mercers in the City of London and Henry Eugene Barnes; William Harrington; the Reverend Charlton Lane; The Reverend Markland Barnard; John Shuttleworth; Nathaniel Newnham; Charles Frederick Johnson; and Thomas Watney | C78/2185, no. 21 [22] | |||
1862 | 27 May | Charles Edward Lewis v. Greenwood Poole & Marianne Eleanora Charlotte his wife | C78/2185, no. 7 [23] | |||
1862 | 29 May | Giles Meek v. William Bayliss | C78/2185, no. 16 [24] | |||
1862 | 3 June | In the matter of the Joint Stock Companies Acts 1856, 1857 and the Joint Stock Companies Act 1858 in relation to the Risen Coal and Iron Company | C78/2185, no. 17 [25] | |||
1862 | 11 June | James Lillie v. Charles Richard Banastre Legh | C78/2185, no. 18 [26] | |||
1862 | 3 July | Peter Henry Berthon and William Tooke v. John Robert Chidley | C78/2185, no. 19 [27] | |||
1862 | C78/, no. [] |