Difference between revisions of "C78 1862"

From Waalt
Line 37: Line 37:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| C78/2184, no. 8 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2184/IMG_0287.htm]
 
| C78/2184, no. 8 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2184/IMG_0287.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
! 1862
 +
| 24 Jan
 +
|
 +
| Charlotte Luard widow; Jane Gainham Luard spinster; Mary Ann Garnham Luard spinster; and Helen Garnham Luard spinster v. Jacob Howell Pattison; Edward Luard Wollaston; Abraham Charles Reeve; Frederick William Newman; William Garnham Luard; Frederick John Ross; Lawrence John Bawtree the younger; James Inglis; George Henry Darby; Lawrence Lancelot; Llewellyn Haslope; Thomas Garnham Luard; Howell Pattison; Lewis Blood; William Mordeford Bramston; John Trant Barmston; Frederick Luard Wollaston; Edward Newman Reeve; William henry Luard Pattisson; Joseph Howell Blood; Guy Bryan the younger; Percival Wilmot Bryan; and Bixby Luard
 +
|
 +
| C78/2184, no. 19 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2184/IMG_0364.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
  

Revision as of 15:55, 15 September 2014

Overall C78 page [1]

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1862 C78/, no. []
1862 11 Jan Emily Mary Hunt the wife of Richard Hunt by George Westrup her next friend and the said George Westrup and Robert John Westrup v. Richard Hunt C78/2184, no. 7 [2]
1862 13 Jan Peter Rolt v. The Attorney General C78/2184, no. 8 [3]
1862 24 Jan Charlotte Luard widow; Jane Gainham Luard spinster; Mary Ann Garnham Luard spinster; and Helen Garnham Luard spinster v. Jacob Howell Pattison; Edward Luard Wollaston; Abraham Charles Reeve; Frederick William Newman; William Garnham Luard; Frederick John Ross; Lawrence John Bawtree the younger; James Inglis; George Henry Darby; Lawrence Lancelot; Llewellyn Haslope; Thomas Garnham Luard; Howell Pattison; Lewis Blood; William Mordeford Bramston; John Trant Barmston; Frederick Luard Wollaston; Edward Newman Reeve; William henry Luard Pattisson; Joseph Howell Blood; Guy Bryan the younger; Percival Wilmot Bryan; and Bixby Luard C78/2184, no. 19 [4]
1862 10 Feb Samuel Tildesley v. Frederick Scipio Clarkson C78/2184, no. 17 [5]
1862 13 Feb The River Fergus Navigation and Embankment Company v. Charles Staunton Cahill; Robert Bishop; Francis Duffield; Alfred Pott; Anthony Peck; and William Bardwell C78/2184, no. 14 [6]
1862 22 Feb John Crossley; Joseph Crossley; and Francis Crossley v. Henry Secks Dixon C78/2184, no. 18 [7]
1862 C78/, no. []