Difference between revisions of "C78 1855"

From Waalt
Line 55: Line 55:
 
|-
 
|-
  
 +
 +
 +
! 1855
 +
| 24 Jan
 +
|
 +
| Constantia Tunaley v. William Eaton Mousley and John Hardcastle Mousley
 +
|
 +
| C78/2154, no. 5 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2154/IMG_0775.htm]
 +
|-
  
  

Revision as of 21:10, 1 September 2014

Overall C78 page [1]

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1855 C78/, no. []
1855 17 Jan Attorney General v. The Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses of the Town of Beverley, Yorkshire C78/2154, no. 2 [2]
1855 17 Jan James Wickenden; Richard Wildish; and james Fishenden v. Mary Rayson widow; Thomas Hurley & Ann Hurley his wife; Mary Rayson spinster; John Henry Rayson; Edward Rayson; John Homan the younger; Robert Smith; and George Brindley Acworth vacated by order of 20 June 1855 C78/2154, no. 3 [3]
1855 18 Jan Ann Catherine Jortin widow v. The South Eastern Railway Company C78/2154, no. 4 [4]
1855 20 Jan John Johnson v. John Longworth Clarke; James Cazenove; and Harnwood Walcot Banner C78/2153, no. 10 [5]
1855 24 Jan Constantia Tunaley v. William Eaton Mousley and John Hardcastle Mousley C78/2154, no. 5 [6]
1855 25 Jan James Burchett; James Bond; and Richard Bond which said James Burchett was the administrator and sole legal personal representative of Daniel Burchett late of Woking, Surrey, laborer who died around September 1852 and which said James Bond and Richard Bond were the administrators and legal representatives of Elizabeth Bond late of the Windsor Union Workhouse at Old Windsor, Berks, widow who died around December 1852, which said Daniel Burchett and Elizabeth Bond were the only next of kin of William Townley late of Orpington, Kent, deceased C78/2153, no. 13 [7]
1855 C78/, no. []