Difference between revisions of "C78 1827"
From Waalt
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1827 | ||
+ | | 18 June | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | Thomas Scott; Thomas Ritchie; and John Diston Powles assignees of the estate and effects of John Willis, George Morss Jukes, James Grey Jackson, and John Langley bankrupts who lately carried on the trade or business of merchants in copartnership under the stuyle or firm of Willis, Jukes, and Company in Salisbury Square, Fleet Street, London v. John Robert Wheaton and Thomas Garner Richmond | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C79/316, no. 1 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no316/IMG_0131.htm] | ||
+ | |- | ||
Revision as of 19:47, 1 September 2015
Overall C78 page [1] Major Contributor(s): Robert C. Palmer Minor Contributors please initial relevant rows |
Cal_Year | Cal_Date | Regnal_Year | Parties | Subject Matter | Roll/Case_No. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1827 | C78/, no. [] | |||||
1827 | 24 Jan | 7 | George Bengough v. Charles Lucas Edridge; Arthur Palmer; Charles Cadell Edridge; Henry Bengough; James Bengough; Henry Ricketts the younger; Richard Ricketts the younger; Ann Elizabeth Bengough; and Ann Ricketts the younger; Thomas Cadell; William Peter Lunell; John Evans Lunell; and George Lunell | C79/315, no. 4 [2] | ||
1827 | 10 Feb | 8 | Thomas Lewis and Robert Andrew Stevens v. Henry Allnutt | C79/315, no. 5 [3] | ||
1827 | 22 March | 8 | Priscilla Franks of Isleworth, Middx, widow v. Sir William Henry Cooper baronet and Dame Isabella Bell his wife | C79/315, no. 6 [4] | ||
1827 | 21 May | James Bolland; Joseph Hare; and Matthias Roops knight v. James Cathrow Disney & Ann Nelson his wife; Sir Everard Home baronet; Joseph Birch; and the Amicable Society for a perpetual assurance Office | C78/2091, no. 3 [5] | |||
1827 | 18 June | Thomas Scott; Thomas Ritchie; and John Diston Powles assignees of the estate and effects of John Willis, George Morss Jukes, James Grey Jackson, and John Langley bankrupts who lately carried on the trade or business of merchants in copartnership under the stuyle or firm of Willis, Jukes, and Company in Salisbury Square, Fleet Street, London v. John Robert Wheaton and Thomas Garner Richmond | C79/316, no. 1 [6] | |||
1827 | 3 July | James Sloper esq & Judith his wife v. Henry Fisher and Giles Fisher | C79/316, no. 2 [7] | |||
1827 | 5 July | In the matter of Margaret Meyrick and Mary Davies infants | C78/2091, no. 4 [8] | |||
1827 | 20 July | 8 | Thomas Fairthorne v. John Shepherd; James Chaplin; and James Hanley Chaplin | C79/316, no. 3 [9] | ||
1827 | 20 Nov | Frederick Richard Hodges v. Charles Green, Edmund Francis Green, Edward Brown & Catherine his wife, Henry Hatton & Annette his wife, Henry Hatton the nephew Harriet Hodges, James Alexander Hodson & Sarah his wife, and Walpole Eyre | C78/2124, no. 12 [10] | |||
1827 | 10 Dec | Lucy Crump v. Richard Sparkes, John Sparkes; and Sarah Sherlock | C78/2091, no. 2 [11] | |||
1827 | 20 Dec | William Hengham and Richard Frend v. Charles Sandys; The Reverend Edwin Sandys; Mary Sandys; John Sandys; The Reverend Godfrey Faussett; Anne Faussett; Susan Faussett; Mary Faussett; Henry Godfrey Faussett; Emma Faussett; William Walton; Sir Robert Johnson Eden baronet; and George Carter | C78/2091, no. 5 [12] | |||
1827 | 21 Dec | The Attorney General at the relation of John Camden Neild esq v. The Bank of England | C78/2091, no. 6 [13] | |||
1827 | C78/, no. [] |