Difference between revisions of "C78 1805"

Revision as of 06:45, 25 May 2018

Overall C78 page [1]

Major Contributor(s): Robert C. Palmer

Minor Contributors please initial relevant rows

Cal_Year	Cal_Date	Regnal_Year	Parties	Subject Matter	Roll/Case_No.
1805					C79/, no. []
1805??			Dame Elizabeth Ann Hippesley the wife of John Coxe Hippesley baronet by her next friend and The Honorable William Horner Stangways the second son of the late earl of Ilchester an infant by Maria countess of Ilchester his mother v. Thomas Strangways Horner; the said Sir John Coxe Hippisley baronet; and John Bishop doctor in divinity	re. will 29 Nov 1800 of Thomas Horner, all his considerable estates to his wife, now deceased. Dispute about alleged codicil dated 15 Jan 1804.	C79/290, no. 1 [2]
1805	30 Oct	46	Joseph Valentine Grimstead of Leatherhead, Surrey, esq v. James Reid; John Reid; Samuel Smith; and George Lewis		C79/290, no. 2 [3]
1805	14 Dec	46	William Turner esq v. William Morgan		C79/290, no. 3 [4]
1805					C78/, no. []

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 |
 |
-| Dame Elizabeth Ann Hippesley the wife of John Coxe Hippesley baronet by her next friend and  The Honorable William Flower Stangways the second son of the late earl of Ilchester an infant b y Maria countess of Ilchester his mother  v. Thomas Strangways Flower; the said Sir John Coxe Hippisley baronet; and John Bishop doctor in divinity
+| Dame Elizabeth Ann Hippesley the wife of John Coxe Hippesley baronet by her next friend and  The Honorable William Horner Stangways the second son of the late earl of Ilchester an infant by Maria countess of Ilchester his mother
-v. Thomas Strangways Horner
+v. Thomas Strangways Horner; the said Sir John Coxe Hippisley baronet; and John Bishop doctor in divinity
 | re. will 29 Nov 1800 of Thomas Horner, all his considerable estates to his wife, now deceased. Dispute about alleged codicil dated 15 Jan 1804.
 | C79/290, no. 1 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no290/IMG_0001.htm]