Difference between revisions of "C78 1805"

From Waalt
m
Line 25: Line 25:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| Dame Elizabeth Ann Hippesley the wife of John Coxe Hippesley baronet by her next friend and  The Honorable William Flower Stangways the second son of the late earl of Ilchester an infant b y Maria countess of Ilchester his mother  v. Thomas Strangways Flower; the said Sir John Coxe Hippisley baronet; and John Bishop doctor in divinity
 
| Dame Elizabeth Ann Hippesley the wife of John Coxe Hippesley baronet by her next friend and  The Honorable William Flower Stangways the second son of the late earl of Ilchester an infant b y Maria countess of Ilchester his mother  v. Thomas Strangways Flower; the said Sir John Coxe Hippisley baronet; and John Bishop doctor in divinity
|  
+
v. Thomas Strangways Horner
 +
| re. will 29 Nov 1800 of Thomas Horner, all his considerable estates to his wife, now deceased. Dispute about alleged codicil dated 15 Jan 1804.
 
| C79/290, no. 1 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no290/IMG_0001.htm]
 
| C79/290, no. 1 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no290/IMG_0001.htm]
 
|-
 
|-

Revision as of 06:43, 25 May 2018

Overall C78 page [1]

Major Contributor(s): Robert C. Palmer

Minor Contributors please initial relevant rows

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1805 C79/, no. []
1805?? Dame Elizabeth Ann Hippesley the wife of John Coxe Hippesley baronet by her next friend and The Honorable William Flower Stangways the second son of the late earl of Ilchester an infant b y Maria countess of Ilchester his mother v. Thomas Strangways Flower; the said Sir John Coxe Hippisley baronet; and John Bishop doctor in divinity

v. Thomas Strangways Horner

re. will 29 Nov 1800 of Thomas Horner, all his considerable estates to his wife, now deceased. Dispute about alleged codicil dated 15 Jan 1804. C79/290, no. 1 [2]
1805 30 Oct 46 Joseph Valentine Grimstead of Leatherhead, Surrey, esq v. James Reid; John Reid; Samuel Smith; and George Lewis C79/290, no. 2 [3]
1805 14 Dec 46 William Turner esq v. William Morgan C79/290, no. 3 [4]
1805 C78/, no. []