Difference between revisions of "C78 1792"

From Waalt
Line 17: Line 17:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| C79/, no.  []
 
| C79/, no.  []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1792
 +
| 29 Jan
 +
| 22
 +
| Sir Gilbert Heathcote baronet and Gilbert Heathcote his son and heir apparent and infant by the said Sir Gilbert Heathcote his guardian v. Richard Roberts; William Pepper; Peter Long; John Beasley; and William Lansdall
 +
|
 +
| C79/251, no.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no251/IMG_0121.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
  

Revision as of 20:55, 24 January 2015

Overall C78 page [1]

Major Contributor(s): Robert C. Palmer

Minor Contributors please initial relevant rows

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1792 C79/, no. []
1792 29 Jan 22 Sir Gilbert Heathcote baronet and Gilbert Heathcote his son and heir apparent and infant by the said Sir Gilbert Heathcote his guardian v. Richard Roberts; William Pepper; Peter Long; John Beasley; and William Lansdall C79/251, no. [2]
1792 7 Feb 32 William Rout of Portsmouth, Hants, victualler v. Elizabeth Dawson; Sophia Dawson; William Morgan; James Webber; and Joseph Wright C79/268, no. [3]
1792 C79/, no. []