Difference between revisions of "C78 1789"

From Waalt
Line 17: Line 17:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| C79/, no.  []
 
| C79/, no.  []
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1789
 +
| 15 Jan
 +
| 29
 +
| Richard Will gentleman v. Michael Jones & Mary his wife; Robert Robinson & Sarah his wife; David Bradshaw & Magdalen his wife; Thomas Osborne & Ann his wife; Frances Coyney; Elizabeth Coyney; Dorothy Newton; Thomas Emery & Elizabeth his wife; Catherine Coyney; Samuel Nott; and Frances Holyoake
 +
|
 +
| C79/252, no.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no252/IMG_0226.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
  

Revision as of 18:20, 24 January 2015

Overall C78 page [1]

Major Contributor(s): Robert C. Palmer

Minor Contributors please initial relevant rows

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1789 C79/, no. []
1789 15 Jan 29 Richard Will gentleman v. Michael Jones & Mary his wife; Robert Robinson & Sarah his wife; David Bradshaw & Magdalen his wife; Thomas Osborne & Ann his wife; Frances Coyney; Elizabeth Coyney; Dorothy Newton; Thomas Emery & Elizabeth his wife; Catherine Coyney; Samuel Nott; and Frances Holyoake C79/252, no. [2]
1789 3 Feb 29 Sir Gilbert Heathcote baronet and Gilbert Heathcote esq his eldest son and heir apparent an infant by his father v. Sampson Duckett; John Beasley; and Thomas Mainwaring C79/298, no. 4 [3]
1789 3 March 29 Mary Eleanor Bowes called countess of Strathmore by William Lyon v. Andrew Robinson Bowes; Henry Bourn; Thomas Goasting; William Birch; and George Stephens C79/270, no. [4]
1789 13 July 29 James Smithson esq heretofore called James Smithson Taylor v. John Stafford; James Moor; William Wilkinson; and Thomas Brewster C79/269, no. [5]