Difference between revisions of "C78 1783"

From Waalt
Line 48: Line 48:
 
|-
 
|-
  
 +
 +
 +
! 1783
 +
| 13 Dec
 +
|
 +
| Joseph Lancaster; John Bax; and John Ellill v. Samuel Nicholson
 +
|
 +
| C79/254, no.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no254/IMG_0399.htm]
 +
|-
  
  

Revision as of 17:25, 24 January 2015

Overall C78 page [1]

Major Contributor(s): Robert C. Palmer

Minor Contributors please initial relevant rows

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1783 C79/, no. []
1783 24 March 23 William Pultney esq one of the executors of Harry Pultney esq, & Francis his wife the daughter and only surviving child of James Pultney esq deceased and also cousin and heir at law of the said Harry Pultney who was only brother devisee and heir at law of the late earl of Bath who was the only son and heir at law of William Pultney esq son and heir at law of Sir William Pultney all deceased v. Henry, earl of Darlington another of the surviving executors of Harry Pulney who was entitled to all the real estate to be purchased with the then surplus of the personal estate of the said Harry Pultney which should remain after payment of his debts, financial expences, and legacies with remainder to Harry lord Barnard as his only son in tail male and William lord viscount Chetwynd; Sir Harry Burrard baronet the other surviving executors of the Harry Pultney; Harry lord viscount Barnard; the Honorable Frederick Vane brother of the said earl of Darlington who in case of the death of his said brother without issue male would be entitled to the lands to be purchased with the said surplus of the personal estate of the said Harry Pulney with remainder to his first and other sons in tail male; and Raby Vane C79/261, no. [2]
1783 6 May 23 Francis Townshend v. Joseph Draper esq & Mary his wife; Margaret Townshend spinster; John Plumb & Mary his wife; and Richard Hancock C79/277, no. [3]
1783 29 July 23 Richard Smith esq v. Thomas Plumer Byde esq C79/271, no. [4]
1783 13 Dec Joseph Lancaster; John Bax; and John Ellill v. Samuel Nicholson C79/254, no. [5]
1783 C79, no. []