Difference between revisions of "C78 1766"

From Waalt
Line 26: Line 26:
 
|  
 
|  
 
| C79/238, no.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no238/IMG_0247.htm]
 
| C79/238, no.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no238/IMG_0247.htm]
 +
|-
 +
 +
 +
 +
! 1766
 +
| 10 May
 +
| 6
 +
| Dudley Ryder an infant by Michael Baxter gentleman, which Dudley was the only son of Nathaniel Ryder  esq who was the only child of Sir Dudley Ryder knight by Dame Ann his wife and afterwards his widow v. the said Dame Ann Ryder widow and the said Nathaniel Ryder
 +
|
 +
| C79/155, no.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no155/IMG_0436.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
  

Revision as of 16:07, 25 February 2015

Overall C78 page [1]

Major Contributor(s): Robert C. Palmer

Minor Contributors please initial relevant rows

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1766 C79/, no. []
1766 3 Feb 6 William Cordwell an infant be Elizabeth Cordwell his mother v. John Mackrill esq C79/238, no. [2]
1766 10 May 6 Dudley Ryder an infant by Michael Baxter gentleman, which Dudley was the only son of Nathaniel Ryder esq who was the only child of Sir Dudley Ryder knight by Dame Ann his wife and afterwards his widow v. the said Dame Ann Ryder widow and the said Nathaniel Ryder C79/155, no. [3]
1766 5 June 6 Edward Marsh v. John Ashbury & Mary his wife C79/, no. [4]
1766 C79/, no. []