Difference between revisions of "C78 1766"
From Waalt
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| | | | ||
| C79/238, no. [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no238/IMG_0247.htm] | | C79/238, no. [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no238/IMG_0247.htm] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ! 1766 | ||
+ | | 10 May | ||
+ | | 6 | ||
+ | | Dudley Ryder an infant by Michael Baxter gentleman, which Dudley was the only son of Nathaniel Ryder esq who was the only child of Sir Dudley Ryder knight by Dame Ann his wife and afterwards his widow v. the said Dame Ann Ryder widow and the said Nathaniel Ryder | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | C79/155, no. [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no155/IMG_0436.htm] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Revision as of 16:07, 25 February 2015
Overall C78 page [1] Major Contributor(s): Robert C. Palmer Minor Contributors please initial relevant rows |
Cal_Year | Cal_Date | Regnal_Year | Parties | Subject Matter | Roll/Case_No. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1766 | C79/, no. [] | |||||
1766 | 3 Feb | 6 | William Cordwell an infant be Elizabeth Cordwell his mother v. John Mackrill esq | C79/238, no. [2] | ||
1766 | 10 May | 6 | Dudley Ryder an infant by Michael Baxter gentleman, which Dudley was the only son of Nathaniel Ryder esq who was the only child of Sir Dudley Ryder knight by Dame Ann his wife and afterwards his widow v. the said Dame Ann Ryder widow and the said Nathaniel Ryder | C79/155, no. [3] | ||
1766 | 5 June | 6 | Edward Marsh v. John Ashbury & Mary his wife | C79/, no. [4] | ||
1766 | C79/, no. [] |