Difference between revisions of "C78 1759"

From Waalt
(Sp.)
Line 43: Line 43:
 
| 1 March
 
| 1 March
 
| 32
 
| 32
| Henry Edwards & Mary his wife who was nice and heir at law of Frances Markes widow v. Mary Pike spinster; John Tatum & Catherine his wife (Mary and Catherine were nieces and devisees of Frances Markes); the Mayor and Commonalty of Salisbury; William Coles esq; Richarde Wykes gentleman since deceased; and the Attorney General
+
| Henry Edwards & Mary his wife who was niece and heir at law of Frances Markes widow v. Mary Pike spinster; John Tatum & Catherine his wife (Mary and Catherine were nieces and devisees of Frances Markes); the Mayor and Commonalty of Salisbury; William Coles esq; Richarde Wykes gentleman since deceased; and the Attorney General
 
|  
 
|  
 
| C79/221, no.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no221/IMG_0527.htm]
 
| C79/221, no.  [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no221/IMG_0527.htm]

Revision as of 18:19, 26 January 2015

Overall C78 page [1]

Major Contributor(s): Robert C. Palmer

Minor Contributors please initial relevant rows

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1759 C79/, no. []
1759 25 Jan 32 Thomas Chester esq; Staunton Degge clerk; Sydenham Foast gentleman; Benjamin Dobbins gentleman; Crispin William yeoman; Mary Williams yeoman; and William Southwell esq landowners and occupiers of lands within the parish of Almondisbury, Glouc, and the tithable places thereof C79/239, no. [2]
1759 14 Feb 32 Samuel Hart clerk & Bridget his wife; Thomas Radcliffe Banbury clerk; and Walter Denning junior v. Dorothy Cory widow C79/252, no. [3]
1759 1 March 32 Henry Edwards & Mary his wife who was niece and heir at law of Frances Markes widow v. Mary Pike spinster; John Tatum & Catherine his wife (Mary and Catherine were nieces and devisees of Frances Markes); the Mayor and Commonalty of Salisbury; William Coles esq; Richarde Wykes gentleman since deceased; and the Attorney General C79/221, no. [4]
1759 C79/, no. []