Difference between revisions of "C78 1720"

From Waalt
(3 Aug. Correct case num.)
Line 36: Line 36:
 
| Humphrey Evans gent v. William Bishop and Thomas Bishop
 
| Humphrey Evans gent v. William Bishop and Thomas Bishop
 
| The complainant as an attorney in the Westminster courts procured moneys upon security for his clients, among which was money for the redemption of a mortgage on lands in Hammersmith and Brentford with a confessed judgment for security.
 
| The complainant as an attorney in the Westminster courts procured moneys upon security for his clients, among which was money for the redemption of a mortgage on lands in Hammersmith and Brentford with a confessed judgment for security.
| C78/1301, no. 1 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no1301/IMG_0362.htm]
+
| C78/1301, no. 2 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no1301/IMG_0362.htm]
 
|-
 
|-
  
  
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 15:44, 31 August 2014

Overall C78 page [1]

Cal_Year Cal_Date Regnal_Year Parties Subject Matter Roll/Case_No.
1715 6 C78/, no. []
1715 7 C78/, no. []
1715 3 Aug 7 Humphrey Evans gent v. William Bishop and Thomas Bishop The complainant as an attorney in the Westminster courts procured moneys upon security for his clients, among which was money for the redemption of a mortgage on lands in Hammersmith and Brentford with a confessed judgment for security. C78/1301, no. 2 [2]