STAC Smith, K-P

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Smith, Lawrence

  • STAC 5/S40/24 - B A - 36 Eliz - Lawrence Smyth v William Lochard, Thomas WIgmore et al

Smith, Myles

  • STAC 5/S35/27 - B A - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire NR - Myles Smyth v William Singleton, John Sparrowe et al
  • STAC 5/S37/37 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire NR - Myles Smyth v William Spence, John Sparrowe

Smith, Margaret

  • STAC 5/S48/35 - I D - - Margaret Smith v Robert Fletcher, Richard Brockett et al

Smith, Margaret

  • STAC 5/S74/12 - I D - 31 Eliz - Margaret Smyth, George Smyth v Andrew Beeche
  • STAC 5/S24/27 - B - 35 Eliz - Margaret Smyth v John Banfylde, Hugh Rydge et al
  • STAC 5/S81/10 - B A C I D - 36 Eliz - Margaret Smyth, Edmond Smyth v George Birch, Hugh Bordman et al

Smith, Martin

  • STAC 5/S78/40 - B - 34 Eliz - Martyn Smyth, Walter Vaughan v William Danby, Humfry Allarde et al
  • STAC 5/S42/39 - A - 35 Eliz - Martin Smyth, Walter Vaughan v William Danby et al

Smith, Martin

  • STAC 5/S56/22 - B A - 35 Eliz - Martin Smith v Thomas Evans, John Barret et al

Smith, Martin

  • STAC 5/S21/34 - B A - 43 Eliz - Martin Smith v Ralph Heathcote, Hugh Davies
  • STAC 5/S53/5 - I D - 44 Eliz - Martyn Smith v Ralph Heathcoate, Hugh Davies

Smith, Matthew

  • STAC 5/S65/5 - B A - 25 Eliz - Matthew Smyth v William Lacye, Philip Browne
  • STAC 5/S21/35 - I D - 24 Eliz - Matthew Smith v William Lacye

Smith, Matthew

  • STAC 5/S2/34 - B A - Trin 43 Eliz - Matthew Smith, Henry Smith v John Brewer, Francis Smith, James Hubbert, Humphrey Paget, William Heyward et al

Smith, Nicholas

  • STAC 5/S48/7 - B A Rn - 20 Eliz - Nicholas Smith v Alban Clark, Brigitt Clark
  • STAC 5/S8/39 - I D - 20 Eliz - Nicholas Smith v Albon Clarke et uxor
  • STAC 5/S28/32 - I D - 21 Eliz - Nicholas Smyth v Bridget Clarke

Smith, Nicholas

  • STAC 5/S58/32 - B A - 30 Eliz - Nicholas Smith v Lord John Darcie, George Page et al
  • STAC 5/S53/25 - I D - 30 Eliz - Nicholas Smith v George Poage

Smith, Nicholas

  • STAC 5/S21/29 - B - 33 Eliz - Nicholas Smith v John Morgan, William Morgan, Giles Mason et al
  • STAC 7/29/38 - - - Nicholas Smythe v Robert Jower et al

Smith, Peter

  • STAC 5/S63/26 - B A - 20 Eliz - Peter Smithe, Gilbert Bodleigh v David Lewes, Richard Sawyn et al

Smith, Peter

  • STAC 5/S22/33 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - Peter Smith v Richard Haxbie, Thomas Rogerson et al
  • STAC 5/S44/6 - Rr - 42 Eliz - Peter Smyth v Richard Haxby, Thomas Rogerson et al
  • STAC 5/S42/30 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Peter Smith v Richard Haxby, William Foxgill et al

Smith Philip

  • STAC 5/S21/23 - B A - 40 Eliz - Philip Smith, Robert Fisher v George Reynell, Elizabeth Reynell et al

Attorney General

  • STAC 5/A43/35 - I D - 40 Eliz - AG v Philip Smithe, Robert Fisher et al
  • STAC 5/A14/22 - I D - 40 Eliz - AG v Philip Smith, Robert Fisher et al
  • STAC 5/A10/13 - C I D - 41 Eliz - AG v Philip Smith, Robert Fysher et al
  • STAC 5/A8/39 - I D - 40 Eliz - AG v Philip Smith, Robert Fysher et al

Almoner

  • STAC 5/A58/4 - B A - 39 Eliz - Almoner v Paul Smith

Notes, Additions and Corrections:

  • STAC 5/S48/7 et al - Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 12v. Satisfaction to a plaintiff ordered to be out of a recognizance for the defendant’s appearance Smyth, plaintiff; Albane, defendant: Plaintiff prayed that he might have satisfaction of his demand out of the defendant’s recognizance entered into for his appearance in this court since he was enlarged there, upon pretence that he would agree with the plaintiff, and yet standeth out in contempt of the court being before in prison for sundry contempts at the plaintiff’s suit, whereupon the court ordered the recognizance in Chancery and satisfaction to be made accordingly out of the same. Michaelmas 24 Elizabeth (kk)
  • STAC 5/S48/7 - H Eliz 23 fo.17 - A deft to bee Close prisoner for his Contempt in the Fleete, [Nicholas] Smyth was plt, Alban was deft, for not performing the order of the Court made before against him. BL Harley 2143 f.9
  • STAC 5/S74/12 - Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 17v. Privilege. Actions sureties and bail discharged. George Smith, plaintiff; Andrew Beech, the defendant: the defendant was arrested at the suit of the plaintiff’s brother whilst he attended to be examined and the plaintiff’s solicitor entered three actions in other men’s names against the defendant, all which actions and the sureties and bail were discharged by writ of privilege. Hillary 31 Elizabeth (kk)
  • STAC 5/S40/24 – ?Yetton, Herefs (dk)
  • STAC 5/S48/35 possibly should be in STAC Stanhope