STAC Smith, F-H

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search

Smith, Francis

  • STAC 5/S19/16 - B - 12 Eliz - Francis Smith v John Somerville et al
  • STAC 5/S47/39 - B - 18 Eliz - Francis Smith, Humfrey Unton et al v James Ybbins et al
  • STAC 5/S33/19 - B A - 18 Eliz - Francis Smith v John Palmer, Edward Careless et al
  • STAC 5/S1/2 - I D - 19 Eliz - Warwickshire - Francis Smyth v David Palmer, John Danyel, John Mason, John Boke, John Hoddeley alias Hodde, John Careles, Robert Piper, John Eyles alias Yeles, Francis Hopkyns alias Pyper
  • STAC 5/S17/31 - B Dr - 27 Eliz - Francis Smith v Thomas Gyllam Sr, William Vernam et al
  • STAC 5/S76/36 - B A - 38 Eliz - Francis Smith v Thomas Skarlett, William Davies et al
  • STAC 5/S22/35 - I D - 38 Eliz - Francis Smith v Thomas Baldwin et al
  • STAC 5/S38/4 - I D - 38 Eliz - Francis Smyth v Thomas Scarlett, Antony Street et al
  • STAC 5/S44/11 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Francis Smith v Thomas Skarlett, William Forster
  • STAC 5/S33/40 - C I D - 39 Eliz - Francis Smith v Antony Street, John Glasse et al
  • STAC 5/S36/37 - I D - 40 Eliz - Francis Smyth v Thomas Baldwyn, Thomas Scarlett et al
  • STAC 5/S21/2 - B Dr - 43 Eliz - Francis Smith, Robert Smith v William Brooke et uxor, William Gardiner et al
  • STAC 5/S34/23 - D - 44 Eliz - Francis Smyth v Agnes Brooke, William Philips

Smith, George

  • STAC 5/S41/20 - B - - George Smyth v Robert Coke, Roger Raunte
  • STAC 5/S49/33 - A - - George Smyth v William Gruffith
  • STAC 5/S45/14 - B A Rn - 8 Eliz - George Smyth v John Aston, Robert Aston, Thomas Chester et al
  • STAC 5/S58/40 - B A Rn - 11 Eliz - George Smithes William Smithes v Edmund Kenne, George Kenne
  • STAC 5/S43/8 - I D - 13 Eliz - George Smith v Thomas Pygott et al
  • STAC 5/S45/35 - B A Rn - 14 Eliz - George Smyth v Thomas Pigott, John Cole et al
  • STAC 5/S6/19 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 26 Eliz - George Smythe v William Clenche et uxor, Richard Paule
  • STAC 5/S39/6 - I D - 26 Eliz - George Smyth v William Clench, Richard Paule
  • STAC 5/S8/14 - I D - 27 Eliz - George Smith v Thomas Heard, Edward Heard, George Heard, John Heard
  • STAC 5/S69/5 - B A Rn - 31 Eliz - Staffordshire - George Smith v Andrew Beech, John Verdor et al
  • STAC 5/S57/35 - B - 38 Eliz - George Smith v William Griffith, Howel ap Richard ap David

Smith, Henry

  • STAC 5/S37/29 - B A - - Hampshire - Henry Smyth v Joan Tytchborne, Francis Tytchborne
  • STAC 5/S29/5 - B A - 21 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Smith v Richard Willye, William Wace
  • STAC 5/S48/21 - I D - 24 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Smith v Richard Willy, William Ware et al
  • STAC 5/S21/22 - B A - 29 Eliz - Henry Smyth v John Bowltinge, Robert Younger et al
  • STAC 5/S62/15 - I D - 31 Eliz - Henry Smith v Roger Clark
  • STAC 5/S6/7 - B - 38 Eliz - Durham - Henry Smith v Thomas Sympson
  • STAC 5/S1/6 - I D - 40 Eliz - Suffolk - Henry Smithe v Philip Gawdy, Thomas Robinson, Roger Manning, John Knapp, [blank] Foster, Dudley Fortescue
  • STAC 5/S61/19 - I D - 41 Eliz - Henry Smith v Thomas Robinson et al
  • STAC 5/S28/19 - B A Dr - 41 Eliz - Henry Smith v Dudley Fortescue, Philip Gawdie
  • STAC 5/S39/26 - A - 41 Eliz - Henry Smyth v Thomas Robynson
  • STAC 5/S26/11 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Henry Smyth v Dudley Fortescue, Thomas Robinson et al

Smith, Hugh

  • STAC 5/S64/1 - I D - 21 Eliz - Bristol - Hugh Smith v Thomas Norton, John Parsons et al
  • STAC 5/S14/26 - - 21 Eliz - Bristol - Hugh Smith v Sir John Younge, Sir George Norton et al
  • STAC 5/S9/17 - I D - 21 Eliz - Bristol - Hugh Smith v Christopher Kenn, John Saunders
  • STAC 7/29/35 - - - Bristol - Hugh Smythe v Sir John Yonge et al
  • STAC 5/S36/39 - B - - Bristol - Henry Smyth v Sir George Norton, John Yonge Sr et al. Report STAC 5/S36/39
  • STAC 5/S75/13 - I D - 21 Eliz - Bristol - Henry Smyth v Thomas Kenn
  • STAC 5/S24/12 - I D - 21 Eliz - Bristol - Hugh Smithe v Sir John Younge
  • STAC 5/S54/6 - I D - 22 Eliz - Bristol - Hughes Smith v Sir George Norton, Sir John Younge et al
  • STAC 5/S82/10 - B A Dr - 33 Eliz - Hugh Smith v Thomas Welsh, John Sanaker et al
  • STAC 5/S79/18 - I D - 33 Eliz - Hugh Smyth v John Savaker, Thomas Welsh et al

Bevan Case Index

  • Smith v [unknown] - STAC 7/29/38 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v [unknown] - STAC 5/S11/5 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Abell - STAC 5/S38/24, STAC 5/S7/35, STAC 5/S68/16, STAC 5/S85/12 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Andrews - STAC 5/S3/7 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Ap Hugh - STAC 5/S11/4 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Appleford - STAC 5/S28/37, STAC 5/S35/10, STAC 5/S31/21, STAC 5/S46/16, STAC 5/S55/12, STAC 7/29/36 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Ashton - STAC 5/S16/8, STAC 5/S17/20, STAC 5/S38/29, STAC 5/S68/2 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Ashwell - STAC 5/S30/34, STAC 5/S9/22, STAC 5/S14/17, STAC 5/S14/31 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Aston - STAC 5/S45/14
  • Smith v Babbe - STAC 5/S81/13, STAC 5/S4/35 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Bagnall - STAC 5/S30/40 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Bagnall - STAC 5/S71/25 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Baldwin - STAC 5/S3/9, STAC 5/S42/29 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Bamfield - STAC 5/S24/27 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Beech - STAC 5/S69/5
  • Smith v Beech - STAC 5/S74/12 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Berkeley - STAC 5/S69/19 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Birche - STAC 5/S81/10 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Birche - STAC 5/S13/24, STAC 5/S47/21 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Bishop - STAC 5/S28/13, STAC 5/S70/33, STAC 5/S76/6 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Bolting - STAC 5/S21/22, STAC 5/S62/15
  • Smith v Bonner - STAC 5/S81/25 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Bowfoot - STAC 5/S68/5 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Bradshaw - STAC 5/S73/28, STAC 5/S31/3, STAC 5/S40/32, STAC 5/S32/30, STAC 5/S9/7, STAC 5/S17/1, STAC 5/S37/25 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Brewer - STAC 5/S2/34 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Brewster - STAC 5/S22/15, STAC 5/S50/33 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Bristowe - STAC 5/S64/16, STAC 5/S4/38, STAC 5/S11/24, STAC 5/S15/27, STAC 5/S66/30 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Brooke - STAC 5/S21/2, STAC 5/S34/23
  • Smith v Brookhouse - STAC 5/S33/33, STAC 5/S1/40, STAC 5/S10/20 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Browne - STAC 5/S65/15 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Busby - STAC 5/S78/38, STAC 5/S12/39 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Bussey - STAC 5/S58/5 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Byng - STAC 5/S24/8, STAC 5/S3/3 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Carnesdale - STAC 5/S82/35, STAC 5/S40/27, STAC 5/S47/37 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Charnock - STAC 5/S3/30, STAC 5/S61/36 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Christian - STAC 5/S21/11, STAC 5/S48/14 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Clarke - STAC 5/S48/7, STAC 5/S8/39, STAC 5/S28/32 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Clench - STAC 5/S6/19, STAC 5/S8/14, STAC 5/S39/6
  • Smith v Cooke - STAC 5/S41/20
  • Smith v Crompe - STAC 5/S32/13, STAC 5/S41/38 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Crossman - STAC 5/S41/34, STAC 5/S47/38 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Cuddon - STAC 5/S5/27, STAC 5/S21/40 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Danby - STAC 5/S78/40, STAC 5/S42/39 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Davis - STAC 5/S40/40 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Dawes - STAC 5/S29/24 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Delves - STAC 7/5/23 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Denton - STAC 5/S59/1 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Digleyn - STAC 5/S19/25 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Dobson - STAC 5/S59/26 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Duffield - STAC 5/S27/10, STAC 5/S1/27, STAC 5/S15/29, STAC 5/S17/21, STAC 5/S38/26, STAC 5/S46/39, STAC 5/S56/15, STAC 5/S76/18, STAC 5/S85/26 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Durban - STAC 5/S47/13 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Evans - STAC 5/S56/22 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Finney - STAC 5/S38/13, STAC 5/S66/23 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Flackett - STAC 5/S26/18 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Flint - STAC 5/S57/10 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Flint - STAC 5/S26/5, STAC 5/S34/29, STAC 5/S50/22 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Fortescue - STAC 5/S28/19, STAC 5/S1/6, STAC 5/S26/11, STAC 5/S39/26, STAC 5/S61/19
  • Smith v Foxall - STAC 5/S37/31, STAC 5/S45/10, STAC 5/S85/5 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Foxgill - STAC 5/S46/18 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Froude - STAC 5/S55/8 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Galhampton - STAC 5/S83/11, STAC 5/S25/9 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Garland - STAC 5/S63/17 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Goddard - STAC 5/S36/38, STAC 5/S47/29, STAC 5/S65/20, STAC 5/S71/36 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Goodman - STAC 5/S23/16, STAC 5/S51/30 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Green - STAC 5/S77/5 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Grey - STAC 5/S59/13 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Griffith - STAC 5/S57/35, STAC 5/S49/33, STAC 5/S45/3
  • Smith v Guilliam - STAC 5/S17/31
  • Smith v Hammond - STAC 5/S76/10, STAC 5/S11/8 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Hanmer - STAC 5/S22/28, STAC 5/S61/25 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Hansman - STAC 5/S77/26 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Harris - STAC 5/S81/5, STAC 5/S36/23, STAC 5/S39/29, STAC 5/S82/39 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Harrison - STAC 7/5/25 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Harvey - STAC 5/S81/38 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Hawkins - STAC 5/S17/32, STAC 5/S19/22 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Haxby - STAC 5/S22/33, STAC 5/S42/30, STAC 5/S44/6 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Heard - STAC 5/S29/16 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Heathcote - STAC 5/S21/34, STAC 5/S53/5 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Hitchcock - STAC 5/S7/18, STAC 5/S11/37, STAC 5/S43/1, STAC 5/S66/12 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Hobbes - STAC 5/S67/3 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Horden - STAC 5/S4/33, STAC 5/S66/18, STAC 5/S85/22 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Hubbard - STAC 5/S23/12 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Hudsford - STAC 5/S52/9, STAC 5/S74/16, STAC 5/S11/9, STAC 5/S13/25, STAC 5/S48/23, STAC 5/S77/25 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Humphreys - STAC 5/S73/4, STAC 7/5/27, STAC 5/S20/30, STAC 5/S30/4, STAC 5/S31/12, STAC 5/S46/12, STAC 5/S47/7, STAC 5/S55/10 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Huntley - STAC 5/S45/33 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Jackson - STAC 5/S47/15, STAC 5/S11/2, STAC 5/S24/37, STAC 5/S57/16, STAC 5/S68/10, STAC 5/S69/12 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v James - STAC 5/S85/1, STAC 5/S86/5 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Johnson - STAC 5/S67/14 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Johnson - STAC 5/S18/31, STAC 5/S54/12 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Jower - STAC 5/S41/1, STAC 5/S67/33, STAC 7/29/37 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Jower - STAC 5/S55/27 see STAC Selby
  • Smith v Judd - STAC 5/S30/17 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Kenne - STAC 5/S58/40
  • Smith v Kenne - STAC 5/S18/13 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Knevett - STAC 5/S60/1, STAC 5/S49/24 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Lacy - STAC 5/S65/5, STAC 5/S21/35 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Langridge - STAC 7/15/24 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Lee - STAC 5/S70/40, STAC 5/S12/15 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Lewis - STAC 5/S63/26 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Lochard - STAC 5/S40/24 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Lord Darcy - STAC 5/S58/32, STAC 5/S53/25 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Marshall - STAC 5/S31/11 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Mascall - STAC 5/S22/20 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Maudesly - STAC 5/S23/24, STAC 5/S9/16, STAC 5/S19/20, STAC 5/S33/17, STAC 5/S76/2 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Mills - STAC 5/S12/30, STAC 5/S76/3 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Milward - STAC 5/S68/7 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Morgan - STAC 5/S24/13, STAC 5/S14/13 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Morgan - STAC 5/S21/29 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Morrey - STAC 5/S40/36 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Needham - STAC 5/S74/29 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Norton - STAC 5/S68/14, STAC 5/S26/22 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Palmer - STAC 5/S33/19, STAC 5/S1/2
  • Smith v Parkes - STAC 5/S70/29 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Parsons - STAC 5/S42/9, STAC 5/S62/11, STAC 5/S11/36, STAC 5/S12/13, STAC 5/S40/15 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Pelham - STAC 5/S44/13, STAC 5/S9/13, STAC 5/S41/35 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Phillips - STAC 5/S7/15, STAC 5/S18/38, STAC 5/S52/30 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Pigott - STAC 5/S45/35, STAC 5/S43/8
  • Smith v Pye - STAC 5/S7/30 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Reeve - STAC 5/S4/26 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Reynolds - STAC 5/S21/23 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Reynolds - STAC 5/S81/3 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Rock - STAC 5/S85/29 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Russell - STAC 5/S3/13, STAC 5/S84/34 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Savery - STAC 5/S34/8 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Scarlett - STAC 5/S76/36, STAC 5/S22/35, STAC 5/S33/40, STAC 5/S36/37, STAC 5/S38/4, STAC 5/S44/11
  • Smith v Serewyche - STAC 5/S57/27, STAC 5/S8/10, STAC 7/29/34 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Serrett - STAC 5/S31/31 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Sherratt - STAC 5/S52/17 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Simpson - STAC 5/S6/7
  • Smith v Singleton - STAC 5/S35/27, STAC 5/S37/37 see STAC Smith, K-P
  • Smith v Smith - STAC 5/S27/22, STAC 5/S22/1, STAC 5/S84/31 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Smith - STAC 5/S62/1, STAC 5/S16/10, STAC 5/S64/19 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Smith - STAC 5/S41/37, see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Smith - STAC 5/S39/3, STAC 5/S5/4, STAC 5/S61/3, STAC 5/S19/10, STAC 5/S29/21, STAC 5/S41/22, STAC 5/S72/35 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Somerville - STAC 5/S19/16
  • Smith v Sorrell - STAC 5/S53/32, STAC 5/S25/22, STAC 5/S32/24, STAC 5/S47/24 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Sydenham - STAC 5/S3/31 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Talherst - STAC 5/S77/17, STAC 5/S35/13, STAC 5/S37/2, STAC 5/S52/32 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Taylor - STAC 5/S32/2 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Thomas - STAC 5/S3/34, STAC 5/S23/5, STAC 5/S52/26, STAC 5/S56/3, STAC 5/S62/5, STAC 5/S71/17 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Tichbourne - STAC 5/S37/29
  • Smith v Tunstall - STAC 5/S51/8 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Turke - STAC 5/S64/14 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Turner - STAC 5/S24/35 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Turney - STAC 5/S50/10, STAC 5/S81/20, STAC 5/S30/9, STAC 5/S35/18, STAC 5/S45/20 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Tye - STAC 5/S65/29, STAC 5/S10/3, STAC 5/S60/21 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Welsh - STAC 5/S82/10, STAC 5/S79/18
  • Smith v Wethered - STAC 5/S48/39 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Whyndrey - STAC 5/S66/6, STAC 5/S2/12, STAC 5/S13/31 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Willy - STAC 5/S29/5, STAC 5/S48/21
  • Smith v Wilson - STAC 5/S53/1, STAC 5/S9/20 see STAC Smith, R
  • Smith v Windsor - STAC 5/S25/17, STAC 7/15/3, STAC 5/S14/36 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Wolfall - STAC 7/5/24, STAC 5/S9/8, STAC 5/S18/6, STAC 5/S18/27, STAC 5/S31/28, STAC 5/S41/7, STAC 5/S49/4, STAC 5/S49/19, STAC 5/S57/30, STAC 5/S65/37, STAC 5/S75/26, STAC 5/S79/13, STAC 5/S82/20 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Wolman - STAC 5/S74/36, STAC 5/S12/25, STAC 5/S29/31, STAC 5/S34/3 see STAC Smith, S-Z
  • Smith v Wood - STAC 5/S31/14, STAC 5/S83/37 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Woodhouse - STAC 5/S43/20, STAC 5/S1/15, STAC 5/S14/3, STAC 5/S30/7, STAC 5/S37/21, STAC 5/S54/21, STAC 5/S57/22 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Woodliffe - STAC 5/S42/15, STAC 5/S46/5 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Wotton - STAC 5/S66/26 see STAC Smith, A-E
  • Smith v Wrestley - STAC 5/S36/28 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Wylde - STAC 5/S50/16, STAC 5/S82/17 see STAC Smith, J
  • Smith v Ybbins - STAC 5/S47/39
  • Smith v Young - STAC 5/S36/39, STAC 5/S75/13, STAC 5/S14/26, STAC 5/S9/17, STAC 5/S24/12, STAC 5/S54/6, STAC 5/S64/1, STAC 7/29/35

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 5/S1/6 - Dep: exam’o capt 29 die Novembr Anno R Rne Eliz 41mi Sup Interr ex’te Henrici Smith quet ministrat. Phillip Gawdie of Chelton in the Countie of Suff Esquier and Dudley Fortescue of Chilton co Suff Esq. Int: In primis did not you Roger Mannynge having in your hand a pitchforke together with John Knap having a pitchforke and Henry Kendall having a pitchforke by the appoyntment of Phillip Gawdy Esquire on Monday xiiijth August last past come into a field of Thomas Robinson of Sudbrey . . . in the parish of Chiltern . . . with pupose to gather in the tithe
  • STAC 5/S1/2 - Interrogatories to be ministered to Edwarde Palmer John Danyell clerke John Mason and John Boke. Inprimis where were you the tenth and eleveth dayes of Julye last past and whether were you not in either or anye of the said tenth or eleventh dayes at a lane in Wawens Wotton (Wooton Wawen) in co Warwick called Church Hill Lane, yea or no.
  • STAC 5/S54/6; S24/12; S75/13; S14/26: Bristol, see Feuding Gentry and an Affray on College Green, Bristol, in 1579 (note that although this references S75/13 & S14/26, there is no mention of a Henry Smith).
  • STAC 5/S69/5 - George Smith of Audeley, Staffs & Margaret his wife. Copyhold messuage, 4 cottages & 42 acres in Audeley.(dk)
  • STAC 5/S29/5 - Henry Smyth of Salfletby, Lincs v George Wyllie of Salfletby, Richard Willye & William Ware. Perjury in action claiming slanderous words in Common Pleas against the complt.(dk)*
  • STAC 5/S6/7 - Henrie Smithe of the City of Durham. Lease from the Bishop of Durham and sinking of coal mines in Grewborne adjoining the river Gawneles to the south, and Softlie to the north, in Co Durham. (dk)
  • STAC 5/S37/29 - Henry Smythe of Upton, Hants. Parsonage of Olde Alfforde, Hants.(dk)
  • STAC 5/S69/5 - Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 17v. Privilege. Actions sureties and bail discharged. George Smith, plaintiff; Andrew Beech, the defendant: the defendant was arrested at the suit of the plaintiff’s brother whilst he attended to be examined and the plaintiff’s solicitor entered three actions in other men’s names against the defendant, all which actions and the sureties and bail were discharged by writ of privilege. Hillary 31 Elizabeth (kk)
  • STAC 5/S14/26 et al - Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 20v. £100 cost £100 damages to be paid by the plaintiff for wrongful vexation. Hugh Smith, plaintiff; Sir John Young: for maintenance, oppression, falsifying of depositions, perjury, riot and other misdemeanors whereof no proof being made, the court adjudged the plaintiff to pay the defendant being a knight and a justice of peace £100 damages, £100 costs and £100 fine to the King and to make submission at the assizes. Michaelmas 23 Elizabeth (kk)
  • STAC 5/S75/13 - Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 38v. A justice of peace for bailing a prisoner alone committed to the gaol for felony for granting supersedas to discharge a warrant of the peace. An undersheriff and his bailiff for extortion and undervaluing, &c. Costs to a defendant acquitted upon a several charge. Hugh Smith, plaintiff; Kenn: charged with supposed perjury, maintenance of pirates, buying of their goods, straying and taxing of certain persons beyond order for the service of the Queen, for dismissing of a felon, confessing himself guilty for extortion being High Sheriff of the county of Somerset of which offences the plaintiff made no proofs and therefore the defendant was discharged thereof but being likewise charged with a misdemeanor in bailing a prisoner of himself alone being committed to the gaol for felony and taking bond of the prisoner for the peace only with two sufficient sureties for granting a supersedeas to a man, in discharge of a warrant of the peace, and binding the offender colourably to the same offender’s friend whereby he might procure his discharge at his pleasure, for this offence he was fined 40 marks, Fleet. And Thomas Kenn for extortion done by colour of his office being under sheriff and Thomas Parsons one of his bailiffs did corruptly extort diverse sums of money, corn and grain of diverse men to forbear to empanel and return them upon attaint and in their places did directly return disable men upon the same panel for attaint and the said Thomas Kenn was likewise charged that having distrained cattle by a writ of withernam sold the same cattle unto his friends at an undervalue and yet detained the money in his own hands from the party grieved; for which several offences they were also adjudged to pay for a fine vizt Thomas Kenn, £40 and Parsons £10 and to make double restitution in open assizes to the parties of whom they had received such moneys, Fleet; and for that the plaintiff make no proofs against 4 other defendants charged with perjury only wherewith the other defendants counted were not charged wherefore the court dismissed with such costs as the Lord Chief Justice should assess in their behalfs. Michaelmas 23 Elizabeth (kk)
  • STAC 5/S14/26 et al - Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 38r. Misdemeanor in a justice of peace punished for the like case by a plaintiff no party grieved. Smith, plaintiff; Sir George North and Christopher Kenn, defendants: justices of peace charged with concealment of felony, falsifying of depositions, subornation of perjury and alteration of verdict for granting of blank warrant which was adjudged no offence in them for not certifying recognizance by them taken for appearances at the sessions and for wrongful imprisoning of two poor women his neighbours in his own case of which two last offences they were only convicted and fined at £20 a piece and Sir George for imprisoning the two poor women £10 fine and Fleet and acquitted of the other offences for that some were pardoned and other some not proved and the party in this case no party grieved. Michaelmas 23 Elizabeth (kk)
  • Biography in “The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1558-1603,” ed. P.W. Hasler, 1981.
    • SMITH, Humphrey (c.1542-89), of London and Cullompton, Devon.