STAC Saunders

From Waalt

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Saunders, Alice

  • STAC 5/S4/29 - B A Rn - 11 Eliz - Dame Alice Saunders v Edmund Saunders
  • STAC 5/S78/23 - I D - 12 Eliz - Lady Alice Saunders v Edmond Saunder, George Heaver et al
  • STAC 5/S8/25 - I D - 12 Eliz - Dame Alice Saunders v Edmund Saunders, George Heaver, William Byllyngton et al
  • STAC 5/S10/36 - I D - 12 Eliz - Dame Alice Saunders v Edmund Saunder

Saunders, Edward

  • STAC 5/S52/12 - B A - 35 Eliz - Edward Saunders v Francis Westley
  • STAC 5/S5/21 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Edward Saunders v Francis Westley
  • STAC 5/S30/11 - I D - 35 Eliz - Edward Sauners v Francis Westley

Saunder, John

  • STAC 5/S28/38 - B - 19 Eliz - John Sander, Walter Rood et al v Richard Berry alias Bury
  • STAC 5/S40/19 - C I D - 20 Eliz - John Sanders et al v Richard Burge
  • STAC 5/S55/2 - I D - 20 Eliz - John Sander, Walter Roode et al v Richard Berrye
  • STAC 5/S6/13 - B A - 21 Eliz - John Saunder v Richard Berry

Saunder, John

  • STAC 5/S85/40 - B - 21 Eliz - John Saunders v George Ellison

Saunder, John

  • STAC 5/S54/28 - B A - 33 Eliz - John Saunders v Martyn Trott, Samuel Newce
  • STAC 5/S70/18 - I D - 33 Eliz - John Saunders v Martyn Trott
  • STAC 5/S81/7 - I D - 33 Eliz - Anne Soame, Jane Lehmite, John Sanders et al v Martyn Trotte

Saunders, Michael

  • STAC 5/S7/24 - B - 38 Eliz - Michael Saunders v Edward Barnhouse, William Smith

Saunders, Millicent

  • STAC 5/S80/1 - B - 44 Eliz - Millecent Saunders, Thomas Wright v Marmaduke Dawney, William Gardyner et al

Sander, Nicholas

  • STAC 5/S53/20 - B A Rn - 30 Eliz - Nicholas Sander v Nicholas Fenner, Beattrice Fenner, Alice Fenner
  • STAC 5/S76/15 - I D - 30 Eliz - Nicholas Saunder v Alice Venner, Nicholas Venner, Bettrice Venner

Saunders Richard

  • STAC 5/S37/8 - B A Rn Rr - 32 Eliz - Richard Saunders v William Duncombe, John Shewbrooke
  • STAC 5/S55/9 - I D - 32 Eliz - Thomas Saunders, Richard Saunders v William Duncombe, John Sebrook

Saunders Richard

  • STAC 5/S73/26 - B A - 33 Eliz - Richard Sanders v John Browne Sr, John Browne, William Leigh et al
  • STAC 5/S66/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Saunders v John Brown, Peter Lea et al
  • STAC 5/S58/4 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Sanders v John Browne
  • STAC 5/S39/19 - I D - 34 Eliz - Richard Sawnders v John Browne, Peter Lee et al

Saunders Richard

  • STAC 5/S76/12 - B - 41 Eliz - Richard Saunders v William Stone, Thomas Fuller et al
  • STAC 5/S34/34 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Sanders v Ellen Stone, Christian Kettle
  • STAC 5/S36/21 - B A - 42 Eliz - Richard Saunders v William Stone, Thomas Fuller et al
  • STAC 5/S49/22 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Richard Saunders v William Stone, William Kilpin et al
  • STAC 5/S12/5 - I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Sanders v William Stone, Emanuel Stone
  • STAC 5/S60/37 - A - 42 Eliz - Richard Saunders v William Kylpin, Thomas Fuller et al
  • STAC 5/S25/6 - I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Sanders v William Kylpin, Thomas Fuller et al

Saunders, Thomas

  • STAC 5/S28/22 - B - - Thomas Sanders v Henry Reve, Thomas Illinge et al

Saunders, Thomas

  • STAC 5/S16/13 - B A - 29 Eliz - Thomas Saunders v Lawrence Meredale, Humfrey Holte

Sanders, Tomazin

  • STAC 5/S41/25 - B - 17 Eliz - Thomazin Sanders v Thomas Redhed

Saunders, Walsingham

  • STAC 5/S81/26 - B - 25 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Sanders v John Henshawe, Christopher Haynes et al. Report STAC 5/S81/26r
  • STAC 5/S57/6 - I D - 25 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Sanders v John Moake, John Henshaw et al
  • STAC 5/S35/6 - I D - 25 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Sanders v William Pullock
  • STAC 5/S79/27 - A Rn Rr I D - 26 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Saunders v John Hanshaw, Christopher Heynes et al
  • STAC 5/S65/14 - C I D - 26 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Saunders v Christopher Haynes, John Henshaw et al
  • STAC 5/S16/6 - I - 12 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Saunders v Christopher Haynes, John Henshawe et al
  • STAC 5/S73/11 - I D - 26 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Sanders v John Hemshawe, Christopher Hames et al
  • STAC 5/S66/29 - I D - 26 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Saunders v John Henshawe, William Puttock et al

Saunder, William

  • STAC 5/S1/31 - B - Hil 9 Eliz - William Saunder v Thomas Gregory
  • STAC 5/S1/32 - B - Hil 9 Eliz - William Saunder v Antony Gattonbye

Saunder, William

  • STAC 5/S9/35 - I D - 19 Eliz - William Saunders v Walter Morgan Wolfe
  • STAC 5/S32/15 - I D - 19 Eliz - William Saunders v Reynold Williams

Saunder, William

  • STAC 5/S67/11 - B - - William Saunders v William Fyfe, Joan Fyfe, James Saunders
  • STAC 5/S83/18 - A - 29 Eliz - William Saunders v William Fyse et al
  • STAC 5/S25/25 - I D - 29 Eliz - William Sanders v William Fyne

Saunder, William

  • STAC 5/S48/40 - Rn - 41 Eliz - William Saunder v William Shute, Roger Howe

Attorney General

  • STAC 5/A23/34 -B A - 43 Eliz - Northamptonshire - AG v William Saunders, Robert Bishop et al
  • STAC 5/A35/16 - I D - 44 Eliz - Northamptonshire - AG v William Saunders, Robert Bishop, Richard Hartpole et al
  • STAC 7/10/14 - - - Northamptonshire - AG (Edward Coke) v William Saunders et al

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 46r. Perjury laid generally and concluded which the statute of 5 Elizabeth in the prayer of process amended by order of court. Sanders, plaintiff; Nore et al: for perjury who prayed to amendment of his bill for that the bill was laid and grounded to be committed contrary to Her Majesty’s laws and statutes, and yet in the praying of process in the same bill, praieth also that the same persons might stand to and abide such order and direction as by the laws and statutes of the 5th year of Her Majesty is provided, whereupon the plaintiff prayed that the word so continued in the conclusion of the prayer of process might be stricken out which was accordingly ordered. Michaelmas 34 Elizabeth (kk)
  • STAC 5/S40/19 – ?Halberton, Devon (dk)
  • STAC 5/S6/13 – Halberton, Devon - (John Saunder v Richard Berry)