STAC Pigott

From Waalt

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Pigott, Francis

  • STAC 5/P56/25 - I D - 37 Eliz - - Francis Pigott v Nicholas Fletcher alias Coke, Walter Rauley et al

Pygot, George

  • STAC 5/P23/36 - B - 25 Eliz - - George Pygot v Richard Shepard, John Betenson

Pygott, Gyles

  • STAC 5/P62/4 - B - - - Gyles Pygott v Thomas Tyrrel, Ralph Dutton et al
  • STAC 5/P9/24 - I D - 30 Eliz - - Gyles Pygot v William Jennings, Thomas Barker alias Tyrrell

Pigott, Richard

  • STAC 5/P16/37 - D - 19 Eliz - - Richard Pigott v Joan Stevenson

Pygott, Robert

  • STAC 5/P47/29 - B - - - Robert Pygott, Matthew Pygott v Thomas Cowper, Robert Hill et al

Pigott, Susan

  • STAC 5/P5/27 - B A - Hil 21 Eliz - - Susan Pigott v Richard Groffield, John Walton, Thomas Southern et al
  • STAC 5/P11/12 - I D - 20 Eliz - - Susan Pygott v John Walton, Thomas Gotherne et al
  • STAC 7/27/36 - - 20 Eliz - - Susan Pigott v John Walton et al

Pigott, Thomas

  • STAC 5/P65/8 - B - - - Thomas Pygott v Nicholas Aldridge, William Holt et al

Pigott, Thomas

  • STAC 5/P32/12 - B A Rn Rr - - - Thomas Pigott v Ralph Palmer, Thomas Bradley et al
  • STAC 5/P36/6 - I D - 4 Eliz - - Thomas Pigott v Ralph Palmer et al

Pigott, Thomas

  • STAC 5/P3/4 - B A Rn Rr C - 7 Eliz - - Thomas Pigott v John Davys, William Holte et uxor, John Gregory, John Blabye, John Bearyt, Thomas Bowdry et al
  • STAC 5/P9/30 - I D - 7 Eliz - - Thomas Pygotte v William Holte et uxor, John Berge, John Gregory et al
  • STAC 5/P9/38 - I D - 7 Eliz - - Thomas Pygotte v Edward Marshe, Jerome Ivance, John Ivance, Thomas Bodycotte et al
  • STAC 5/P10/13 - I D - 6 Eliz - - Thomas Pygott v Edmund Marshe, Thomas Bodycott et al

Pigott, Thomas

  • STAC 5/P16/36 - B A Rn - 10 Eliz - - Thomas Pigott v Jerome Ivance, Thomas Bodycott et al

Pigott, Thomas

  • STAC 5/P59/6 - B A Rn Rr - 21 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Pigott, Sr, Thomas Pigott Jr v Sir Robert Lane, Thomas Hampton et al
  • STAC 5/P62/11 - B I D - 21 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Pygot Sr, Thomas Pygot Jr v Thomas Hampton et al
  • STAC 5/P54/14 - I D - 21 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Pigott Sr, Thomas Pigott Jr v Sir Robert Lane et al
  • STAC 5/P49/2 - I D - 21 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Pigott Sr, Thomas Pigott Jr v Sir Robert Lane, Ralf Lane
  • STAC 5/P5/22 - B Dr - Hil 24 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Pigott Jr v Sir Robert Lane, William Lane Sr, Wm Lane Jr, Ralph Lane
  • STAC 5/P12/17 - I D - 21 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Pigot Sr, Thomas Pigot Jr v Sir Robert Lane, Ralph Lane, William Lane et al
  • STAC 5/P30/36 - I D - 22 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Pigot Sr, Thomas Pigot Jr v Sir Robert Lane et al

Pigott, Thomas

  • STAC 5/P4/20 - B A Rn - Mich 22/23 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Pigott Sr, Thomas Pigott Jr v Paul Edward alias Heyword
  • STAC 5/P18/13 - I D - 24 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Pygott Sr, Thomas Pygott Jr v Paul Edward
  • STAC 5/P15/8 - I D - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Pigott v Paul Eward alias Herward

Pigott, Thomas

  • STAC 5/P61/40 - B A C - 21 Eliz - - Thomas Pygott v John French, Roger Downton et al
  • STAC 5/P40/11 - I D - 31 Eliz - - Thomas Piggott v John French
  • STAC 5/P57/37 - A - 31 Eliz - - Thomas Pigott v John French et al
  • STAC 5/P10/30 - I D - 39 Eliz - - Thomas Pigott v John French
    • probably also STAC French STAC 5/F24/29 John French v Thomas Pigott

Pigott, Thomas

  • STAC 5/P3/21 - B - 33 Eliz - Shropshire - Thomas Pigott v William Baldwyn
  • STAC 5/P58/13 - Dr - 34 Eliz - Shropshire - Thomas Pigott v William Baldwyn
  • STAC 5/P3/32 - Dr - 34 Eliz - Shropshire - Thomas Pigott v William Baldwin

Pygott, Wiliam

  • STAC 5/P43/28 - B - 17 Eliz - Denbigh - William Pygott v Robert Salisbury, John Griffith et al

Attorney General

  • STAC 5/A43/36 - I D - 31 Eliz - - AG v John Pygott et al
  • STAC 5/A11/24 - A - 31 Eliz - - AG v John Pygott

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 5/P5/22 et al - Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 12r. Perjury arising out of a suit depending, not to be heard until the other case be first heard. Pigott, armiger, plaintiff; Hayward, defendant: perjury; the defendant’s counsel at the hearing of this cause informed the court that the perjury was committed in a cause for supposed fraud betwixt the plaintiff and Sir Robert Lane, knight, and others, yet depending in this court and ready for hearing, and therefore prayed that this cause might not proceed to hearing before the original cause, the which the court ordered accordingly that the principal cause should be first heard. Hillary 26 Elizabeth (kk)