Article 7: Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost Appeal

Article 7:
Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost Appeal

7.01 Appeal of the Panel's Decision.
Within five class days of the panel's decision, either party may file an appeal for review with the Provost or that officer designated by the Provost. The appeal shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issues to be reviewed.
 

7.02 Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost Procedural Review.
The Provost shall review the appeal within 10 class days of the receipt of the appeal. If either party has requested an appearance or is requested to appear by the Provost, then both parties must be informed. Since the case was heard by a peer group (Article 6.05), the intent of the Provost's review is not to modify the penalty nor to substitute the judgment of the Provost for that of the peer panel which heard the case, or hear new or additional facts on the case. The intent of this review is to ensure that the college hearing and judgment were not arbitrary, were not capricious or discriminatory, did not violate the due process of the accused, and did not violate the concepts of fair play to both parties. The Provost shall notify all parties of the decision within three class days of the completion of the review.
 

7.03 Actions Which the Senior Vice President for Academic
Affairs and Provost May Take.

  1. The Provost may conclude that one or more of the basic concepts involved in a fair hearing at the college level were violated and return the case to the college for another hearing with a different panel in accordance with Article 6 and resubmission for Provost procedural review; or
     
  2. If, in a rare case, the Provost feels that another hearing in the same college would not result in a fair hearing, the Provost may send the case to another college with the disciplinary expertise to hold a fair hearing, for a new hearing there in accordance with Article 6 and resubmission for Provost procedural review; or
     
  3. If, in a rare case, the Provost independently feels that the penalty assessed in the college hearing is not commensurate with the offense, then he/she may send the case back to the college as described above; or
     
  4. The Provost may approve the actions and conclusions of the college academic honesty panel and see that the judgment is enforced. The Provost procedural review is the final institutional step in matters of academic integrity.
     

 


- previous article - honesty policy home - next article -


- return to top -