| University
of Houston Faculty
Senate
Last
updated: July 7, 2006 |
University of Houston
Board of Regents Retreat
University of Houston
Faculty Senate
November 1, 2005
Allen R. Warner, President
Chair
Hermes, Vice Chair Cemo, distinguished Regents, thank you for this
opportunity
to share a faculty perspective on the need for additional resources to
accomplish the Board’s Strategic Plan.
President-elect Craig and I see a real sense of excitement and
anticipation among the faculty for moving the University of Houston to
flagship
research campus status. As one small
indication, a recent motion from Dr. Craig’s Task Force on Research
Excellence
calling for an annual campus-wide report on research and scholarly
productivity
was adopted by the Senate without dissent.
We applaud
SP 1.1, Increase the number of faculty on
campus to enhance academic and research excellence and accommodate
enrollment
growth. Tenured and tenure track
faculty are the most important resources of a university.
Faculty conduct research, prepare graduate
and professional students to conduct and use research, educate
undergraduates,
and constitute an important reserve of specialized knowledge that is
regularly
sought by the business community and by policymakers.
Both of the current
flagship universities in Texas are engaged in significant campaigns to
enhance
their research status through faculty growth.
The Texas Council of Faculty Senates, representing all public
institutions in the state, met less than two weeks ago in Austin. Following are quotes from written reports of
the two institutions we believe you wish us to emulate:
“The
University (of Texas at Austin) implemented a 10-year faculty
expansion plan in 2000-2001 designed to add 300 new faculty positions. Approximately 151 positions have been filled
to date, nearly all on the tenure track.”
UT-Austin
representatives report a target enrollment of 48,000 students for that
campus,
fewer than the 50,377 enrolled in Fall 2004.
“We
(
Fall
enrollments at Texas A&M (
Data on
reputational studies of doctoral programs from the National Research
Council
(NRC) indicate a strong relationship between faculty size and the
prestige
value of degrees. While there is variation
by program, those doctoral programs ranked in the top quartile
generally have
faculty sizes 30 percent greater than those in the second quartile; the
second
quartile, 20 percent greater than the third; and the third, still
substantially
larger than those ranked in the fourth quartile.
This direct
relationship between faculty size and research ranking is already the
topic of
action by Texas’s existing research flagship universities.
We urge the Board to develop financing plans
that will continue to support our faculty to enhance the research
ranking of
the University of Houston.
On behalf
of the University of Houston Faculty Senate, thank you again for your
dedication and commitment, and for this opportunity to share these
thoughts
with you on the challenges we face together.
| Questions about this
page should be directed to FSenate@uh.edu (713) 743-9181 University of Houston Office of the Faculty Senate 351 Cullen Performance Hall Houston, TX 77204-2005 UH Faculty Senate Home Page Mapping purposes: Houston, TX 77004 UH Home Page |