Are GM and conventionally bred cereals really different? •
REVIEW ARTICLE
Trends in Food Science & Technology, 14 January 2007,
Peter R. Shewry, Marcela Baudo,
Alison Lovegrove, Stephen Powers, Johnathan
A. Napier, Jane L. Ward, John M. Baker and Michael H. Beale
Abstract: Concerns over the safety of GM crops have led to detailed
comparisons of their composition and performance with those of conventionally
bred crops, under both field and glasshouse conditions. Such studies of wheat
have shown that it is possible to develop GM lines which are substantially
equivalent to conventional varieties. This information is important to inform
the debate on the future development of GM food crops.
The two most important lines I feel are: "Comparison of the pairs of
transgenic and ‘‘parental’’ lines (B102-1-1 v L88-31, B13554 v Cadenza, B1118 v
Cadenza) showed only a small number of differentially expressed genes, with
none differing by more than 2-fold. In contrast, comparison of the two
non-transgenic sister lines (L88-31 and L88-18), which were produced from a
single cross between the cultivars Olympic and Gabo, showed that a larger
number of genes were differentially expressed in developing endosperms, 92 at
14 days (13 by greater than 3-fold) and 527 at 28 days (85 by greater than
2-fold). "
And "A striking result from our studies was the small numbers of
differentially expressed genes between the transgenic and control lines when
compared with sister lines (L88-31, L88-18) produced by a conventional crossing
programme. This is consistent with the hypothesis
that transgenesis is a highly precise and controlled
method of crop improvement compared to conventional breeding in which many
thousands of genes may differ between the lines."
Thomas R. DeGregori, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics
University of Houston
Department of Economics
204 McElhinney Hall
Houston, Texas 77204-5019
Ph. 001 - 1 - 713 743-3838
Fax 001 - 1 - 713 743-3798
Email trdegreg@uh.edu
Web homepage http://www.uh.edu/~trdegreg